Archived decisions
Hampshire County Council | |||
Executive Member - Environment |
Item 3 | ||
24 June 2003 |
|||
Environment Policy Review Committee |
Item 12 | ||
21 July 2003 |
|||
Final Accounts 2002/03 | |||
Report of the County Treasurer and Director of Environment | |||
Contact: Ejner Knudsen, ext 7403
1 Introduction
1.1 This report summarises the Environment service's spending in 2002/03.
1.2 It recommends that the final accounts for 2002/03 be approved and that the overspending on the service's cash limited revenue expenditure be reported to the Cabinet for their consideration.
1.3 Overall there is a net overspending of £256,000 (0.3%) against the 2002/03 revenue cash limit of £77.9m.
1.4 The major variations are:
£'000 |
£'000 | ||
Waste management contract related services: |
|||
- |
storage and disposal of refrigeration equipment |
+327 | |
- |
other waste contract related services |
-12 | |
+315 | |||
Highways maintenance |
+80 |
||
Highways management and support services |
-104 |
||
Other variations |
-35 |
-59 | |
+256 | |||
1.5 The County Council's policy is that 100% of overspendings should be carried forward into the following year's budget. However, the service's overspending is mainly due to excess expenditure on the waste contract related services, reflecting the extent to which the shortfall in Government support for the storage and disposal of refrigeration equipment could not be fully accommodated from savings elsewhere within the approved budget for the waste contract related services.
1.6 The likelihood of additional expenditure in connection with the storage and disposal of fridges, beyond the level of Government support, had been identified in budget monitoring reports during the year, with the expectation that the Cabinet would consider the implications of any funding shortfall against the additional balances set aside in the 2002/03 budget for this and other pressures. In view of this, it is recommended that the Cabinet consider whether they wish to meet, from central balances, the service's overspending of £256,000 against its 2002/03 cash limit.
1.7 In considering the final outturn position compared with the service's cash limit, variations in expenditure on highways winter maintenance (salting and snow clearance) are excluded. This is because special budgetary arrangements apply whereby any underspendings or overspendings against the winter maintenance budget provision, which is set at a level equivalent to average expenditure during the past four years, are reflected against the County Council's central balances.
1.8 During 2002/03, winter maintenance expenditure totalled £2,024,000, which was £308,000 above the revised budget provision. This higher outturn figure includes expenditure incurred in dealing with two periods of snowfall (on
8 January 2003 and 30 January 2003), together with extensive salting operations during the cold, dry weather conditions experienced during the first two weeks and at the end of January 2003. Altogether, salting operations were carried out on approximately 60 days during the winter period, which was slightly above the average number included in the budget, based on the average during the previous four winters.
1.9 On capital, schemes to the value of £45.3m started in the year and schemes to the value of £2.4m have been approved by the Cabinet to be carried forward to start in 2003/04.
1.10 In total, this exactly matches the overall 2002/03 level of capital programme resources of £47.7m. Additionally, schemes to the value of £5.2m, which are externally funded from developers and other contributions, were also started during the year.
1.11 Further details on the main differences between the actual revenue expenditure and the revised budget for cash limited expenditure are given in Part A below, whilst details of revenue expenditure which is not included in the cash limit are contained in the appendices at the end of the report. Part B deals with capital schemes. Part C explains the basis of the financial control assurance statement included as Appendix 8. Part D deals with the service's Partnership Accounts.
1 Part A - Revenue expenditure under the service's control
1.1 Revenue expenditure under the service's direct control is subject to a cash limit. For 2002/03 the adjusted amount was £77.9m as set out in Appendix 1.
1.2 The final outturn was £256,000 more than the cash limit. The overall position is analysed in Appendices 2 and 3. Appendix 4 includes a more detailed statement of variations from the revised budget.
1.3 The overspending in 2002/03 compares with the outturns achieved in recent years for the Environment services (formerly under the control of the Planning and Transportation Committee and Policy and Resources Committee prior to 2001/02) as set out in the following table:
Variations from revised budget | ||
£'000 |
% | |
1999/00 |
-76 |
-0.1 |
2000/01 |
251 |
0.3 |
2001/02 |
-35 |
- |
2002/03 |
256 |
0.3 |
The more significant elements within the total net overspending are explained in the following paragraphs.
