Archived decisions

Hampshire County Council

Executive Member - Environment

Item 4

16 July 2002

Final Accounts 2001/02

Report of the County Treasurer, County Surveyor and County Planning Officer

Contact: Ejner Knudsen, ext 7403

1 Summary

1.1 This report summarises the Environment Service's spending in 2001/02.

1.2 It recommends that the final accounts for 2001/02 be approved and that £18,000, representing the Service's 50% share of the underspending, be carried forward and added to the 2002/03 budget.

1.3 Overall there is a net underspending of £35,000 (0.05%) against the 2001/02 revenue cash limit of £71.4m.

1.4 The major variations are:

 

£'000

Highways management and support services

-86

Highways maintenance

+19

Planning services

+16

Other variations

+16

 

-35

1.5 The County Council's policy is that 50% of any underspending should be added to the Service's budget in the following year. Cabinet decides what use should be made of the other 50%. It is proposed that the underspending be allocated to the highways management and support services to help meet the anticipated additional cost in 2002/03 of implementing the highways network management blueprint arrangements.

1.6 In considering the final outturn position compared with the Service's cash limit, variations in expenditure on highways winter maintenance (salting and snow clearance) are excluded. This is because special budgetary arrangements apply whereby any underspendings or overspendings against the winter maintenance budget provision, which is set at a level equivalent to average expenditure during the past four years, are reflected in the County Council's central balances. During 2001/02 winter maintenance expenditure totalled £1,516,000 which was £80,000 above the revised budget provision.

1.7 On capital, schemes to the value of £43.8m started in the year and schemes to the value of £4.1m have been approved by Cabinet to be carried forward to start in 2002/03.

1.8 In total, this exactly matches the overall 2001/02 level of capital programme resources of £47.9m. Additionally, schemes to the value of £5.1m, which were externally funded from developers and other contributions, were also started during the year.

1.9 Further details on the main differences between the actual revenue expenditure and the revised budget for cash limited expenditure are given in Part A below whilst details of revenue expenditure which is not included in the cash limit are contained in the appendices at the end of the report. Part B deals with capital schemes. Part C explains the basis of the financial control assurance statement included as Appendix 8.

2 Part A - Revenue Expenditure under the Service's control

2.1 Revenue expenditure under the Service's direct control is subject to a cash limit. For 2001/02 the adjusted amount is £71.4m as set out in Appendix 1.

2.2 The final outturn was £35,000 less than the cash limit. The overall position is analysed in Appendices 2 and 3. Appendix 4 includes a more detailed statement of variations from the revised budget.

2.3 The underspending in 2001/02 compares with the outturns achieved in recent years for the Environment Services (formerly under the control of Planning and Transportation Committee and Policy and Resources Committee) as set out in the following table:

 

Variations from Revised Budget

 

£'000

%

1998/99

-92

-0.1

1999/00

-76

-0.1

2000/01

251

0.3

2001/02

-35

-

    The most significant elements within the total net underspending are explained in the following paragraphs.

    Highways and Transportation Services

2.4 Cash limited revenue expenditure during 2001/02 on the highways and transportation services amounted to £36,669,000, an underspending of £56,000 (-0.2%).

2.5 The main variation on the highways and transportation services was on the budget for the management and support services, which mainly comprise the running costs of the County Surveyor's department together with professional and engineering services provided under the highways agency arrangements with the district councils. The 2001/02 outturn for this division of service showed an underspending of £86,000 (-0.6%) compared with the revised budget cash limit, being mainly attributable to savings from staff vacancies together with additional external income.

2.6 Expenditure on the highways maintenance revenue budget totalled £16,652,000, representing higher expenditure of just £19,000 (0.1%) compared to the final programme limit. A full analysis of the highways maintenance outturn compared to both the revised budget and the final approved works programme is provided in Appendix 5.

2.7 The final outturn on the budget for public transport support and co-ordination amounted to £4,812,000, an overspending of £6,000. The Executive Member will recall that the public transport budget had been under pressure during 2001/02 and that overspendings were projected in previous budget monitoring reports during the year. Corrective action was subsequently taken in the revised budget to increase the bus subsidies budget by allocating savings available from the former revenue budget provision for South Hampshire Rapid Transit and by making use of Rural Bus Subsidy Grant following changes in the rules governing the use of this support by the Government.

