Archived decisions
Hampshire County Council | ||
Executive Member - Environment |
Item 4 | |
16 July 2002 | ||
Final Accounts 2001/02 | ||
Report of the County Treasurer, County Surveyor and County Planning Officer | ||
Contact: Ejner Knudsen, ext 7403
1 Summary
1.1 This report summarises the Environment Service's spending in 2001/02.
1.2 It recommends that the final accounts for 2001/02 be approved and that £18,000, representing the Service's 50% share of the underspending, be carried forward and added to the 2002/03 budget.
1.3 Overall there is a net underspending of £35,000 (0.05%) against the 2001/02 revenue cash limit of £71.4m.
1.4 The major variations are:
£'000 | |
Highways management and support services |
-86 |
Highways maintenance |
+19 |
Planning services |
+16 |
Other variations |
+16 |
-35 |
1.5 The County Council's policy is that 50% of any underspending should be added to the Service's budget in the following year. Cabinet decides what use should be made of the other 50%. It is proposed that the underspending be allocated to the highways management and support services to help meet the anticipated additional cost in 2002/03 of implementing the highways network management blueprint arrangements.
1.6 In considering the final outturn position compared with the Service's cash limit, variations in expenditure on highways winter maintenance (salting and snow clearance) are excluded. This is because special budgetary arrangements apply whereby any underspendings or overspendings against the winter maintenance budget provision, which is set at a level equivalent to average expenditure during the past four years, are reflected in the County Council's central balances. During 2001/02 winter maintenance expenditure totalled £1,516,000 which was £80,000 above the revised budget provision.
1.7 On capital, schemes to the value of £43.8m started in the year and schemes to the value of £4.1m have been approved by Cabinet to be carried forward to start in 2002/03.
1.8 In total, this exactly matches the overall 2001/02 level of capital programme resources of £47.9m. Additionally, schemes to the value of £5.1m, which were externally funded from developers and other contributions, were also started during the year.
1.9 Further details on the main differences between the actual revenue expenditure and the revised budget for cash limited expenditure are given in Part A below whilst details of revenue expenditure which is not included in the cash limit are contained in the appendices at the end of the report. Part B deals with capital schemes. Part C explains the basis of the financial control assurance statement included as Appendix 8.
2 Part A - Revenue Expenditure under the Service's control
2.1 Revenue expenditure under the Service's direct control is subject to a cash limit. For 2001/02 the adjusted amount is £71.4m as set out in Appendix 1.
2.2 The final outturn was £35,000 less than the cash limit. The overall position is analysed in Appendices 2 and 3. Appendix 4 includes a more detailed statement of variations from the revised budget.
2.3 The underspending in 2001/02 compares with the outturns achieved in recent years for the Environment Services (formerly under the control of Planning and Transportation Committee and Policy and Resources Committee) as set out in the following table:
Variations from Revised Budget | ||
£'000 |
% | |
1998/99 |
-92 |
-0.1 |
1999/00 |
-76 |
-0.1 |
2000/01 |
251 |
0.3 |
2001/02 |
-35 |
- |
The most significant elements within the total net underspending are explained in the following paragraphs.
Highways and Transportation Services
2.4 Cash limited revenue expenditure during 2001/02 on the highways and transportation services amounted to £36,669,000, an underspending of £56,000 (-0.2%).
2.5 The main variation on the highways and transportation services was on the budget for the management and support services, which mainly comprise the running costs of the County Surveyor's department together with professional and engineering services provided under the highways agency arrangements with the district councils. The 2001/02 outturn for this division of service showed an underspending of £86,000 (-0.6%) compared with the revised budget cash limit, being mainly attributable to savings from staff vacancies together with additional external income.
2.6 Expenditure on the highways maintenance revenue budget totalled £16,652,000, representing higher expenditure of just £19,000 (0.1%) compared to the final programme limit. A full analysis of the highways maintenance outturn compared to both the revised budget and the final approved works programme is provided in Appendix 5.
2.7 The final outturn on the budget for public transport support and co-ordination amounted to £4,812,000, an overspending of £6,000. The Executive Member will recall that the public transport budget had been under pressure during 2001/02 and that overspendings were projected in previous budget monitoring reports during the year. Corrective action was subsequently taken in the revised budget to increase the bus subsidies budget by allocating savings available from the former revenue budget provision for South Hampshire Rapid Transit and by making use of Rural Bus Subsidy Grant following changes in the rules governing the use of this support by the Government.