Highways and transportation services
1.4 Cash limited revenue expenditure during 2002/03 on the highways and transportation services amounted to £39,649,000, an underspending of £27,000 (-0.1%).
Highways maintenance
1.5 Expenditure on highways maintenance (excluding winter maintenance salting and snow clearance - see paragraphs 1.7 and 1.8 above) totalled £17,247,000, being excess expenditure of £80,000 (+0.5%) compared to the revised budget for this division of service. This represents a very close outturn during the transitional year in which the arrangements for network management in the former district council highways agencies and in other devolved highways units across the county were subject to reorganisation, with the phased implementation of the best value review blueprint for the future.
1.6 Final figures for the year show that expenditure exceeded the budget allocations on a number of operational headings including emergency measures to deal with flooding during the autumn, street lighting maintenance and column replacements, and other routine works. Further analysis of the outturn on highways maintenance, in comparison to the final approved works programme, is shown in Appendix 5.
Highways management and support services
1.7 As reported previously in the budget monitoring reports during the year, the highways management and support services budget has been under pressure from the absorption of additional expenditure on staff retention and recruitment, the establishment of the new Environment department, the provision of additional office accommodation in Winchester and the implementation of the network management blueprint review.
1.8 The most recent budget monitoring report made reference to further savings of £38,000 that would still need to be found during the latter stages of the financial year, to avoid an overspending on this division of service. However, in the event, higher savings from continuing staff vacancies, together with additional income, contributed to an underspending of £104,000 (-0.7%).
School crossing patrols
1.9 Substantial progress has been made in implementing the approved improvement plan for the school crossing patrol service throughout the first year following the transfer of this service from the Education department, during which a small overspending of £2,000 (+0.2%) was recorded.
1.10 New systems of site and staff risk assessment have been developed during the year, with urgent findings such as the need for improved uniforms, equipment and training being delivered. The service has also reviewed vacancy management and has initiated new arrangements for advertising and recruiting staff to vacant priority sites. Additionally, a programme of infrastructure maintenance and improvements has commenced across the county, with priority for these works being directed towards the busiest and most needy locations.
Public transport
1.11 The 2002/03 revised budget for public transport support and co-ordination was set at £5,095,000, including an additional sum of £300,000 allocated by the Cabinet in February, to cover the cost of maintaining subsidised bus services. The final outturn figure for this division of service was £5,091,000, an underspending of £4,000.
1.12 During 2002/03, the Government made available Rural Bus Subsidy Grant of £1,307,000 in support of the provision of rural bus services, which was fully consumed in supporting these services during the year.
Planning services
1.13 Expenditure on the planning services during 2002/03 totalled £4,540,000 which was exactly equal to the overall cash limit for this service. However, there were a number of variations to planned expenditure within this overall outturn and the apportionment of net expenditure across the service's functional headings shows higher expenditure on environmental initiatives being mainly offset by savings on planning policy. Further details are shown in Appendices 3 and 4.
Waste management
Waste contract related services
1.14 The final 2002/03 cash limit for the waste management contract related services was £31,421,000, including the full allocation of the central waste management contingency of £2,985,000. Overall contract related expenditure totalled £31,736,000, representing an excess of £315,000 (+1.0%). This outturn included expenditure of £1,290,000 on the storage and disposal of refrigeration equipment which was £327,000 more than the financial support made available by the Government for this function during the year.
1.15 Other than fridges, the outturn for the other waste contract related services, including the main long-term waste disposal contract, recycling credit payments and trade waste income, was £12,000 below the adjusted budget provision. Within this total, household waste volumes were marginally lower than the corresponding levels in the previous year. However, these savings were partially offset by the net loss of trade waste income, following the commercialisation of trade waste rounds by several district councils and higher recycling credits payments. It has also been necessary to include in the final accounts prudent provision for a number of unresolved contractual claims, thus reducing the extent to which savings from lower household waste volumes were available to meet the excess cost of storage and disposal of fridges.
Other waste management budgets
1.16 Expenditure on the other waste management budgets was £22,000 (-1.0%) lower than the revised budget cash limit of £2,226,000, which included the additional allocation of £90,000 approved by the Cabinet in February to cover the anticipated higher cost of disposal of abandoned vehicles.
1.17 In the event, final expenditure on the disposal of abandoned vehicles was £29,000 below the adjusted revised budget, reflecting lower than anticipated final claims from the district councils. Other variations included savings of £24,000 on administration, offset by additional expenditure of £31,000 on the maintenance of landfill sites and household waste recycling facilities.