2.8 In the event, expenditure during 2001/02 on public transport was largely contained within the increased cash limit. Nevertheless the public transport budget remains under pressure in 2002/03. Although some basic housekeeping efficiencies have already been implemented since the 2002/03 budget was prepared, there remains a significant gap between the current level of budget provision and the projected cost of the subsidised bus services. The funding of this deficit, which is currently of the order of £300,000, will need to be addressed during the year. Pressure on bus subsidies was anticipated when the 2002/03 budget was agreed, and allowance was made as one of the possible calls on balances if this becomes necessary later in the year.

2.9 During 2001/02, the Government made Rural Bus Subsidy Grant of £1,142,000 available to the County Council. This sum was fully consumed in supporting the provision of rural bus services.

    Planning Services

2.10 Expenditure on the planning services during 2001/02 totalled £4,090,000 which was £16,000 (0.4%) above the revised budget cash limit. The overspending mainly related to higher expenditure of £27,000 on the Dibden Bay inquiry where developments leading up to and during the initial stages of the inquiry necessitated additional consultancy support beyond the level anticipated when the budget was prepared. This additional expenditure was partially offset by a number of variations across other budget headings, including savings on employees' salaries, reflecting high levels of turnover during the year and difficulties in recruiting replacement staff.

    Waste Management

    Waste Contract Related Budget

2.11 Final expenditure against the 2001/02 waste management contract related budget totalled £28,593,000. This included an overall call of £2,937,000 on the central contingency held by the Cabinet, which was £97,000 more than earmarked for higher waste management costs during the year.

2.12 The over commitment against the central contingency was entirely related to the costs incurred, £112,000, of storing fridges for disposal during the final quarter of the year. Financial support of £120,000 from the Government for the same period was included in the revenue support grant settlement for 2002/03 and was subsequently added to the current year's central contingency provision for waste management. The £97,000 excess spend in 2001/02 will therefore be carried forward into the new year and will be a first call on the 2002/03 contingency allowance.

2.13 Aside from the fridge funding issue, the outturn for the year was very much in line with the overall budget provision. Household waste volumes were very marginally higher than waste levels in the previous year and thus were well within the tonnage estimate for 2001/02. The lower than anticipated cost of household waste disposal allowed the full cost of the Marchwood off-site highways works to be accommodated as well as prudent provisions to be included in the accounts in respect of unresolved contract claims.

2.14 Civic amenity waste levels were higher than budgeted including a significant increase in waste requiring landfill disposal due to difficulties with compost capacity during the first half of the year. However, the higher than expected costs that resulted were offset by lower incentive payments paid to the management contractors, higher trade waste income and the lower household waste costs referred to earlier.

    Other Waste Management Budgets

2.15 Expenditure on the other waste management budgets was contained within the adjusted revised budget limit of £1,945,000. Administration budget savings of £14,000, mainly resulting from staff turnover, helped to offset minor excesses against abandoned vehicles, promotions and household waste recycling centre management costs.

2.16 The abandoned vehicles outturn allows fully for the returns submitted by district councils, who carry out this activity on behalf of the County Council. The recent audit of six of the 11 councils did impact to some degree on the year end returns, although discussions are still taking place with certain of the districts relating to recommendations arising from the audits. Audits of the remaining five districts are currently taking place. Once the audit process has been properly completed, a better picture of the likely cost outcome for 2002/03 will emerge.

    Carry Forward to 2002/03 of Underspending

2.17 When the budget for 2002/03 was approved in January, a sum of £250,000 was redeployed within the overall base budget total to help to meet the additional costs, in the sort term, of implementing the Highways Network Best Value Review Blueprint for the future. Latest estimates suggest that the eventual cost this year may exceed the sum of £250,000 currently available in the 2002/03 budget. It is therefore recommended that any savings from 2001/02 which are returned to the Services by the Cabinet be allocated to the highways management and support services to help meet the above cost.

3 Part B - Capital expenditure 2001/02

3.1 The outturn for 2001/02 is set out below with details of the total resources and details of the individual schemes started in the year appearing in Appendix 7.

 

Locally Resourced Programme

Supported by Government Approvals

Total

 

£'000

£'000

£'000

       

Total resources

11,657

36,199

47,856

Value of schemes started in 2001/02

11,151

32,651

43,802

Value of schemes carried forward to 2002/03

506

3,548

4,054

Over/Undercommitment against the cash limit

-

-

-

       

3.2 The total starts limit for 2001/02 amounted to £47.9m and schemes to the value of £43.8m were started in the year.

3.3 Schemes with a total value of £4.1m, originally programmed to start in 2001/02 have been approved by the Cabinet to be carried forward to start in 2002/03. These and the reason for their delay are set out in Appendix 7.

