|
|
|
|
1 |
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
The Local Government Act 1999 places a statutory duty on local authorities to demonstrate Best Value. In order to do this, the Fire Authority must show that its services meet the needs and priorities of the population, in the most efficient, effective and economic manner. |
|
|
|
Current changes within fire safety legislation, the desire of the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions to drive cultural change toward a Community Safety agenda, and guidance from Her Majesty's Fire Service Inspectorate, have raised the need to conduct a Best Value review of the Fire Safety function. |
|
|
2 |
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE REVIEW |
|
|
|
It is the aim of this review to examine the operation of the Fire Safety function and demonstrate Hampshire Fire and Rescue Services desire to secure continuous improvement. |
|
|
3 |
METHODOLOGY |
|
|
|
The review will focus on the processes and procedures behind the key areas of the function, such as legislative enforcement, fire investigation and unwanted fire calls. Community Safety is programmed to receive a detailed review in 2003/04 (as per Programme of Major Reviews), but as a part of this project, it will be subject to a preliminary review as part of the Fire Safety Function. |
|
|
|
Reviewing current practices, processes, systems, resources and structural arrangements used within the Fire Safety function, the review will: |
|
|
|
3.1 |
Challenge |
|
|
|
|
|
Challenge why and how the services are being provided; |
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
Compare |
|
|
|
|
|
Invite comparison with other brigades, local authorities and the private sector across a range of indicators and best value practices; |
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
Consult with a cross section of employees, service-users, local authorities, fire authorities and the private sector with a view to setting new performance targets; |
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
Compete |
|
|
|
|
|
Where fair competition can be sought, the review will comment if this can be embraced as a means of securing efficient and effective services. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TERMS OF REFERENCE |
|
|
|
For the purposes of the review we shall need to consider: |
|
|
|
· Management of Fire Safety · Community Fire Safety · Fire Safety Policies and Procedures · Fire Investigation · Reduction in Unwanted Fire Alarm Calls |
|
|
|
following this pattern, it is suggested that the terms of reference should include: |
|
|
|
4.1 |
Management of Fire Safety |
|
|
|
|
i |
Review Current Fire Safety objectives in line with the Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service Corporate Plan |
|
ii |
Review the functional split between Community and Technical Safety |
|
iii |
Review the number and location of Inspecting Officers |
|
iv |
Review performance monitoring and quality control |
|
v |
Review the level, location and requirement of administrative and CAD support, including I.T. systems and programmes. |
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
Community Fire Safety |
|
|
|
|
i |
Review the recommendations held within the Thematic Review on Community Safety, and the impact this has had upon Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service |
|
ii |
Assess what further work and resources are needed in order to address the recommendations held within the Thematic Review |
|
iii |
Review the interrelationship between Community Safety and Operations in the achievement of Community Safety targets and objectives |
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
Fire Safety Policies and Procedures |
|
|
|
|
i |
Review the current workloads undertaken for legislative fire safety {inc The Fire Precautions Act 1971; The Fire Precaution (Workplace) Regulations 1997 (as amended)} and that of `agency' work |
|
ii |
Review training and level of experience of current Inspecting Officers |
|
iii |
Review performance in relation to BVPI 147 (average time to issue fire safety certificates) |
|
iv |
Review current consultation arrangements with; Building Control, Environmental Health, Licensing and Registration Authorities. |
|
v |
Review the understanding of the Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations 1997 (as amended) by industry, trade and commerce |
|
vi |
Compare the Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service risk based inspection programme to that of other fire brigades |
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
Fire Investigation |
|
|
|
|
i |
Review the existing level of establishment within the Fire Investigation Team |
|
ii |
Review resource allocation and budgetary requirements of Fire Investigation |
|
iii |
Review training, experience levels and use of current Fire Investigation Officers. |
|
iv |
Review the number of investigations undertaken, in relation to the positive use of evidence |
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
Reduction in Unwanted Fire Alarm Calls |
|
|
|
|
i |
Review the Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service response to automatic fire alarms as compared to that of other brigades |
|
ii |
Review the Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service policy in dealing with persistent unwanted fire alarm call offenders |
|
iii |
Review current partnership working with other agencies in relation to unwanted fire calls |
|
|
|
5 |
ACTION PLAN |
|
|
|
In conjunction with the Terms of Reference, an action plan will need to prepared as part of the Best Value Review. It is suggested that the following areas are addressed: |
|
|
|
Phase 1 - Where are we now? |
|
|
|
· A brief description of the current services |
|
· The level and way the services are provided at present |
|
· Current aim and objectives |
|
· Existing performance indicators, targets and standards |
|
|
|
Phase 2 - What was found during the review? |
|
|
|
· Do we achieve our aims and objectives? |
|
· Why do we provide these services? |
|
· How do service users and others view our services? |
|
· How do we compare with best practice? |
|
· Are we competitive in the marketplace? |
|
|
|
Phase 3 - Where we want to go? |
|
|
|
· Should these services be provided at all? |
|
· Can these be achieved in a radically different way? |
|
· At what level and in what way? |
|
· What aims and objectives? |
|
· What performance indicators, targets and standards? |
|
|
|
Phase 4 - How will we get there? |
|
|
|
· What priorities and key tasks should we deliver? |
|
· What risks and obstacles will we tackle? |
|
· How will progress be reviewed? |
|
|
6 |
TIMETABLE |
|
|
|
It is suggested that the timetable for the review be as per Appendix A (Technical Fire Safety Plan) attached. |
|
|
7 |
REVIEW MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
The review will be managed through a Working Group, which will report to the Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service Best Value Committee on a regular basis. |
|
|
|
It is proposed that the Working Group include: |
|
|
|
Chairman |
DCFO John Bonney |
|
Elected Members |
TBN |
|
Deputy Chairman |
SDO Chris Bacon |
|
Review Manager |
ADO Mark Wittcomb |
|
Performance Review Manager |
Phil Webb |
|
Representative Bodies: |
Fire Brigades Union : TBN |
|
|
Unison : Sue Brumitt |
|
Customer Reps |
DO Martin Simpson ADO Chris Stephens |
|
|
Peter Chilvers (Winchester Building Control) |
|
Secretary |
TBN |
|
|
8 |
REVIEW MEETING DATES |
|
|
|
A draft schedule of meeting dates has been drawn up to coincide with the need for regular reports and updates to Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service committees and Service Management. |
|
|
|
Tuesday 09 07 02 |
|
Tuesday 06 08 02 |
|
Tuesday 10 09 02 |
|
Tuesday 08 10 02 |
|
Tuesday 05 11 02 |
|
Tuesday 10 12 02 |
|
|
|
Dates for 2003 to be confirmed in the later period of 2002. |
|
|
|
Further nominations for selected intermediate meetings to be confirmed where required. |
|
|
|
|
|
Assistant Divisional Officer Mark Wittcomb Review Manager |
|
May 2002 |