Carry forward to 2003/04 of overspending
1.18 As mentioned in paragraph 1.5, it is the County Council's policy that 100% of service's overspendings should be carried forward and accommodated within the following year's budget. As previously stated, the Environment service's outturn in 2002/03 on the overall cash limited budget shows an overspending of £256,000. However, this overall outturn figure includes, as an exceptional item, the overspending of £315,000 on the waste contract related budgets, which mainly reflects the extent to which resources made available by the Government for the storage and disposal of refrigeration equipment were insufficient to cover the full cost of providing this service during the year. It has not been possible to fully absorb this excess expenditure on fridges from within the total waste contract related budget, because savings from lower household waste volumes have been largely offset by lower trade waste income, higher recycling credits payments and additional provision for contractual claims.
1.19 Excluding the waste contract related budgets, the outturn on the remaining part of the Environment service's cash limited revised budget shows an underspending of £59,000. However this underspending needs to be considered in the context of the additional sum of £390,000 which was allocated by the Cabinet in February to cover the anticipated higher expenditure on bus subsidies and the disposal of abandoned vehicles, this increase being subject to future adjustment when the final accounts are reported to Cabinet.
1.20 As mentioned in the introduction to this report, the likelihood of additional expenditure in connection with the storage and disposal of fridges, beyond the level of Government support, had been previously identified in budget monitoring reports during the year. The expectation has been that the Cabinet would consider the implications of any funding shortfall later in the year, against the additional balances set aside in the 2002/03 budget for this and other pressures. It is therefore recommended that the final accounts position showing an overspending of £256,000 on the overall cash limited budgets, be brought to the attention of the Cabinet so that they may determine whether or not to meet this sum from central resources. This would take into the account the excess expenditure on the waste management contract related budgets, and would also reflect the savings of £59,000 on other cash limited budgets within the context of the additional sum of £390,000, for bus subsidies and for the disposal of abandoned vehicles, provided by the Cabinet in February.
2 Part B - Capital expenditure 2002/03
2.1 The outturn for 2002/03 is set out below with details of the total resources and individual schemes started in the year appearing in Appendix 7.
Locally resourced programme |
Supported by Government approvals |
Total | |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | |
Total resources |
13,583 |
34,131 |
47,714 |
Value of schemes started in 2002/03 |
13,583 |
31,756 |
45,339 |
Value of schemes carried forward to 2003/04 |
- |
2,375 |
2,375 |
Over/under commitment against the cash limit |
- |
- |
- |
2.2 The total starts limit for 2002/03 amounted to £47.7m and schemes to the value of £45.3m were started in the year.
2.3 Schemes with a total value of £2.4m, originally programmed to start in 2002/03, have been approved by the Cabinet to be carried forward to start in 2003/04. These and the reasons for their delay are set out in Appendix 7.
2.4 The combined value of those schemes started and those approved to be carried forward to start in 2003/04 is £47.7m, which is equal to the programme cash limit. In addition, schemes to the value of £5.2m, to be externally funded, were started during the year.
2.5 Total capital payments during 2002/03 amounted to £53.1m, of which £4.2m is to be funded from external resources, including contributions from developers, district and parish councils, and Government and European grants. Payments on those capital programme schemes being funded from local County Council resources totalled £14.0m.
2.6 The balance of the expenditure, £34.9m, is to be funded from basic credit approval (BCA) and supplementary credit approvals (SCA) provided by the Government.
3 Part C - Departmental assurance statement
3.1 A statement of internal financial control will be included in the 2002/03 statement of accounts. As part of the process of enabling the County Treasurer to form a view on the effectiveness of internal financial control, the Chief Internal Auditor has produced an independent assurance statement on the adequacy of the system of internal control in each department. Appendix 8 contains the statement relating to the Environment service and concludes that the Environment department has an effective framework of control which provides reasonable assurance regarding the effective, efficient and economic achievement of the department's objectives. The overall opinion on the County Council's internal financial control arrangements will be reported to the Standards Committee.
4 Part D - Partnership Accounts
4.1 Details are given in Appendix 9 for the Safety Camera and Life 3 partnerships in 2002/03. These are partnerships for which the County Council is the accountable body, but where no report is made to another committee or partnership board including members of the County Council and where the full expenditure and income is not included in the service's accounts.