2.8 In the event, expenditure during 2001/02 on public transport was largely contained within the increased cash limit. Nevertheless the public transport budget remains under pressure in 2002/03. Although some basic housekeeping efficiencies have already been implemented since the 2002/03 budget was prepared, there remains a significant gap between the current level of budget provision and the projected cost of the subsidised bus services. The funding of this deficit, which is currently of the order of £300,000, will need to be addressed during the year. Pressure on bus subsidies was anticipated when the 2002/03 budget was agreed, and allowance was made as one of the possible calls on balances if this becomes necessary later in the year.
2.9 During 2001/02, the Government made Rural Bus Subsidy Grant of £1,142,000 available to the County Council. This sum was fully consumed in supporting the provision of rural bus services.
Planning Services
2.10 Expenditure on the planning services during 2001/02 totalled £4,090,000 which was £16,000 (0.4%) above the revised budget cash limit. The overspending mainly related to higher expenditure of £27,000 on the Dibden Bay inquiry where developments leading up to and during the initial stages of the inquiry necessitated additional consultancy support beyond the level anticipated when the budget was prepared. This additional expenditure was partially offset by a number of variations across other budget headings, including savings on employees' salaries, reflecting high levels of turnover during the year and difficulties in recruiting replacement staff.
Waste Management
Waste Contract Related Budget
2.11 Final expenditure against the 2001/02 waste management contract related budget totalled £28,593,000. This included an overall call of £2,937,000 on the central contingency held by the Cabinet, which was £97,000 more than earmarked for higher waste management costs during the year.
2.12 The over commitment against the central contingency was entirely related to the costs incurred, £112,000, of storing fridges for disposal during the final quarter of the year. Financial support of £120,000 from the Government for the same period was included in the revenue support grant settlement for 2002/03 and was subsequently added to the current year's central contingency provision for waste management. The £97,000 excess spend in 2001/02 will therefore be carried forward into the new year and will be a first call on the 2002/03 contingency allowance.
2.13 Aside from the fridge funding issue, the outturn for the year was very much in line with the overall budget provision. Household waste volumes were very marginally higher than waste levels in the previous year and thus were well within the tonnage estimate for 2001/02. The lower than anticipated cost of household waste disposal allowed the full cost of the Marchwood off-site highways works to be accommodated as well as prudent provisions to be included in the accounts in respect of unresolved contract claims.
2.14 Civic amenity waste levels were higher than budgeted including a significant increase in waste requiring landfill disposal due to difficulties with compost capacity during the first half of the year. However, the higher than expected costs that resulted were offset by lower incentive payments paid to the management contractors, higher trade waste income and the lower household waste costs referred to earlier.
Other Waste Management Budgets
2.15 Expenditure on the other waste management budgets was contained within the adjusted revised budget limit of £1,945,000. Administration budget savings of £14,000, mainly resulting from staff turnover, helped to offset minor excesses against abandoned vehicles, promotions and household waste recycling centre management costs.
2.16 The abandoned vehicles outturn allows fully for the returns submitted by district councils, who carry out this activity on behalf of the County Council. The recent audit of six of the 11 councils did impact to some degree on the year end returns, although discussions are still taking place with certain of the districts relating to recommendations arising from the audits. Audits of the remaining five districts are currently taking place. Once the audit process has been properly completed, a better picture of the likely cost outcome for 2002/03 will emerge.
Carry Forward to 2002/03 of Underspending
2.17 When the budget for 2002/03 was approved in January, a sum of £250,000 was redeployed within the overall base budget total to help to meet the additional costs, in the sort term, of implementing the Highways Network Best Value Review Blueprint for the future. Latest estimates suggest that the eventual cost this year may exceed the sum of £250,000 currently available in the 2002/03 budget. It is therefore recommended that any savings from 2001/02 which are returned to the Services by the Cabinet be allocated to the highways management and support services to help meet the above cost.
3 Part B - Capital expenditure 2001/02
3.1 The outturn for 2001/02 is set out below with details of the total resources and details of the individual schemes started in the year appearing in Appendix 7.
Locally Resourced Programme |
Supported by Government Approvals |
Total | |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | |
Total resources |
11,657 |
36,199 |
47,856 |
Value of schemes started in 2001/02 |
11,151 |
32,651 |
43,802 |
Value of schemes carried forward to 2002/03 |
506 |
3,548 |
4,054 |
Over/Undercommitment against the cash limit |
- |
- |
- |
3.2 The total starts limit for 2001/02 amounted to £47.9m and schemes to the value of £43.8m were started in the year.
3.3 Schemes with a total value of £4.1m, originally programmed to start in 2001/02 have been approved by the Cabinet to be carried forward to start in 2002/03. These and the reason for their delay are set out in Appendix 7.
3.4 The combined value of those schemes started and those approved to be carried forward to start in 2002/03 is £47.9m, which is equal to the programme cash limit. In addition schemes to the value of £5.1m, to be externally funded, were started during the year.