3.4 The combined value of those schemes started and those approved to be carried forward to start in 2002/03 is £47.9m, which is equal to the programme cash limit. In addition schemes to the value of £5.1m, to be externally funded, were started during the year.

3.5 Total capital payments during 2001/02 amounted to £37.6m of which £3.0m is to be funded from external resources, including contributions from developers, district and parish councils, and Government and European grants. Payments on those capital programme schemes being funded from local County Council resources totalled £9.1m.

3.6 The balance of expenditure, £25.5m, is to be funded from supplementary credit approvals (SCA) provided by the Government.

4 Part C - Departmental Assurance Statement

4.1 The Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting with which the County Council's statement of accounts complies, introduces a new requirement from 2002/03 for the inclusion in the statement of account of an internal control statement, covering as a minimum the system of internal financial control. The statement sets out the framework within which financial control is managed and reviewed, including the arrangement for internal audit and reports on any identified weaknesses and the actions undertaken to rectify these.

4.2 It is proposed to introduce a statement of internal financial control in 2001/02's statement of account. As part of the process of enabling the County Treasurer to form a view on the effectiveness of internal financial control the Chief Internal Auditor has produced an independent assurance statement on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control in each department. Appendix 8 contains the statement relating to the Environment Service and concludes that an effective framework of control exists within the County Surveyor's and County Planning Departments.

Recommendations

That:

1 The final accounts for 2001/02 for the Environment service be approved.

2 That the Cabinet be requested to approve the carry forward of underspendings amounting to a net £18,000 as set out in paragraph 2.17.

3 The departmental assurance statement as set out in Appendix 8 be accepted.

Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers

The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.

NB the list excludes:

1. Published works.

2. Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.

    TITLE FILE

    Summary of accounts

Summaries of Actual Spending 2001/02

Appendix

Contents

   

1

Construction of the cash limit

2

Summary of revenue expenditure

3

Analysis of cash limited revenue expenditure over services

4

Major variations in cash limited expenditure

5

Summary showing detailed outturn on highways maintenance revenue budget

6

Revenue expenditure 2001/02 not included in the cash limit

7

Capital expenditure 2001/02

8

Departmental assurance statement

Appendix 1

Environment Service

Revenue Expenditure 2001/02

Construction of Cash Limit

1

Revenue expenditure under the service's direct control was subject to a cash limit set by the Cabinet of £69,939,000 (excluding highways winter maintenance) reflecting the approved revised budget agreed by the Executive Member and the Cabinet during January

2

The 2001/02 revised budget made recommendations for the carry forward to 2002/03 of planned underspendings totalling £642,000. This was subsequently approved by the Cabinet. The carried forward sum was allocated to cover items of expenditure that were to be deferred from 2001/02 together with other budget pressures that would need to be accommodated within the 2002/03 budget.

3

Further changes have now been made increasing the final cash limit by £1,420,000. Adjustments include further allocations totalling £1,410,000 from the central waste management contingency to the waste management contacts related budget to cover estimated cost increases during the third and final quarters of the year. This fully allocates the contingency of £2,840,000 set aside in the County Council budget for this purpose, together with an additional sum of £97,000 from the support made available by the Government to cover the cost in 2001/02 of the storage of fridges. Other minor cash limit increases, totalling £10,000, include additions for sustainable development and IT charges higher pay costs, less an adjustment for lower business rates on the County Council's own properties, which could not be determined precisely when the revenue budget was set.

4

No adjustments are required this year in respect of Rural Bus Subsidy Grant as the 2001/02 grant allocation of £1,142,000 has been fully utilised during the accounting period.