Recommendation
1 That the report be noted.
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.
NB the list excludes:
1. Published works.
2. Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.
TITLE FILE
Summary of Accounts
Summaries of actual spending 2002/03 | |
Appendix |
Contents |
1 |
Construction of the cash limit |
2 |
Summary of revenue expenditure |
3 |
Analysis of cash limited revenue expenditure over services |
4 |
Major variations in cash limited expenditure |
5 |
Summary showing detailed outturn on highways maintenance revenue budget |
6 |
Revenue expenditure 2002/03 not included in the cash limit |
7 |
Capital expenditure 2002/03 |
8 |
Departmental assurance statement |
9 |
Partnership accounts |
Appendix 1
Environment
Revenue Expenditure 2002/03
Construction of Cash Limit
1 |
Revenue expenditure under the service's direct control was subject to a cash limit set by the Cabinet of £75,482,000 (excluding highways winter maintenance), reflecting the recommended revised budget presented as part of the 2003/04 revenue budget report to the Executive Member on 24 January 2003. | ||
2 |
The report drew attention to the likelihood of additional expenditure, beyond the budget provision, of £300,000 on public transport bus subsidies and £90,000 on the waste management budget for the disposal of abandoned vehicles. In addition, it was assessed that the likely level of expenditure on the storage and disposal of refrigeration equipment might be £400,000 in excess of the available funding. | ||
3 |
The above position was brought to the attention of the Cabinet at their meeting on 10 February 2003 and it was decided, subject to the overall final outturn on the Environment budget, to allocate an additional sum of £390,000 to the cash limit to cover the anticipated higher expenditure on bus subsidies and abandoned vehicles, although this amount would be adjusted when the final accounts are reported to the Cabinet. | ||
4 |
With regard to the additional costs of storage and disposal of refrigeration equipment, the Cabinet agreed that these be offset by any savings against the central waste management contingency allocation of £2,985,000, as a result of lower waste volumes. The 2002/03 waste contingency has now been fully allocated to the Environment services, resulting in a further increase of £2,069,000 to the cash limit. | ||
5 |
When the revised budget was set in January a sum of £77,000 was included towards the management of natural resources, reflecting the allocation of pump priming grant under the Government's Public Service Agreement (PSA) initiative. It has now become clear that when the special grant report was laid before Parliament, one of the conditions was that the allowance was to be paid to local authorities as capital grant. However, as the types of expenditure to be covered by this grant are not restricted to the types of expenditure that can normally be charged to the capital accounts, the County Council has been issued with a capitalisation direction to cover any revenue expenditure to be financed by the grant. In view of this, the revenue budget cash limit has been reduced by £77,000 to reflect the planned recharge of expenditure in connection with this PSA to capital. | ||
6 |
A further minor cash limit increase of £22,000 has been made in respect of higher business rates on the County Council's own properties, as this sum could not be estimated precisely when the revenue budget was set. | ||
7 |
No adjustments are required this year in respect of Rural Bus Subsidy Grant as the 2002/03 grant allocation of £1,307,000 has been fully utilised during the accounting period. | ||
8 |
The net effect of the above changes, which have been incorporated into the adjusted revised budget as shown in column 1 of Appendix 3, are summarised below. | ||
£'000 |
|||
Cash limit approved in the revised budget |
75,482 |
||
Additional sum for public transport bus subsidies |
300 |
||
Additional sum for abandoned vehicles disposal |
90 |
||
Capitalisation of PSA for natural resources management |
