Archived decisions
Hampshire County Council Executive Member - Environment 12 February 2003 Project Appraisal: Regeneration of Older Urban Areas - Report of the Director of Environment |
Item 5 |
Contact: Hannah Walton, ext 6824
1. Summary
1.1 The following decision is sought:
That the Project Appraisal for a first phase of improvements at Glebe Gardens, Basingstoke, at an estimated cost of £40,000, be approved, subject to the granting of Conservation Area Consent and formal confirmation of the financial contribution from Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council.
2. Reason
2.1 To carry out the first phase of a scheme of landscape improvements at Glebe Gardens, in partnership with Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, as part of an ongoing programme of improvements to this important town centre park. A first phase, carried out jointly with Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council and completed in 1999, reopened a previously culverted section of the River Loddon which flows through the park. The current scheme concentrates on entrances to the park and the bridge in the centre of the park, one of its main features.
2.2 The scheme will be phased, with initial implementation of those areas which fall within the park boundary. The budget cost of the work is £40,000, made up of £25,000 from the Capital Programme budget and £15,000 from Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council. A second phase of work, utilising the remaining £75,000 Capital Programme budget and funding of £20,570 from Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, will be brought forward next year to carry out the remaining improvements. This project is funded through the Regeneration of Older Urban Areas (ROUA) 2001/03 programme approved on 11 September 2000 and external funding received by Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council.
2.3 The County Council's ROUA programme is managed to implement landmark projects to raise the quality of life for all who live, work and visit urban areas. All projects are designed to demonstrate the benefits of making the best use of land and property; high quality design; long life solutions and materials; and appropriateness to the local sense of place.
3. Other Options Considered and Rejected
3.1 Taking no action.
4. Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Decision Maker or a Member or Officer Consulted - None.
5. Dispensation granted by the Standards Committee - Not applicable.
6. Reason(s) for the Matter being dealt with if Urgent - Not applicable.
Approved by: Date:
Councillor K B Estlin
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE MEMBER - ENVIRONMENT |
PROJECT APPRAISAL |
_____________________________________________
12 FEBRURY 2003
_____________________________________________
PROJECT: |
REGENERATION OF OLDER URBAN AREAS - GLEBE GARDENS, BASINGSTOKE - PHASE II |
____________________________________________________________________
COMMENCEMENT DATE: |
MAY 2003 |
COMPLETION DATE: |
DECEMBER 2003 |
PLANNED YEAR OF START IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL PROGRAMME: 2002/03 |
____________________________________________________________________
1. |
FINANCE (Client Department, Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services [Estates Practice] and County Treasurer |
Current |
Capital | ||||
Estimate |
Programme | ||||
(at Dec 02 |
(at Dec 02 | ||||
prices) |
prices) | ||||
Capital Expenditure |
£'000 |
£'000 | |||
Land to be purchased |
Nil |
||||
Construction |
40 |
100.00 | |||
Fees |
Nil |
||||
40 |
100.00 | ||||
Less developers/ |
15 |
+ 35.57 | |||
other contributions |
|||||
25 |
135.57 | ||||
Financial provision for total scheme |
Total Cost | ||||
1. |
From Committees own resources |
||||
(a) Capital programme (as above)* |
100.00 | ||||
(b) Other |
|||||
100.00 | |||||
2. |
From other resources |
||||
(a) Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council (subject to formal approval) |
35.57 | ||||
(b) |
|||||
(c) |
|||||
TOTAL |
135.57 | ||||
Value of land for this project in HCC ownership £ |
|||||
Variations from capital programme |
|||||
Revenue implications |
£'000 |
% variation | |||
to Committee's | |||||
budget | |||||
Net current expenditure |
Nil |
Nil | |||
Capital charges |
Nil |
Nil | |||
TOTAL net expenditure |
Nil |
Nil | |||
*Further phases of work will be brought forward for approval early in 2003 once extent of additional grant funding has been established.