3.5 Total capital payments during 2001/02 amounted to £37.6m of which £3.0m is to be funded from external resources, including contributions from developers, district and parish councils, and Government and European grants. Payments on those capital programme schemes being funded from local County Council resources totalled £9.1m.
3.6 The balance of expenditure, £25.5m, is to be funded from supplementary credit approvals (SCA) provided by the Government.
4 Part C - Departmental Assurance Statement
4.1 The Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting with which the County Council's statement of accounts complies, introduces a new requirement from 2002/03 for the inclusion in the statement of account of an internal control statement, covering as a minimum the system of internal financial control. The statement sets out the framework within which financial control is managed and reviewed, including the arrangement for internal audit and reports on any identified weaknesses and the actions undertaken to rectify these.
4.2 It is proposed to introduce a statement of internal financial control in 2001/02's statement of account. As part of the process of enabling the County Treasurer to form a view on the effectiveness of internal financial control the Chief Internal Auditor has produced an independent assurance statement on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control in each department. Appendix 8 contains the statement relating to the Environment Service and concludes that an effective framework of control exists within the County Surveyor's and County Planning Departments.
Recommendations
That:
1 The final accounts for 2001/02 for the Environment service be approved.
2 That the Cabinet be requested to approve the carry forward of underspendings amounting to a net £18,000 as set out in paragraph 2.17.
3 The departmental assurance statement as set out in Appendix 8 be accepted.
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.
NB the list excludes:
1. Published works.
2. Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.
TITLE FILE
Summary of accounts
Summaries of Actual Spending 2001/02 | |
Appendix |
Contents |
1 |
Construction of the cash limit |
2 |
Summary of revenue expenditure |
3 |
Analysis of cash limited revenue expenditure over services |
4 |
Major variations in cash limited expenditure |
5 |
Summary showing detailed outturn on highways maintenance revenue budget |
6 |
Revenue expenditure 2001/02 not included in the cash limit |
7 |
Capital expenditure 2001/02 |
8 |
Departmental assurance statement |
Appendix 1
Environment Service
Revenue Expenditure 2001/02
Construction of Cash Limit
1 |
Revenue expenditure under the service's direct control was subject to a cash limit set by the Cabinet of £69,939,000 (excluding highways winter maintenance) reflecting the approved revised budget agreed by the Executive Member and the Cabinet during January | ||
2 |
The 2001/02 revised budget made recommendations for the carry forward to 2002/03 of planned underspendings totalling £642,000. This was subsequently approved by the Cabinet. The carried forward sum was allocated to cover items of expenditure that were to be deferred from 2001/02 together with other budget pressures that would need to be accommodated within the 2002/03 budget. | ||
3 |
Further changes have now been made increasing the final cash limit by £1,420,000. Adjustments include further allocations totalling £1,410,000 from the central waste management contingency to the waste management contacts related budget to cover estimated cost increases during the third and final quarters of the year. This fully allocates the contingency of £2,840,000 set aside in the County Council budget for this purpose, together with an additional sum of £97,000 from the support made available by the Government to cover the cost in 2001/02 of the storage of fridges. Other minor cash limit increases, totalling £10,000, include additions for sustainable development and IT charges higher pay costs, less an adjustment for lower business rates on the County Council's own properties, which could not be determined precisely when the revenue budget was set. | ||
4 |
No adjustments are required this year in respect of Rural Bus Subsidy Grant as the 2001/02 grant allocation of £1,142,000 has been fully utilised during the accounting period. | ||
5 |
The net effect of the above changes, which have been incorporated into the adjusted revised budget as shown in column 1 of Appendix 3, are summarised below: | ||