5

The net effect of the above changes, which have been incorporated into the adjusted revised budget as shown in column 1 of Appendix 3, are summarised below:

   

£'000

 
 

Cash limit approved in the revised budget

69,939

 
 

Waste Management Contingency Q3

747

 
 

Waste Management Contingency Q4

663

 
 

Sustainable Development

4

 
 

IT charges - higher pay costs

9

 
 

Business Rates - lower actual costs

-3

 
 

Adjusted cash limit (excluding winter maintenance)

71,359

 
 

Net Expenditure

71,324

 
 

Net underspending against Service's controllable Expenditure

-35

 

Appendix 2

Environment Service

Final Accounts 2001/02

Summary of Revenue Expenditure

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

 

Adjusted Revised Estimate

Actual 2001/02

Variation

(Col 2-Col 1)

 

£'000

£'000

£'000

       

Cash limited expenditure

71,359

71,324

-35

       

Other expenditure which is the responsibility of the service

     

- Winter Maintenance

1,436

1,516

80

Sub total

72,795

72,840

45

       

Trading units Expenditure transferred from reserves - River Hamble

41

31

-10

       

Capital Charges

17,687

17,687

-

       

Other expenditure which is controlled centrally by Policy and Resources

     

-

Repair and maintenance of buildings

1

1

-

-

Central support services

2,074

2,087

13

       

Less:

     

Expenditure controlled by this Service recharged to Policy and Resources:

     

-

Corporate and Democratic Core

-378

-378

-

-

Unapportionable overheads

-197

-191

6

       

Flood Protection

4,987

4,987

-

       

Government grants:

     

-

Rural Bus Subsidy Grant

-1,142

-1,142

-

       

Total Net Expenditure

95,868

95,922

54

       
       
       
       
       
       

Reconciliation with total net expenditure in the budget book:

     
       

Net expenditure, per page B21 of the budget book

95,523

   
       

Adjustments

     

Variation in capital charges

-1,075

   

Waste Management Contract Related Services

1,410

   

Business Rates variation

-3

   

Other Variations

13

   
       

Total

95,868

   
       

Appendix 3

Environment Service

Revenue Expenditure 2001/02

Analysis of Cash Limited Expenditure over Services

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

Division of Service

Adjusted Revised Estimate

Actual 2001/02

Variation (Col 2 - Col 1)

 

£'000

£'000

£'000

       

Highways and Transportation

     

Highways Maintenance (excluding winter maintenance)

16,633

16,652

19

       

Road Safety Education

213

214

1

Traffic Surveys

147

150

3

Parking Services

-105

-104

1

       

Public Transport

4,806

4,812

6

Rural Bus Subsidy Grant

1,142

1,142

-

       

Management and Support Services

13,889

13,803

-86

       
 

36,725

36,669

-56

       

Planning Services

4,074

4,090

16

       

Waste Management

     

Contract related services

28,593

28,593

-

Other waste management services

1,945

1,944

-1

 

30,538

30,537

-1

       

Other Services

     

Reservoirs Act 1975

22

28

6

       

Total net expenditure (excluding Winter Maintenance)

71,359

71,324

-35

       

Winter Maintenance

1,436

1,516

80

       

Total

72,795

72,840

45

       
       

Appendix 4

Environment Service

Revenue Expenditure 2001/02

Major variations in cash limited expenditure - underspending of £35,000

Budget Heading

Variation

Adjusted Revised Budget

Reason

 

£'000

£'000

 

Highways and Transportation

     

Highways Maintenance - County Roads and Bridges

19

16,633

Lower expenditure on technical surveys (-£101,000) reflecting partial deferral of work to 2002/03. Resources were reallocated to meet higher expenditure on street lighting IT system development (+£49,000) additional depot maintenance (+£44,000) and increased spending on other routine maintenance activities (+£27,000)

Public Transport

6

4,806

Additional expenditure on community transport

Management and support services

-86

13,889

Main variations included an underspend on staff salaries
(-£101,000) reflecting continuing recruitment difficulties, additional income (-£83,000), mainly from land search fees and road space charges, partially offset by additional expenditure on information technology and other minor variations (+£98,000)

Planning Services

16

4,074

Additional expenditure on the employment of consultants for the Dibden Bay inquiry (+£27,000) and increased staff advertising (+£9,000). Partially offset by savings on employees' salaries (-£10,000), and lower expenditure on staff travel (-£10,000).

       
       

Other Services

     
       

Reservoirs Act 1975

6

22

Additional expenditure in connection with the inspection of reservoirs.