-77 |
||
Waste Management Contingency Q3 |
555 |
||
Waste Management Contingency Q4 |
1,514 |
||
Business Rates - higher actual costs |
22 |
||
Adjusted cash limit (excluding winter maintenance) |
77,886 |
||
Net Expenditure |
78,142 |
||
Net overspending against service's cash limited expenditure |
256 |
||
Appendix 2
Environment
Final Accounts 2002/03
Summary of Revenue Expenditure
(1) |
(2) |
(3) | ||
Adjusted Revised Estimate |
Actual 2002/03 |
Variation (Col 2-Col 1) | ||
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | ||
Cash limited expenditure |
77,886 |
78,142 |
256 | |
Other expenditure which is the responsibility of the service: |
||||
- Winter maintenance |
1,716 |
2,024 |
308 | |
Sub total |
79,602 |
80,166 |
564 | |
Trading units (income)/expenditure transferred (to)/from reserves - River Hamble |
-112 |
-137 |
-25 | |
Capital charges |
19,428 |
19,428 |
- | |
Other expenditure which is controlled centrally by Policy and Resources |
||||
- |
Repairs and maintenance of buildings |
5 |
11 |
6 |
- |
Central support services |
2,118 |
2,088 |
-30 |
Less: |
||||
Expenditure controlled by this service recharged to Policy and Resources: |
||||
- |
Corporate and democratic core |
-398 |
-398 |
- |
- |
Unapportionable overheads |
-391 |
-325 |
66 |
Flood Protection |
5,429 |
5,429 |
- | |
Government grants: |
||||
- |
Rural bus subsidy grant |
-1,307 |
-1,307 |
- |
- |
Disposal of refrigeration equipment |
-843 |
-843 |
- |
Total Net Expenditure |
103,531 |
104,112 |
581 | |
Reconciliation with total net expenditure in the budget book: |
||||
Net expenditure, per page B21 of the budget book |
102,760 |
|||
Adjustments |
||||
Variation in capital charges |
-1,320 |
|||
Waste management contract related services |
2,069 |
|||
Business rates variation |
22 |
|||
Total |
103,531 |
|||
Appendix 3
Environment
Revenue Expenditure 2002/03
Analysis of Cash Limited Expenditure over Services
(1) |
(2) |
(3) | |
Division of Service |
Adjusted Revised Estimate |
Actual 2002/03 |
Variation (Col 2 - Col 1) |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | |
Highways and Transportation |
|||
Highways Maintenance (excluding winter maintenance) |
17,167 |
17,247 |
80 |
Road safety education |
218 |
217 |
-1 |
School crossing patrols |
945 |
947 |
2 |
Traffic surveys |
239 |
239 |
- |
Parking services |
-94 |
-94 |
- |
Public transport |
5,095 |
5,091 |
-4 |
Rural bus subsidy grant |
1,307 |
1,307 |
- |
Management and support services |
14,799 |
14,695 |
-104 |
39,676 |
39,649 |
-27 | |
Planning Services |
|||
Development control |
1,020 |
1,015 |
-5 |
Planning policy |
2,185 |
2,065 |
-120 |
Environment initiatives |
967 |
1,093 |
126 |
Economic development |
115 |
110 |
-5 |
Community development and other projects |
253 |
257 |
4 |
4,540 |
4,540 |
- | |
Waste Management |
|||
Waste contract related services |
31,421 |
31,736 |
315 |
Other waste management services |
2,226 |
2,204 |
-22 |
33,647 |
33,940 |
293 | |
Other Services |
|||
Reservoirs Act 1975 |
23 |
13 |
-10 |
Total net expenditure (excluding highways winter maintenance) |
77,886 |
78,142 |
256 |
Highways winter maintenance |
1,716 |
2,024 |
308 |
Total |
79,602 |
80,166 |
564 |
Appendix 4
Environment
Revenue Expenditure 2002/03
Major variations in cash limited expenditure - overspending of £256,000
Budget Heading |
Variation |
Adjusted Revised Budget |
Reason |
£'000 |
£'000 |
||
Highways and Transportation |
|||
Highways maintenance - county roads and bridges |
80 |
17,167 |
Additional expenditure on emergency works following flooding (+£30,000), street lighting maintenance and column replacements (+£40,000), and other routine maintenance works (+£10,000). |
School crossing patrols |
2 |
945 |
Additional expenditure on infrastructure maintenance and site improvements. |
Public transport |
-4 |
5,095 |
Lower expenditure on public transport bus subsidies. |
Management and support services |
-104 |
14,799 |
Underspending on staff salaries |
Planning Services |
- |
4,540 |