£'000 |
|||
Cash limit approved in the revised budget |
69,939 |
||
Waste Management Contingency Q3 |
747 |
||
Waste Management Contingency Q4 |
663 |
||
Sustainable Development |
4 |
||
IT charges - higher pay costs |
9 |
||
Business Rates - lower actual costs |
-3 |
||
Adjusted cash limit (excluding winter maintenance) |
71,359 |
||
Net Expenditure |
71,324 |
||
Net underspending against Service's controllable Expenditure |
-35 |
||
Appendix 2
Environment Service
Final Accounts 2001/02
Summary of Revenue Expenditure
(1) |
(2) |
(3) | ||
Adjusted Revised Estimate |
Actual 2001/02 |
Variation (Col 2-Col 1) | ||
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | ||
Cash limited expenditure |
71,359 |
71,324 |
-35 | |
Other expenditure which is the responsibility of the service |
||||
- Winter Maintenance |
1,436 |
1,516 |
80 | |
Sub total |
72,795 |
72,840 |
45 | |
Trading units Expenditure transferred from reserves - River Hamble |
41 |
31 |
-10 | |
Capital Charges |
17,687 |
17,687 |
- | |
Other expenditure which is controlled centrally by Policy and Resources |
||||
- |
Repair and maintenance of buildings |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
Central support services |
2,074 |
2,087 |
13 |
Less: |
||||
Expenditure controlled by this Service recharged to Policy and Resources: |
||||
- |
Corporate and Democratic Core |
-378 |
-378 |
- |
- |
Unapportionable overheads |
-197 |
-191 |
6 |
Flood Protection |
4,987 |
4,987 |
- | |
Government grants: |
||||
- |
Rural Bus Subsidy Grant |
-1,142 |
-1,142 |
- |
Total Net Expenditure |
95,868 |
95,922 |
54 | |
Reconciliation with total net expenditure in the budget book: |
||||
Net expenditure, per page B21 of the budget book |
95,523 |
|||
Adjustments |
||||
Variation in capital charges |
-1,075 |
|||
Waste Management Contract Related Services |
1,410 |
|||
Business Rates variation |
-3 |
|||
Other Variations |
13 |
|||
Total |
95,868 |
|||
Appendix 3
Environment Service
Revenue Expenditure 2001/02
Analysis of Cash Limited Expenditure over Services
(1) |
(2) |
(3) | |
Division of Service |
Adjusted Revised Estimate |
Actual 2001/02 |
Variation (Col 2 - Col 1) |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | |
Highways and Transportation |
|||
Highways Maintenance (excluding winter maintenance) |
16,633 |
16,652 |
19 |
Road Safety Education |
213 |
214 |
1 |
Traffic Surveys |
147 |
150 |
3 |
Parking Services |
-105 |
-104 |
1 |
Public Transport |
4,806 |
4,812 |
6 |
Rural Bus Subsidy Grant |
1,142 |
1,142 |
- |
Management and Support Services |
13,889 |
13,803 |
-86 |
36,725 |
36,669 |
-56 | |
Planning Services |
4,074 |
4,090 |
16 |
Waste Management |
|||
Contract related services |
28,593 |
28,593 |
- |
Other waste management services |
1,945 |
1,944 |
-1 |
30,538 |
30,537 |
-1 | |
Other Services |
|||
Reservoirs Act 1975 |
22 |
28 |
6 |
Total net expenditure (excluding Winter Maintenance) |
71,359 |
71,324 |
-35 |
Winter Maintenance |
1,436 |
1,516 |
80 |
Total |
72,795 |
72,840 |
45 |
Appendix 4
Environment Service
Revenue Expenditure 2001/02
Major variations in cash limited expenditure - underspending of £35,000
Budget Heading |
Variation |
Adjusted Revised Budget |
Reason |
£'000 |
£'000 |
||
Highways and Transportation |
|||
Highways Maintenance - County Roads and Bridges |
19 |
16,633 |
Lower expenditure on technical surveys (-£101,000) reflecting partial deferral of work to 2002/03. Resources were reallocated to meet higher expenditure on street lighting IT system development (+£49,000) additional depot maintenance (+£44,000) and increased spending on other routine maintenance activities (+£27,000) |
Public Transport |
6 |
4,806 |
Additional expenditure on community transport |
Management and support services |
-86 |
13,889 |
Main variations included an underspend on staff salaries |
Planning Services |
16 |
4,074 |
Additional expenditure on the employment of consultants for the Dibden Bay inquiry (+£27,000) and increased staff advertising (+£9,000). Partially offset by savings on employees' salaries (-£10,000), and lower expenditure on staff travel (-£10,000). |
Other Services |
|||
Reservoirs Act 1975 |
6 |
22 |
Additional expenditure in connection with the inspection of reservoirs. |
Appendix 5
Environment Service
Revenue Expenditure 2001/02
Summary showing detailed outturn on highways maintenance revenue budget
Operational Heading |
Approved Programme as at 15 Jan 2002 |