       

Appendix 5

Environment Service

Revenue Expenditure 2001/02

Summary showing detailed outturn on highways maintenance revenue budget

Operational Heading

Approved Programme as at

15 Jan 2002

Final Programme

Outturn 2001/02

 

£'000

£'000

£'000

Ordinary Maintenance

     

Routine carriageway and footways running repairs

3,596

3,692

3,745

Gully emptying

730

739

731

A321 routine maintenance - payment to Surrey County Council

6

6

5

Material storage facility at Chesil Tunnel

3

3

3

       

Aids to movement

1,167

1,189

1,206

Traffic regulation orders

349

349

355

Traffic signal maintenance

260

260

266

Sign renewal and replacement

150

150

150

Sign cleansing special programme

-

126

126

Intelligent transport systems

171

171

133

Urban traffic control

68

68

62

Traffic signals modifications

217

217

257

Remote monitoring of traffic signals

65

65

64

Rechargeable accident damage

191

168

120

       

Grass cutting, trees and shrubs maintenance

1,275

1,275

1,293

Hazard clearance (road traffic accidents)

334

334

339

Weed control

357

352

311

Arboricultural

243

243

243

Travellers preventative measures

10

8

3

Ecological verge cutting

6

-

4

       

District managed grass cutting

399

399

399

       

Sub total - Ordinary Maintenance

9,597

9,814

9,815

       
       
       
       
       
       
       

Street lighting and illuminated signs

     
       

Energy - street lights

1,452

1,365

1,320

Energy - signs

90

90

80

Energy - traffic signals

175

175

175

       

Maintenance contract - street lights

2,463

2,477

2,526

Maintenance contract - signs

987

987

1,007

       

Special replacement programme - works

1,079

1,095

1,112

Special replacement programme - scheme design fees

49

49

53

       

Sub total - street lighting and illuminated signs

6,295

6,238

6,273

       

Bridges

     

Routine maintenance

67

56

56

Subway pumps - maintenance and energy

43

43

43

Subway grafitti cleaning

126

130

133

Railtrack charges

68

63

61

Disused railway bridges

9

6

1

Weight restriction signing

5

8

(1)

Footbridges

90

102

107

Monitoring of sub-standard bridges

11

11

5

       

Sub total - Bridges

419

419

405

       
       

Other items

     

Technical surveys

254

274

173

Depots maintenance

120

155

199

Highways maintenance IT system development

220

210

211

       

General reserves to meet unforeseen demands

190

-

-

       

Sub total - other items

784

639

583

       
       

Winter Maintenance

1,436

1,436

1,516

       
       
       
       
       
       

Income

     

Depots net rentals

-99

-124

-120

Rechargeable works

-125

-125

-74

TMC contractor's use of radio system

-60

-50

-51

Private street works interest from frontagers

-6

-6

-3

       

Sub total - other items

-290

-305

-248

       
       

Total highways maintenance programme

18,241

18,241

18,344

       

Accounting adjustments relating to previous year

-172

-172

-176

       
       

Total highways maintenance cash limit

18,069

18,069

18,168

       
       

Appendix 6

Environment Service

Revenue Expenditure 2001/02 not included in the Cash Limit

1

Capital charges (£17.7m)

 

Capital charges are made to services for capital assets used in the provision of services. The actual charges are £1.1m less than the budget which has been reduced to reflect the final charge to the Service. This will have no direct effect upon the overall budget requirements of the County Council as the capital charges are replaced by actual financing costs in the central asset management revenue account.

2

Central support services, repairs and maintenance of buildings (£2,088,000)

 

These items are within the control of Policy and Resources. Support services are apportioned to services in accordance with the level of services provided and office accommodation occupied. Control of the budget for repairs and maintenance of buildings is by the nature of work and where it is most required rather than by service.

3

Corporate and democratic care (recharge £378,000) and unapportionable overheads (recharge £191,000)

 

These items cover management and support costs that relate to member support and advice and to pension costs for added years and early retirements. They are within this service's control and so are charged against the cash limit. But they are then recharged to Policy and Resources outside of the cash limit as the Best Value Accounting Code of Practice requires these to be excluded from the cost of services.

   

4

Flood Protection (£4,987,000)

 

Flood defence expenditure representing annual levies on the County Council by the Environment Agency.