Higher expenditure on environmental initiatives (+£126,000) and community development and other projects (+£4,000), offset by savings on planning policy (-£120,000), development control (-£5,000) and economic development |
Waste management |
|||
Contract related services |
315 |
31,421 |
Excess expenditure on storage and disposal of refrigeration equipment (+£327,000), partially offset by savings on other contract related services |
Other waste management services |
-22 |
2,226 |
Lower expenditure on disposal of abandoned vehicles (-£29,000), savings in administration |
Other services |
|||
Reservoirs Act 1975 |
-10 |
23 |
Lower expenditure in connection with the inspection of reservoirs. |
Appendix 5
Environment
Revenue Expenditure 2002/03
Summary showing detailed outturn on highways maintenance revenue budget
Operational Heading |
Final Programme |
Outturn 2002/03 |
£'000 |
£'000 | |
Ordinary maintenance |
||
Routine carriageway and footways running repairs |
3,065 |
3,016 |
Gully emptying |
889 |
875 |
A321 routine maintenance - payment to Surrey County Council |
6 |
7 |
Material storage facility at Chesil Tunnel |
3 |
3 |
Aids to movement |
1,242 |
1,222 |
Traffic management |
427 |
396 |
Traffic signal maintenance |
259 |
317 |
Intelligent transport systems |
204 |
163 |
Urban traffic control |
80 |
63 |
Traffic signals modifications |
217 |
207 |
Remote monitoring of traffic signals |
66 |
65 |
Rechargeable accident damage |
160 |
86 |
Grass cutting, trees and shrubs maintenance |
1,418 |
1,695 |
Hazard clearance (road traffic accidents) |
317 |
312 |
Weed control |
540 |
531 |
Arboricultural |
334 |
328 |
Travellers preventative measures |
8 |
3 |
District managed grass cutting |
477 |
468 |
Sub total - ordinary maintenance |
9,712 |
9,757 |
Street lighting and illuminated signs |
||
Energy - street lights |
1,454 |
1,454 |
Energy - signs |
93 |
93 |
Energy - traffic signals |
181 |
181 |
Maintenance contract - street lights |
2,707 |
2,458 |
Maintenance contract - signs |
1,000 |
419 |
Special replacement programme - works |
850 |
1,686 |
Special replacement programme - scheme design fees |
51 |
85 |
Sub total - street lighting and illuminated signs |
6,336 |
6,376 |
Bridges |
||
Routine maintenance |
56 |
54 |
Subway pumps - maintenance and energy |
42 |
38 |
Subway grafitti cleaning |
160 |
166 |
Railtrack charges |
68 |
61 |
Disused railway bridges |
12 |
4 |
Weight restriction signing |
6 |
- |
Footbridges |
59 |
50 |
Monitoring of sub-standard bridges |
11 |
4 |
Sub total - bridges |
414 |
377 |
Other items |
||
Flooding |
35 |
65 |
Technical surveys |
263 |
268 |
Depots maintenance |
154 |
164 |
Highways maintenance IT system development |
443 |
397 |
Earmarked reserves - agents irrecoverable accident damage |
100 |
100 |
Sub total - other items |
995 |
994 |
Winter maintenance |
1,716 |
2,024 |
Income |
||
Depots net rentals |
-154 |
-164 |
Rechargeable works |
-130 |
-89 |
Private street works interest from frontagers |
-6 |
-4 |
Sub total - income |
-290 |
-257 |
Total highways maintenance programme |
18,883 |
19,271 |
Appendix 6
Environment
Revenue Expenditure 2002/03 not included in the cash limit
1 |
Capital charges (£19,428,000) |
Capital charges are made to services for capital assets used in the provision of services. The budgets for capital charges have been reduced by £1,320,000 to reflect the final charges to the Environment services. This variation will have no direct effect upon the overall budget requirements of the County Council as the capital charges are replaced by actual financing costs in the central asset management revenue account. | |
2 |
Central support services, repairs and maintenance of buildings (£2,099,000)
|
These items are within the control of Policy and Resources. The buildings, Grounds and Contracts Panel control the budget for repairs and maintenance of buildings by the nature of work and where it is most required, rather than by individual service. | |
3 |
Corporate and democratic core (recharge £398,000) and unapportionable overheads (recharge £325,000) |