Final Programme |
Outturn 2001/02 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | |
Ordinary Maintenance |
|||
Routine carriageway and footways running repairs |
3,596 |
3,692 |
3,745 |
Gully emptying |
730 |
739 |
731 |
A321 routine maintenance - payment to Surrey County Council |
6 |
6 |
5 |
Material storage facility at Chesil Tunnel |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Aids to movement |
1,167 |
1,189 |
1,206 |
Traffic regulation orders |
349 |
349 |
355 |
Traffic signal maintenance |
260 |
260 |
266 |
Sign renewal and replacement |
150 |
150 |
150 |
Sign cleansing special programme |
- |
126 |
126 |
Intelligent transport systems |
171 |
171 |
133 |
Urban traffic control |
68 |
68 |
62 |
Traffic signals modifications |
217 |
217 |
257 |
Remote monitoring of traffic signals |
65 |
65 |
64 |
Rechargeable accident damage |
191 |
168 |
120 |
Grass cutting, trees and shrubs maintenance |
1,275 |
1,275 |
1,293 |
Hazard clearance (road traffic accidents) |
334 |
334 |
339 |
Weed control |
357 |
352 |
311 |
Arboricultural |
243 |
243 |
243 |
Travellers preventative measures |
10 |
8 |
3 |
Ecological verge cutting |
6 |
- |
4 |
District managed grass cutting |
399 |
399 |
399 |
Sub total - Ordinary Maintenance |
9,597 |
9,814 |
9,815 |
Street lighting and illuminated signs |
|||
Energy - street lights |
1,452 |
1,365 |
1,320 |
Energy - signs |
90 |
90 |
80 |
Energy - traffic signals |
175 |
175 |
175 |
Maintenance contract - street lights |
2,463 |
2,477 |
2,526 |
Maintenance contract - signs |
987 |
987 |
1,007 |
Special replacement programme - works |
1,079 |
1,095 |
1,112 |
Special replacement programme - scheme design fees |
49 |
49 |
53 |
Sub total - street lighting and illuminated signs |
6,295 |
6,238 |
6,273 |
Bridges |
|||
Routine maintenance |
67 |
56 |
56 |
Subway pumps - maintenance and energy |
43 |
43 |
43 |
Subway grafitti cleaning |
126 |
130 |
133 |
Railtrack charges |
68 |
63 |
61 |
Disused railway bridges |
9 |
6 |
1 |
Weight restriction signing |
5 |
8 |
(1) |
Footbridges |
90 |
102 |
107 |
Monitoring of sub-standard bridges |
11 |
11 |
5 |
Sub total - Bridges |
419 |
419 |
405 |
Other items |
|||
Technical surveys |
254 |
274 |
173 |
Depots maintenance |
120 |
155 |
199 |
Highways maintenance IT system development |
220 |
210 |
211 |
General reserves to meet unforeseen demands |
190 |
- |
- |
Sub total - other items |
784 |
639 |
583 |
Winter Maintenance |
1,436 |
1,436 |
1,516 |
Income |
|||
Depots net rentals |
-99 |
-124 |
-120 |
Rechargeable works |
-125 |
-125 |
-74 |
TMC contractor's use of radio system |
-60 |
-50 |
-51 |
Private street works interest from frontagers |
-6 |
-6 |
-3 |
Sub total - other items |
-290 |
-305 |
-248 |
Total highways maintenance programme |
18,241 |
18,241 |
18,344 |
Accounting adjustments relating to previous year |
-172 |
-172 |
-176 |
Total highways maintenance cash limit |
18,069 |
18,069 |
18,168 |
Appendix 6
Environment Service
Revenue Expenditure 2001/02 not included in the Cash Limit
1 |
Capital charges (£17.7m) |
Capital charges are made to services for capital assets used in the provision of services. The actual charges are £1.1m less than the budget which has been reduced to reflect the final charge to the Service. This will have no direct effect upon the overall budget requirements of the County Council as the capital charges are replaced by actual financing costs in the central asset management revenue account. | |
2 |
Central support services, repairs and maintenance of buildings (£2,088,000)
|
These items are within the control of Policy and Resources. Support services are apportioned to services in accordance with the level of services provided and office accommodation occupied. Control of the budget for repairs and maintenance of buildings is by the nature of work and where it is most required rather than by service. | |
3 |
Corporate and democratic care (recharge £378,000) and unapportionable overheads (recharge £191,000) |
These items cover management and support costs that relate to member support and advice and to pension costs for added years and early retirements. They are within this service's control and so are charged against the cash limit. But they are then recharged to Policy and Resources outside of the cash limit as the Best Value Accounting Code of Practice requires these to be excluded from the cost of services. | |
4 |
Flood Protection (£4,987,000) |
