Archived decisions
Hampshire County Council Executive Member - Environment 11 March 2003 Project Appraisal : Lockswood Road, Locks Heath - Report of the Director of Environment |
Item 6 |
Contact: Mandy Ware, tel: 01962 857822
1. Summary
1.1 The following decision is sought:
That the Project Appraisal for the installation of a Toucan crossing on Lockswood Road, Locks Heath be approved.
2. Reason
2.1 The installation of a Toucan crossing will assist pedestrians, particularly schoolchildren, to cross the busy Lockswood Road and will provide a new link for cyclists between Heath Road North and Heath Road South as part of the local cycle network.
3. Other Options Considered and Rejected
3.1 Alternative types of crossing are not appropriate on the grounds that both pedestrians and cyclists need to be catered for.
4. Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Decision Maker or a Member or Officer Consulted - None.
5. Dispensation granted by the Standards Committee - Not applicable.
6. Reason(s) for the Matter being dealt with if Urgent - Not applicable.
Approved by: Date:
Councillor K B Estlin
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE MEMBER - ENVIRONMENT |
PROJECT APPRAISAL |
_____________________________________________
11 MARCH 2003
_____________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
PROJECT: |
LOCKSWOOD ROAD, LOCKS HEATH - TOUCAN CROSSING |
____________________________________________________________________
COMMENCEMENT DATE: |
MAY 2003 |
COMPLETION DATE: |
JUNE 2003 |
PLANNED YEAR OF START IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL PROGRAMME: 2003/04 |
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
1. |
FINANCE (Client Department, Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services [Estates Practice] and County Treasurer) |
____________________________________________________________________
Current |
Capital | |||||
Estimate |
Programme | |||||
(at Jan 2003 |
(at Jan 2003 | |||||
prices) |
prices) | |||||
Capital Expenditure |
£'000 |
£'000 | ||||
Land to be purchased |
Nil |
Nil | ||||
Construction |
42 |
42 | ||||
Fees |
13 |
13 | ||||
55 |
55 | |||||
Less developers/ |
||||||
other contributions |
||||||
55 |
55 | |||||
Financial provision for total scheme |
Total Cost | |||||
1. |
From Committees own resources |
|||||
(a) Capital programme (as above) |
55 | |||||
(b) Other |
||||||
55 | ||||||
2. |
From other resources |
|||||
(a) |
||||||
(b) |
||||||
(c) |
||||||
TOTAL |
55 | |||||
Value of land for this project in HCC ownership £ |
||||||
Variations from capital programme |
||||||
Revenue implications |
£'000 |
% variation | ||||
to Committee's | ||||||
budget | ||||||
Net current expenditure |
1.2 |
0.003 | ||||
Capital charges |
5.0 |
0.005 | ||||
TOTAL net expenditure |
6.2 |
0.008 | ||||
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
2. |
STATEMENT OF NEED/JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECT (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
The Fareham cycle network includes an extensive network of pedestrian and cycle routes in the Locks Heath/Warsash area. Heath Road North and Heath Road South form part of this network but are currently separated by road closures either side of Lockswood Road (see attached location plan). To connect these two side roads and provide a route for cyclists and pedestrians to Brookfield School and the Locks Heath Centre from the surrounding areas a safe and convenient crossing is required. Brookfield School is being encouraged to develop a School Travel Plan to ensure children gain the maximum benefit from these facilities. In view of the site's particular circumstances, a signal controlled Toucan crossing is the most appropriate type of crossing for this location and was a recommendation of the Locks Heath/Warsash Transportation Study in 1998. A Toucan crossing was included in the list of schemes for the Pedestrian Crossings Programme 2002/03, approved by the Executive Member for Environment on 14 May 2002. |
___________________________________________________________________
3. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
National/County Network and Policies | |
The proposal is consistent with the County Council's local transport strategy and policies, to reduce accident potential and provide improved facilities for pedestrians and safer routes to schools. | |
Details of Scheme and Design Standards | |
The crossing design complies with the Department for Transport and Hampshire County Council standards, and has been safety audited at the appropriate stages in the design process. The provision of a crossing at this location is justified in accordance with the normal criteria. | |
Environmental Impact | |
The proposal encourages the sustainable and non-polluting transport options of walking and cycling. | |
Land Requirements | |
No land acquisition required. All works to be confined within existing public highway limits. | |
Statutory Procedures | |
All necessary statutory requirements have been satisfied in the development of this proposal. | |
Public Consultation | |
Public notices have been posted on site for 28 days providing details of the proposal. As a result no comments were received. | |
Local Member's View | |
The local Member, Councillor Estlin, supports the proposal. | |
Facilities for the Disabled | |
The proposal incorporates tactile paving and audible warnings for the visually impaired, with flush kerbs at the crossing point for wheelchairs, prams and less mobile people. | |
Maintenance Implications | |
The revenue implications of this proposal will be taken into account in the setting of the annual base budget. | |
Crime and Disorder Act 1998 | |
The provisions of this Act have no impact on this proposal. | |
Sustainability | |
The Toucan crossing supports walking and cycling, both of which are sustainable forms of transport. |
___________________________________________________________________
4. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
Alternative types of crossing are not appropriate on the grounds that both pedestrians and cyclists need to be catered for. |
____________________________________________________________________
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers | |
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. | |
NB the list excludes: | |
1. |
Published works. |
2. |
Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act. |
TITLE |
LOCATION |
Project file |
Environment Department, Traffic Management Group and Intelligent Transport Systems, Monument House |
7781/MCW