Hampshire County Council Executive Member - Environment 12 February 2002 Provision of Waiting Shelter at Emsworth Station Report of the County Surveyor |
Item 10(X) |
Contact: Mike Franklin, ext 5492
1. Summary
1.1 The following decision is sought:
That the Project Appraisal for a waiting shelter at Emsworth Station be approved.
2. Reason
2.1 To enable works to proceed.
3. Other Options Considered and Rejected
3.1 Provision of a standard shelter was considered and rejected because of the high incidence of vandalism.
4. Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Decision Maker or a Member or Officer Consulted - Not applicable.
5. Dispensation granted by the Standards Committee - Not applicable.
6. Reason(s) for the Matter being dealt with if Urgent - To enable the shelter to be installed by the end of the financial year.
Approved by: Date:
Councillor K B Estlin
|
|
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE MEMBER - ENVIRONMENT |
PROJECT APPRAISAL |
_____________________________________________
12 FEBRUARY 2002
_____________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
PROJECT: |
EMSWORTH STATION - WAITING SHELTER |
____________________________________________________________________
COMMENCEMENT DATE: |
FEBRUARY 2002 |
COMPLETION DATE: |
MARCH 2002 |
PLANNED YEAR OF START IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL PROGRAMME: 2001/02 |
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
1. |
FINANCE (Client Department, Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services [Estates Practice] and County Treasurer) |
____________________________________________________________________
|
|
Current |
|
Capital | |
|
|
Estimate |
|
Programme | |
|
|
(at Feb 02 |
|
(at Feb 02 | |
|
|
prices) |
|
prices) | |
Capital Expenditure |
£'000 |
|
£'000 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
Land to be purchased |
- |
|
- | ||
Construction |
15 |
|
15 | ||
Fees |
- |
|
- | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
15 |
|
15 | |
Less developers/ |
|
|
| ||
other contributions |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
15 |
|
15 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Financial provision for total scheme |
|
|
Total Cost | ||
|
|
|
| ||
1. |
From Committees own resources |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(a) Capital programme (as above) |
|
|
15 | |
|
(b) Other |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
15 | |
2. |
From other resources |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(a) |
|
|
| |
|
(b) |
|
|
| |
|
(c) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
15 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Value of land for this project in HCC ownership £ |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
Variations from capital programme |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
Revenue implications |
£'000 |
|
% variation | ||
|
|
|
|
to Committee's | |
|
|
|
|
budget | |
Net current expenditure |
- |
|
- | ||
Capital charges |
1.5 |
|
0.002 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
TOTAL net expenditure |
1.5 |
|
0.002 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
2. |
STATEMENT OF NEED/JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECT (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
|
There has been substantial vandalism over recent years at Emsworth rail station. The station operator has been able to repair most of this or lock buildings to prevent further damage. However, the waiting shelter on the eastbound (north) side platform was gradually reduced to a frame and has now been removed, as it provided no benefit to passengers. The new station operator is planning substantial refurbishment and has already improved the closed circuit television (CCTV) system, but is not in a position to commit to major investment until the new Franchise Agreement with the Strategic Rail Authority has been signed - this could take until the end of this year. In any event, Emsworth is not likely to be high on the list of priorities from the 158 stations operated by South Central. In the meantime, there is no shelter for passengers on the north side platform. A new design of 'vandal-resistant' shelter has been piloted on the Valley Lines in Wales, where vandalism has been a major problem. It has stood up well to vandalism and is simple to repair, with toughened glass panels which can be replaced relatively quickly. It has been adopted by Wales & West Trains at a number of stations. Usefully, it retains a large proportion of glass panels, therefore does not provide a safe haven for criminals from the attention of CCTV cameras. It is proposed to fund this shelter at Emsworth: (i) to provide immediate improvement for passengers at Emsworth and help encourage rail travel; (ii) to test, as a pilot, the benefits of this shelter and demonstrate it to other train operators in Hampshire; and (iii) to maintain Hampshire's profile with the new train operator, as a worthwhile local authority partner. Total cost, including some spare panels, is approximately £15,000. |
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
3. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
|
National/County network and policies The County Council's `Rail Infrastructure Blueprint' sets out the minimum objective of providing covered waiting areas/shelters at rail stations. Details of scheme and design standards Provision of a three-bay `vandal-resistant' waiting shelter, including front centre panel, seat and lighting (power to be provided with the station lights). Concrete base pads for shelter uprights will be provided by the station operator. Environmental impact None. Land requirements None. Statutory procedures None. Public consultation Consultation with parish councils and user groups was carried out as part of the formulation of the Rail Infrastructure Blueprint. Facilities for the disabled The shelter will be accessible to mobility impaired people, including those in wheelchairs, at such time as the platform itself becomes accessible. Maintenance implications The Station Operator will take responsibility for maintenance and future repairs. Crime and Disorder Act 1998 The construction of the shelter will reduce damage, is resistant to graffiti and has high visibility to provide for personal security. Sustainability The improved shelter and personal security should contribute to making travelling by public transport more comfortable. The design is durable and resistant to corrosion. It should therefore last substantially longer than normal shelters. |
___________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
4. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
|
Provision of a standard shelter was considered and rejected because of the high incidence of vandalism. |
____________________________________________________________________
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers | |
| |
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. | |
| |
NB the list excludes: | |
| |
1. |
Published works. |
| |
2. |
Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act. |
TITLE |
LOCATION |
None |
|
7030/MF