Flood defence expenditure representing annual levies on the County Council by the Environment Agency. | |
Appendix 7
Environment Service
Capital Programme 2001/02
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | ||
1 |
Construction of total resources |
|||
Approved programme limit - local resources |
11,780 | |||
Supplementary Credit Approvals (SCA): |
||||
Original settlement for 2001/02 |
23,450 |
|||
Starts to be supported from future SCA settlements |
3,925 |
|||
27,375 | ||||
Original Starts Programme in Budget Book |
39,155 | |||
Adjustments: |
||||
Flood damage SCA |
5,051 |
|||
Air quality monitoring SCA |
29 |
|||
Contaminated land SCA |
1,767 |
|||
Coast Protection Act SCA |
216 |
|||
Schemes brought forward from 2000/01 |
1,997 |
|||
Transfer from Planning Services Revenue Budget to Environmental Improvements |
99 |
|||
Transfer from Highways Minor Works to Planning Services Conservation and Environmental Improvements Revenue Budget |
-120 |
|||
Absorption of 2000/01 Revenue Budget Overspending |
-257 |
|||
Transfer re Improvements Works to Jacobs Gutter Lane |
-200 |
|||
Subsequent adjustments to starts programme being supported from SCA settlements approved by Executive Member |
119 |
|||
Total Adjustments |
8,701 | |||
Total Starts Programme Limit |
47,856 | |||
2 |
Schemes started during 2001/02 |
|||
SCA Schemes |
||||
Structural Maintenance of Bridges and Roads |
||||
Bridges assessment and strengthening |
2,080 |
|||
Bridges structural maintenance |
770 |
|||
Principal road structural maintenance |
4,960 |
|||
Non principal road structural maintenance |
5,160 |
|||
Flood damage repairs to roads and bridges |
5,051 |
|||
Hythe Pier maintenance |
400 |
18,421 | ||
Casualty Reduction Programme |
||||
Low cost safety schemes |
910 |
|||
M27 Junction 7, Hedge End |
55 |
|||
Lower Farnham Road, Aldershot |
200 |
|||
A339 Route Strategy (B3406-C70) |
22 |
|||
Refurbishment and betterment |
120 |
1,307 | ||
Area Strategies |
||||
Andover Area (ATS) |
||||
Salisbury Road/Millway Road, Andover (net) |
400 |
|||
Weyhill to Portway Cycle Scheme (net) |
31 |
|||
Andover Station cycle facilities |
15 |
|||
Salisbury Road, Andover - Toucan Crossing |
40 |
|||
Tollgate Road, Andover - Refuge |
10 |
|||
King Arthur's Way, Andover - Street lighting |
80 |
576 | ||
Basingstoke (BEST) |
||||
A30 Strategy, Ringway to Winton Square - Part 2 |
500 |
|||
A30 Speed Regime, Basingstoke |
10 |
|||
BEST Intelligent Transport Systems |
125 |
|||
Buckskin Lane, Basingstoke - Pelican Crossing |
60 |
|||
BEST Rural Schemes |
50 |
|||
Harrow Way, Basingstoke - Toucan Crossing |
130 |
|||
BEST Safer Routes to School |
20 |
895 | ||
Central Hampshire (CHARTS) |
||||
Petersfield town centre - Stage 2 |
200 |
|||
A325 Whitehill traffic management - Stage 2 |
90 |
|||
Petersfield railway station modal integration |
34 |
|||
Modal integration at other railway stations |
26 |
|||
Liphook traffic management (net) |
20 |
|||
CHARTS air quality monitoring |
79 |
|||
CHARTS safer routes to school |
50 |
499 | ||
Coastal Towns (CTTS) |
||||
Lymington Quay |
50 |
|||
Milford Village Centre |
10 |
|||
Avenue Road/Southampton Road, Lymington |
110 |
|||
New Milton railway station facilities |
20 |
190 | ||
North East Hampshire (NEHTS) |
||||
Modal integration at railway stations |
70 |
|||
Minley Road, Farnborough - cycles and pedestrians (net) |
30 |
|||
Farnborough Gate cycle scheme - stage 2 |
32 |
|||
NEHTS Health and Environment |
50 |
|||
NEHTS decriminalised parking |
200 |
|||
Trunk Road, Farnborough - safer routes to school |
105 |
|||
NEHTS safer routes to school |
50 |
537 | ||
New Forest (NFTS) |
||||
Brockenhurst traffic management school safety zone |
70 |
|||
Northfield Road, Ringwood - safe routes to school stage 2 |
15 |
|||
Station Road/Westbeams Road, Sway |
35 |
|||
Sway and Hinton Admiral railway stations facilities |
15 |
135 | ||
South West Hampshire (SWHTS) |
||||
Eastleigh Bus Station - stage 2 |
180 |
|||
Eastleigh Bus Quality Partnership |
100 |
|||
A35 Salisbury Road, Totton - cycleway |
35 |
|||
Botley Road, Fair Oak - Pelican Crossing |
35 |
|||
Romsey safer routes to school |
30 |
|||
Doncaster Drove, Eastleigh (net) |
41 |
421 | ||
South East Hampshire (SEHTS) |
||||
A3 Corridor Bus Priority, Widley to Purbrook - part 2 |
3,650 |
|||
Gosport Ferry Interchange |
20 |
|||
Fareham Bus Station facilities |
70 |
|||
Gosport Bus Station facilities |
60 |
|||
Fareham/Gosport Bus Stops |
50 |
|||
Gosport Bus Station CCTV |
30 |
|||