   

Appendix 7

Environment Service

Capital Programme 2001/02

   

£'000

£'000

£'000

1

Construction of total resources

     
 

Approved programme limit - local resources

 

11,780

 

Supplementary Credit Approvals (SCA):

   
 

Original settlement for 2001/02

23,450

 
 

Starts to be supported from future SCA settlements

3,925

 
     

27,375

       
 

Original Starts Programme in Budget Book

 

39,155

       
 

Adjustments:

   
 

Flood damage SCA

5,051

 
 

Air quality monitoring SCA

29

 
 

Contaminated land SCA

1,767

 
 

Coast Protection Act SCA

216

 
 

Schemes brought forward from 2000/01

1,997

 
 

Transfer from Planning Services Revenue Budget to Environmental Improvements

99

 
 

Transfer from Highways Minor Works to Planning Services Conservation and Environmental Improvements Revenue Budget

-120

 
 

Absorption of 2000/01 Revenue Budget Overspending

-257

 
 

Transfer re Improvements Works to Jacobs Gutter Lane

-200

 
 

Subsequent adjustments to starts programme being supported from SCA settlements approved by Executive Member

119

 
       
 

Total Adjustments

 

8,701

       
 

Total Starts Programme Limit

 

47,856

       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

2

Schemes started during 2001/02

   
       
 

SCA Schemes

   
       
 

Structural Maintenance of Bridges and Roads

   
       
 

Bridges assessment and strengthening

2,080

 
 

Bridges structural maintenance

770

 
 

Principal road structural maintenance

4,960

 
 

Non principal road structural maintenance

5,160

 
 

Flood damage repairs to roads and bridges

5,051

 
 

Hythe Pier maintenance

400

18,421

       
 

Casualty Reduction Programme

   
       
 

Low cost safety schemes

910

 
 

M27 Junction 7, Hedge End

55

 
 

Lower Farnham Road, Aldershot

200

 
 

A339 Route Strategy (B3406-C70)

22

 
 

Refurbishment and betterment

120

1,307

       
 

Area Strategies

   
       
 

Andover Area (ATS)

   
 

Salisbury Road/Millway Road, Andover (net)

400

 
 

Weyhill to Portway Cycle Scheme (net)

31

 
 

Andover Station cycle facilities

15

 
 

Salisbury Road, Andover - Toucan Crossing

40

 
 

Tollgate Road, Andover - Refuge

10

 
 

King Arthur's Way, Andover - Street lighting

80

576

       
 

Basingstoke (BEST)

   
 

A30 Strategy, Ringway to Winton Square - Part 2

500

 
 

A30 Speed Regime, Basingstoke

10

 
 

BEST Intelligent Transport Systems

125

 
 

Buckskin Lane, Basingstoke - Pelican Crossing

60

 
 

BEST Rural Schemes

50

 
 

Harrow Way, Basingstoke - Toucan Crossing

130

 
 

BEST Safer Routes to School

20

895

       
       
       
       
       
       
       
 

Central Hampshire (CHARTS)

   
 

Petersfield town centre - Stage 2

200

 
 

A325 Whitehill traffic management - Stage 2

90

 
 

Petersfield railway station modal integration

34

 
 

Modal integration at other railway stations

26

 
 

Liphook traffic management (net)

20

 
 

CHARTS air quality monitoring

79

 
 

CHARTS safer routes to school

50

499

       
 

Coastal Towns (CTTS)

   
 

Lymington Quay

50

 
 

Milford Village Centre

10

 
 

Avenue Road/Southampton Road, Lymington

110

 
 

New Milton railway station facilities

20

190

       
 

North East Hampshire (NEHTS)

   
 

Modal integration at railway stations

70

 
 

Minley Road, Farnborough - cycles and pedestrians (net)

30

 
 

Farnborough Gate cycle scheme - stage 2

32

 
 

NEHTS Health and Environment

50

 
 

NEHTS decriminalised parking

200

 
 

Trunk Road, Farnborough - safer routes to school

105

 
 

NEHTS safer routes to school

50

537

       
 

New Forest (NFTS)

   
 

Brockenhurst traffic management school safety zone

70

 
 

Northfield Road, Ringwood - safe routes to school stage 2

15

 
 

Station Road/Westbeams Road, Sway

35

 
 

Sway and Hinton Admiral railway stations facilities

15

135

       
 

South West Hampshire (SWHTS)

   
 

Eastleigh Bus Station - stage 2

180

 
 

Eastleigh Bus Quality Partnership

100

 
 

A35 Salisbury Road, Totton - cycleway

35

 
 

Botley Road, Fair Oak - Pelican Crossing

35

 
 

Romsey safer routes to school

30

 
 

Doncaster Drove, Eastleigh (net)

41

421

       
       
       
       
       
       
 

South East Hampshire (SEHTS)

   
 

A3 Corridor Bus Priority, Widley to Purbrook - part 2

3,650

 
 