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
2. |
STATEMENT OF NEED/JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECT (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
Glebe Gardens and its setting play a strategic role within the Old Town Centre Conservation Area. Three significant listed buildings - Chute House (the old rectory), St Michael's Church and Church Cottage - lie close at hand and define historic quarters of considerable merit. Glebe Gardens is one of the town's 'premier' parks. It provides an important facility for informal recreation close to the town centre and the setting to busy pedestrian routes to the town from residential areas to the west. It is a point of arrival for many visiting 'The Anvil' by car. It also serves extensive residential areas to the south and west. Environmental enhancement to the River Loddon was funded by the Regeneration of Older Urban Areas (ROUA) programme in partnership with Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council in 1999. Work is currently under way on a scheme of improvements in St Michael's churchyard which is being funded from the 1999/01 programme. The quality of the entrances to the park from Church Street, Church Square, adjacent Church Cottage and the Victory roundabout are ill-defined, unwelcoming and inappropriate for this historic park. The County Council's Urban Parks Study (1996) established the site as a park of 'Local Heritage Merit'. The Hampshire Gardens Trust has undertaken historic research and supports the project. The Borough Council is about to let Chute House to a new tenant. This is an excellent opportunity to achieve an appropriate reconstruction of the adjacent park entrance and setting to this building. The work will include meeting current standards on access. The proposals for the Gardens have been developed within the context of a master plan, showing comprehensive and long-term proposals. In addition, a suggestion from the local heritage society has been taken up to include artwork within the park commemorating the life and work of local poet Thomas Warton. |
____________________________________________________________________
3. |
IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
National/County network and policies | |
The improvements for the park meet the policy aims of the County Council's ROUA programme, Local Transport Plan (cycleways), and Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council's Park Strategy. | |
Details of scheme and design standards | |
The proposed Phase II scheme will include: (i) improving the entrance from the Victory roundabout and reducing the impact of the busy neighbouring roads; (ii) improving the Church Square entrance adjacent to the subway under Timberlake Road; and (iii) restoring and improving the modern footbridge over the Loddon in the centre of the park and the open space immediately around it. Detailed plans of the first phase works and phasing plan will be displayed at the meeting (currently being prepared). The scheme has been designed in accordance with current good practice, including: (i) BS 8300 `Design of Buildings and Their Approaches to Meet the Needs of Disabled People'; and (ii) `Access Audits' published by the Centre for Accessible Environments. Subsequent phases will be subject to separate Project Appraisals. The work will include: (i) providing an improved entrance to the park adjacent to St Michael's Church; (ii) restoring stone and iron work to the historic bridge across the River Loddon; and (iii) working with external arts organisations to commission and install artwork to commemorate local poet Thomas Warton. | |
Environmental impact | |
The scheme will make high quality improvements to this important urban park with significant benefit to the local environment. Earlier improvements to the nature conservation value of the park with the introduction of waterside planting will be developed further. The scheme will make extensive use of native plants and introduce new management regimes for grass areas. All construction materials will be selected for their quality and long life, cutting down on replacement costs. | |
Land requirements | |
No land acquisition required. All works to be within area of land owned by Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council. | |
Statutory procedures | |
Conservation Area Consent will be required. | |
Public Consultation | |
The overall master plan and strategy for the park is the result of extensive public consultation undertaken by Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council. Local residents, the Basingstoke Heritage Society, Hampshire Gardens Trust and the Town Centre Manager will be consulted on detailed aspects as appropriate. It is also hoped to involve local children in the scheme. | |
Local Member's view | |
Councillor Gurden has given his full support to the scheme. | |
Facilities for the disabled | |
Care is being given to make small changes as part of the work to improve disabled access. New paving and the design and position of furniture and signage will make access to the gardens and the facilities easier for all. | |
Maintenance implications | |
The gardens are owned and maintained by Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council. After an initial establishment period of three years for the landscape works, responsibility for implementation of an agreed management plan will revert to the Borough Council. | |
Crime and Disorder Act 1998 | |
Improvements at the entrances, together with some clearance of overgrown vegetation within the park, will open up the park to view and improve perceived safety. Better signage and more generous entrances will create well-defined routes through the park. Use of existing unofficial shortcuts will be discouraged. | |
Sustainability | |
The scheme will improve the appearance and safety of pedestrian areas and will help to encourage walking and cycling. It will improve the setting of the three important listed buildings and encourage local interest in the historic fabric of the town centre. The artwork and information on Thomas Warton will add interest and value to the park for visitors and, in particular, be designed as a learning resource for local educational establishments. The overall design of the improvements will seek to provide better scope for use for community events and activities. |
____________________________________________________________________
4. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED (Client Department) |
_________________________________________________________________
Other areas of work within the park were considered but were not thought to address the priority issue of the entrances or the protection of existing assets. Alternative designs and finishes for paving and site furniture were also considered, however, these were not thought to provide the required level of local distinctiveness or robustness. |
____________________________________________________________________
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers | |
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. | |
NB the list excludes: | |
1. |
Published works. |
2. |
Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act. |
TITLE |
LOCATION |
None |
7650/HW