Kiln Road/North Hill/Old Turnpike Road, Fareham (net) |
40 |
|||
Shopmobility, Fareham |
35 |
|||
Whitworth Road/Spring Gardens/South Street, Gosport |
55 |
|||
Leesland cycle track |
20 |
|||
Lee-On-Solent High Street - CCTV |
40 |
|||
Stokes Bay, Gosport - refuge |
15 |
|||
Howe Road, Gosport |
22 |
|||
Hayling Billy cycle route, Havant - road crossing |
60 |
|||
Crookhorn Lane, Purbrook cycle track (net) |
25 |
|||
Leigh Park to Portsmouth Bus Corridor |
155 |
|||
Lee to Browndown cycle scheme |
240 |
|||
Emsworth railway station facilities |
15 |
|||
SEHTS safer routes to school |
150 |
4,752 | ||
Western Hampshire (WHTS) |
||||
Andover to Salisbury bus quality partnership |
20 |
|||
Kings Somborne village |
35 |
55 | ||
Winchester (WMAP) |
||||
Bar End Park and Ride extension (net) |
650 |
|||
WMAP car parking improvements |
50 |
|||
WMAP intelligent transport systems |
50 |
|||
WMAP pedestrian and cycle schemes |
130 |
|||
WMAP air quality monitoring |
20 |
|||
WMAP safer routes to school |
50 |
950 | ||
Other Priority Schemes |
||||
A30 Dorchester Arms Junction improvement (net) |
265 |
265 | ||
Minor Works |
||||
Lymington Road, Milford-On-Sea, pelican crossing |
30 |
|||
Havant Road, Hayling Island - pelican crossing |
30 |
|||
Griffin Road, Hook - pelican crossing |
35 |
|||
London Road, Hook - pelican crossing |
30 |
|||
Ashley Road, New Milton - pelican crossing |
30 |
|||
Southampton Road, Hythe - toucan crossing |
77 |
|||
Wellington Avenue, Aldershot - pelican crossing (net) |
23 |
|||
Community Safety Initiative |
60 |
|||
Rural Partnership Schemes |
140 |
|||
Minor improvements |
280 |
|||
Community transport schemes |
250 |
|||
Public transport information |
125 |
|||
Remote monitoring equipment |
200 |
|||
Intelligent transport systems |
275 |
1,585 | ||
Other |
||||
Buriton landfill site |
20 |
|||
Westwood landfill site |
27 |
|||
Efford landfill site |
1,800 |
|||
Coast Protection Act |
216 |
2,063 |
||
Total SCA Schemes |
32,651 | |||
Locally Funded Schemes |
||||
Structural maintenance of non principal roads |
10,029 |
|||
Environmental improvements |
253 |
|||
Regeneration of older urban areas |
812 |
|||
Landfill remedial works |
57 |
11,151 |
||
Total Locally Funded Schemes |
11,151 | |||
Total of Schemes Started During the Year |
43,802 | |||
3 |
Schemes Carried Forward |
||
Scheme Title |
£'000 |
Reason for Delay | |
B3058 Bashley Crossroads, New Milton |
240 |
To enable scheme to be constructed outside holiday season | |
North West Quadrant, Basingstoke |
250 |
Further public consultation necessary | |
High Street and The Square, Petersfield |
365 |
Late addition to the programme | |
Otterbourne traffic calming stage 2 |
575 |
Modification to design required following public consultation | |
A325/A30 Blackwater Valley Route 1 Bus priority corridor |
850 |
Additional funding required | |
Lynchford Road, Farnborough - toucan crossing |
50 |
Late addition to the programme | |
A27 Portchester Road, Fareham |
510 |
Modification to design required following public consultation | |
Fareham railway station |
25 |
Scheme deferred to coincide with South West Train's programme | |
Titchfield Road, Stubbington |
35 |
Major objections to scheme | |
Christchurch Road, New Milton |
30 |
Scheme design being reviewed | |
Traffic Enforcement technology |
30 |
Amount held in reserve - scheme expected to be self funding | |
B3006 Route Strategy, Empshott |
23 |
Scheme being developed in conjunction with Transport Research Laboratory | |
Fawley/Calshot Cycle Scheme |
80 |
Land required from developer | |
Hythe to Dibden Cycle Scheme |
85 |
Design delayed by the need for public consultation | |
Eastleigh safer routes to schools |
165 |
Consultations with schools | |
Romsey safer routes to schools |
170 |
Consultations with schools | |
Test Valley School, Stockbridge - stage 2 |
20 |
Traffic Regulation Order required | |
Stockbridge village centre |
25 |
Late addition to the programme | |
Cycle parking - Hart and Rushmoor |
20 |
Late addition to the programme | |
Structural maintenance of roads |
174 |
Uncommitted balance to be carried forward | |
Regeneration of older urban areas |
332 |
Uncommitted balance to be carried forward | |
4,054 |
|||
Externally Funded Schemes Started in 2001/02 |
||
£'000 |
||
Andover Area (ATS) |
||
Salisbury Road/Millway Road, Andover (contribution) |
165 |
|
Weyhill to Portway Cycle Scheme (contribution) |
63 |
|
Basingstoke (BEST) |
||
Bramley traffic calming |
120 |