Gosport Ferry Interchange

20

 
 

Fareham Bus Station facilities

70

 
 

Gosport Bus Station facilities

60

 
 

Fareham/Gosport Bus Stops

50

 
 

Gosport Bus Station CCTV

30

 
 

Kiln Road/North Hill/Old Turnpike Road, Fareham (net)

40

 
 

Shopmobility, Fareham

35

 
 

Whitworth Road/Spring Gardens/South Street, Gosport

55

 
 

Leesland cycle track

20

 
 

Lee-On-Solent High Street - CCTV

40

 
 

Stokes Bay, Gosport - refuge

15

 
 

Howe Road, Gosport

22

 
 

Hayling Billy cycle route, Havant - road crossing

60

 
 

Crookhorn Lane, Purbrook cycle track (net)

25

 
 

Leigh Park to Portsmouth Bus Corridor

155

 
 

Lee to Browndown cycle scheme

240

 
 

Emsworth railway station facilities

15

 
 

SEHTS safer routes to school

150

4,752

       
 

Western Hampshire (WHTS)

   
 

Andover to Salisbury bus quality partnership

20

 
 

Kings Somborne village

35

55

       
 

Winchester (WMAP)

   
 

Bar End Park and Ride extension (net)

650

 
 

WMAP car parking improvements

50

 
 

WMAP intelligent transport systems

50

 
 

WMAP pedestrian and cycle schemes

130

 
 

WMAP air quality monitoring

20

 
 

WMAP safer routes to school

50

950

       
 

Other Priority Schemes

   
 

A30 Dorchester Arms Junction improvement (net)

265

265

       
 

Minor Works

   
 

Lymington Road, Milford-On-Sea, pelican crossing

30

 
 

Havant Road, Hayling Island - pelican crossing

30

 
 

Griffin Road, Hook - pelican crossing

35

 
 

London Road, Hook - pelican crossing

30

 
 

Ashley Road, New Milton - pelican crossing

30

 
       
       
       
 

Southampton Road, Hythe - toucan crossing

77

 
 

Wellington Avenue, Aldershot - pelican crossing (net)

23

 
 

Community Safety Initiative

60

 
 

Rural Partnership Schemes

140

 
 

Minor improvements

280

 
 

Community transport schemes

250

 
 

Public transport information

125

 
 

Remote monitoring equipment

200

 
 

Intelligent transport systems

275

1,585

       
 

Other

   
 

Buriton landfill site

20

 
 

Westwood landfill site

27

 
 

Efford landfill site

1,800

 
 

Coast Protection Act

216

2,063

 
         
 

Total SCA Schemes

   

32,651

         
 

Locally Funded Schemes

     
         
 

Structural maintenance of non principal roads

10,029

   
 

Environmental improvements

253

   
 

Regeneration of older urban areas

812

   
 

Landfill remedial works

57

11,151

 
         
 

Total Locally Funded Schemes

   

11,151

         
 

Total of Schemes Started During the Year

   

43,802

         
         
         
         
         
       

3

Schemes Carried Forward

 
     

Scheme Title

£'000

Reason for Delay

     

B3058 Bashley Crossroads, New Milton

240

To enable scheme to be constructed outside holiday season

North West Quadrant, Basingstoke

250

Further public consultation necessary

High Street and The Square, Petersfield

365

Late addition to the programme

Otterbourne traffic calming stage 2

575

Modification to design required following public consultation

A325/A30 Blackwater Valley Route 1 Bus priority corridor

850

Additional funding required

Lynchford Road, Farnborough - toucan crossing

50

Late addition to the programme

A27 Portchester Road, Fareham

510

Modification to design required following public consultation

Fareham railway station

25

Scheme deferred to coincide with South West Train's programme

Titchfield Road, Stubbington

35

Major objections to scheme

Christchurch Road, New Milton

30

Scheme design being reviewed

Traffic Enforcement technology

30

Amount held in reserve - scheme expected to be self funding

B3006 Route Strategy, Empshott

23

Scheme being developed in conjunction with Transport Research Laboratory

Fawley/Calshot Cycle Scheme

80

Land required from developer

Hythe to Dibden Cycle Scheme

85

Design delayed by the need for public consultation

Eastleigh safer routes to schools

165

Consultations with schools

Romsey safer routes to schools

170

Consultations with schools

Test Valley School, Stockbridge - stage 2

20

Traffic Regulation Order required

Stockbridge village centre

25

Late addition to the programme

Cycle parking - Hart and Rushmoor

20

Late addition to the programme

Structural maintenance of roads

174

Uncommitted balance to be carried forward

Regeneration of older urban areas

332

Uncommitted balance to be carried forward

 

