HFRA HR Committee Job Evaluation Report Appendix 1
FM/1/6/3/1
EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT - INITIAL SCREENING
Function/Department |
Human Resources |
Person responsible for the assessment |
Bob Wythe |
Name of the policy to be addressed |
Grey Book Job Evaluation Scheme |
Date of assessment |
17 August 2005 |
Is this a new or existing policy |
New |
Note: For policy read policy/service/activity
1 Briefly describe the aims, objectives and purpose of the policy. |
To examine the function and scope of each rank up to and including Senior Divisional Officer and assimilate these to roles in accordance with Integrate Personal Development System role maps. |
2 Are there any associated objectives of the policy, please explain. |
To provide Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service with a policy for evaluating future grey book posts. |
3 Who is intended to benefit from the policy and in what way? |
Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service and its employees have a clear, consistent and open process that places its people within a role and associated pay scale. |
4 What outcomes are wanted from this policy? |
As in 3. |
5 What factors/forces could contribute/detract from the outcomes? |
All employees need to have access to procedure and policy documentation. |
FM/1/6/3/1
Page 2
(AK 6/05)
6 Who are the main stakeholders in relation to the policy? |
Corporate management and employees. |
7 Who implements the policy and who is responsible for the policy? |
Job Evaluation project team on behalf of corporate management. |
8 Are there concerns that the policy could have a differential impact: - On racial groups? - Due to gender? - Due to disability? - Due to sexual orientation? - Due to their age? - Due to their religious belief? - Due to them having dependants/caring responsibilities? - Due to them being transgendered or transsexual? |
Yes / No - What existing evidence (either presumed or otherwise) do you have for this? No No Yes - May not be able to interpret written documents or communicate a written response. No No No No No |
9 Could the differential impact identified in 8 amount to there being the potential for adverse impact in this policy? |
Yes / No / NA - Please explain No - Alternative method of explaining documentation and obtaining a written response is available. |
FM/1/6/3/1
Page 3
(AK 6/05)
10 Can this adverse impact be justified on the grounds of promoting equality of opportunity for one group? Or any other reason. |
Yes / No - Please explain for each equality strand, if necessary use a separate piece of paper No |
11 Should the policy proceed to a partial impact assessment? |
Yes / No No |
12 If yes, is there enough evidence of proceed to a full EIA? |
Yes / No |
13 Date on which partial or full impact assessment to be completed by |
Completing Officer |
Name: R Wythe |
Date: 17 August 2005 |
Review Date: |
Lead Officer |
Name: R Wythe |
Date: 17 August 2005 |
17 August 2005 |