|
Old Basing traffic calming |
125 |
|
Brimpton Road, Baughurst |
36 |
|
A33 Chineham Footway and Cycleway |
10 |
|
Central Hampshire (CHARTS) |
||
Liphook traffic management (contribution) |
28 |
|
Fletchers Field, Liphook - cycleway links |
23 |
|
North East Hampshire (NEHTS) |
||
Minley Road, Farnborough - cycles and pedestrians (contribution) |
27 |
|
Boxalls Lane, Aldershot - traffic calming |
100 |
|
A325 Rectory Road, Farnborough - traffic management stage 2 |
80 |
|
Garrison Church, Aldershot - toucan crossing |
55 |
|
Wellington Avenue, Aldershot - cycle route |
30 |
|
A30 Blackwater Stage 3b - Kings Parade |
250 |
|
Elvetham Road, Fleet - traffic calming |
150 |
|
School Lane, Yateley - pedestrian facilities |
25 |
|
New Forest (NFHT) |
||
Brockenhurst station interchange |
140 |
|
Woodstock Lane, Ringwood (contribution) |
18 |
|
South West Hampshire Area (SWHTS) |
||
Fair Oak Road, Fair Oak - toucan crossing |
46 |
|
Sylvan Drive, North Baddesley |
80 |
|
Doncaster Drove, Eastleigh (contribution) |
149 |
|
South East Hampshire (SEHTS) |
||
Kiln Road/North Hill/Old Turnpike Road, Fareham (contribution) |
70 |
|
Crookhorn Lane, Purbrook Cycle Track (contribution) |
18 |
|
A3051 Burridge to Curbridge traffic management |
50 |
|
Warsash Road/Locks Road, Warsash |
140 |
|
Whiteley Bus infrastructure |
100 |
|
Whiteley/Segensworth signing |
190 |
|
FWW Western Distributor Road - Dibles Road to Schooner Way |
600 |
|
Green Pond Corner, Warblington |
17 |
|
Winchester (WMAP) |
||
Bar End park and ride extension (contributions) |
2,150 |
|
£'000 |
||
Other Priority Schemes |
||
A30 Dorchester Arms junction improvement (contribution) |
50 |
|
Minor Works |
||
Wellington Avenue, Aldershot - pelican crossing (contribution) |
10 |
|
5,115 |
||
Appendix 8
Environment Service
Departmental Assurance Statement
1 |
Introduction |
1.1 |
The Accounts and Audit Regulation 1996 require the County Treasurer to maintain an adequate and effective internal audit. |
1.2 |
The County Treasurer employs an in-house internal audit section to provide an independent and objective appraisal function of reviewing the system of internal control. It examines, evaluates and reports to Chief Officers and the County Treasurer on the adequacy of the internal control as a contribution to the proper economic, efficient and effective use of resources. |
1.3 |
From 2002/03 The Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the UK requires that the Chief Internal Auditor provides an independent opinion on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal financial control operating in the County Council. The County Treasurer has sought to develop this for 2001/02 in preparation for the full requirement next year. To enable him to do this, an independent opinion on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control has been prepared for each department. |
2 |
Responsibilities |
2.1 |
It is a management responsibility to develop and maintain the internal control framework, and to ensure that resources are properly applied in the manner and on the activities intended. It is the responsibility of Internal Audit to form an independent opinion, based on reviews during the year, on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control. |
3 |
Basis of opinion |
3.1 |
The strategic and annual internal audit plans were prepared by the Chief Internal Auditor to take account of the characteristics and relative risks of the activities involved and were approved by the County Treasurer. |
3.2 |
The internal audit plan has been delivered in accordance with the Auditing Practices Board's Guideline number 308, `Guidance for Internal Auditors'. |
3.3 |
Work has been planned and performed so as to obtain all the information and explanations which were considered necessary in order to provide sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the internal control system is operating effectively. However, this assurance can never be absolute. The most that the internal audit service can do is to provide reasonable assurance that there are no major weaknesses in the system of control. |
4 |
Opinion |
4.1 |
In our opinion the County Surveyor's and County Planning Departments have an effective framework of control which provides reasonable assurance regarding the effective, efficient and economic achievement of the department's objectives. |
Ejner Knudsen Chief Internal Auditor County Treasurer's Department Hampshire County Council |