4,054

 
     

Externally Funded Schemes Started in 2001/02

£'000

Andover Area (ATS)

Salisbury Road/Millway Road, Andover (contribution)

165

Weyhill to Portway Cycle Scheme (contribution)

63

Basingstoke (BEST)

Bramley traffic calming

120

Old Basing traffic calming

125

Brimpton Road, Baughurst

36

A33 Chineham Footway and Cycleway

10

Central Hampshire (CHARTS)

Liphook traffic management (contribution)

28

Fletchers Field, Liphook - cycleway links

23

North East Hampshire (NEHTS)

Minley Road, Farnborough - cycles and pedestrians (contribution)

27

Boxalls Lane, Aldershot - traffic calming

100

A325 Rectory Road, Farnborough - traffic management stage 2

80

Garrison Church, Aldershot - toucan crossing

55

Wellington Avenue, Aldershot - cycle route

30

A30 Blackwater Stage 3b - Kings Parade

250

Elvetham Road, Fleet - traffic calming

150

School Lane, Yateley - pedestrian facilities

25

New Forest (NFHT)

Brockenhurst station interchange

140

Woodstock Lane, Ringwood (contribution)

18

South West Hampshire Area (SWHTS)

Fair Oak Road, Fair Oak - toucan crossing

46

Sylvan Drive, North Baddesley

80

Doncaster Drove, Eastleigh (contribution)

149

South East Hampshire (SEHTS)

Kiln Road/North Hill/Old Turnpike Road, Fareham (contribution)

70

Crookhorn Lane, Purbrook Cycle Track (contribution)

18

A3051 Burridge to Curbridge traffic management

50

Warsash Road/Locks Road, Warsash

140

Whiteley Bus infrastructure

100

Whiteley/Segensworth signing

190

FWW Western Distributor Road - Dibles Road to Schooner Way

600

Green Pond Corner, Warblington

17

Winchester (WMAP)

Bar End park and ride extension (contributions)

2,150

£'000

Other Priority Schemes

A30 Dorchester Arms junction improvement (contribution)

50

Minor Works

Wellington Avenue, Aldershot - pelican crossing (contribution)

10

5,115

Appendix 8

Environment Service

Departmental Assurance Statement

1

Introduction

1.1

The Accounts and Audit Regulation 1996 require the County Treasurer to maintain an adequate and effective internal audit.

   

1.2

The County Treasurer employs an in-house internal audit section to provide an independent and objective appraisal function of reviewing the system of internal control. It examines, evaluates and reports to Chief Officers and the County Treasurer on the adequacy of the internal control as a contribution to the proper economic, efficient and effective use of resources.

   

1.3

From 2002/03 The Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the UK requires that the Chief Internal Auditor provides an independent opinion on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal financial control operating in the County Council. The County Treasurer has sought to develop this for 2001/02 in preparation for the full requirement next year. To enable him to do this, an independent opinion on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control has been prepared for each department.

   

2

Responsibilities

   

2.1

It is a management responsibility to develop and maintain the internal control framework, and to ensure that resources are properly applied in the manner and on the activities intended. It is the responsibility of Internal Audit to form an independent opinion, based on reviews during the year, on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control.

   

3

Basis of opinion

   

3.1

The strategic and annual internal audit plans were prepared by the Chief Internal Auditor to take account of the characteristics and relative risks of the activities involved and were approved by the County Treasurer.

   

3.2

The internal audit plan has been delivered in accordance with the Auditing Practices Board's Guideline number 308, `Guidance for Internal Auditors'.

   

3.3

Work has been planned and performed so as to obtain all the information and explanations which were considered necessary in order to provide sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the internal control system is operating effectively. However, this assurance can never be absolute. The most that the internal audit service can do is to provide reasonable assurance that there are no major weaknesses in the system of control.

   

4

Opinion

   

4.1

In our opinion the County Surveyor's and County Planning Departments have an effective framework of control which provides reasonable assurance regarding the effective, efficient and economic achievement of the department's objectives.

   
   
 

Ejner Knudsen

Chief Internal Auditor

County Treasurer's Department

Hampshire County Council