These items cover management and support costs that relate to member support and advice and to pension costs for added years and early retirements. They are within the Executive Member's control and so are charged against Environment service's cash limit. But they are then recharged to Policy and Resources outside of the cash limit as the Best Value Accounting Code of Practice requires these to be excluded from the cost of services. | |
4 |
Flood Protection (£5,429,000) |
Flood defence expenditure representing annual levies on the County Council by the Environment Agency. | |
Appendix 7
Environment
Capital Programme 2002/03
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 | ||
1 |
Construction of total resources |
|||
Approved programme limit - local resources |
13,077 | |||
Government Credit Approvals (SCA/BCA): |
||||
Original settlement for 2002/03 |
26,646 |
|||
Starts to be supported from future settlements |
3,292 |
|||
29,938 | ||||
Original Starts Programme in Budget Book |
43,015 | |||
Adjustments: |
||||
Contaminated land SCA |
-221 |
|||
Coast Protection Act SCA |
141 |
|||
Schemes brought forward from 2001/02 |
4,054 |
|||
Subsequent adjustments to starts programme being supported from SCA settlements approved by Executive Member: |
||||
May 2002 |
4,030 |
|||
September 2002 |
2,750 |
|||
January 2003 |
-9,547 |
|||
Subsequent cost variations and programme amendments since January 2003 |
3,492 |
|||
Total Adjustments |
4,699 | |||
Total Starts Programme Limit |
47,714 | |||
2 |
Schemes started during 2002/03 |
|||
SCA Schemes |
||||
Structural Maintenance of Bridges and Roads |
||||
Bridges assessment and strengthening |
1,442 |
|||
Bridges structural maintenance |
1,278 |
|||
Principal road structural maintenance |
5,713 |
|||
Non principal road structural maintenance |
1,017 |
|||
9,450 | ||||
Casualty Reduction Programme |
||||
Low cost safety schemes |
968 |
|||
Bashley Crossroads, New Milton |
292 |
|||
B3006 Empshott |
15 |
|||
Refurbishment of treated sites |
121 |
|||
A31 Winchester to County boundary - safety fencing |
200 |
|||
1,596 | ||||
Area Strategies |
||||
Andover Area (ATS) |
||||
No starts |
- |
|||
- | ||||
Basingstoke (BEST) |
||||
BEST Decriminalised parking |
75 |
|||
BEST Safer Routes to School |
20 |
|||
95 | ||||
Central Hampshire (CHARTS) |
||||
High Street and The Square, Petersfield |
565 |
|||
Access in the area of outstanding natural beauty |
18 |
|||
TAPESTRY |
30 |
|||
613 | ||||
Coastal Towns (CTTS) |
||||
Ashley Road/Spencer Road, New Milton (net) |
132 |
|||
132 | ||||
North East Hampshire (NEHTS) |
||||
A325/A30 Route 1 bus corridor (net) |
1,900 |
|||
Minley Road cycles (net) |
216 |
|||
NEHTS Intelligent Transport Systems |
80 |
|||
NEHTS cycle parking |
30 |
|||
2,226 | ||||
New Forest (NFTS) |
||||
No starts |
- |
|||
- | ||||
South West Hampshire (SWHTS) |
||||
Eastleigh safer routes to school |
365 |
|||
Eastleigh Bus Quality Partnership |
125 |
|||
Southern Test Valley BQP |
50 |
|||
Chandlers Ford railway station (net) |
2,200 |
|||
2,740 | ||||
South East Hampshire (SEHTS) |
||||
A3 Corridor Bus Priority, Widley to Purbrook - additional costs |
620 |
|||
A3 Corridor Bus Priority, Purbrook to Waterlooville - stage 2B |
5,300 |
|||
A27 Portchester Road, Fareham |
680 |
|||
Fareham railway station |
50 |
|||
Fareham bus station |
160 |
|||
Gosport Bus Station |
40 |
|||
Harts Farm Way, Broadmarsh |
110 |
|||
Havant Station Ticket Office |
50 |
|||
Castle Street, Portchester |
25 |
|||
Miller Drive, Fareham |
60 |
|||
Fareham Town Centre signing |
150 |
|||
Leigh Park to Portsmouth bus corridor |
40 |
|||
7,285 | ||||
Western Hampshire (WHTS) |
||||
No starts |
- |
|||
- | ||||
Winchester (WMAP) |
||||
Chesil Street Winchester |
260 |
|||
Stockbridge Road, Winchester |
390 |
|||
Winchester Station interchange |
930 |
|||
WMAP Car Park improvements |
50 |
|||
1,630 | ||||
Other Priority Schemes |
||||
Otterbourne traffic calming - stage 2 |
695 |
|||
695 | ||||
Minor Works |
||||
Titchfield Road, Stubbington - Pelican crossing |
35 |
|||
Butts Road, Alton - Toucan crossing |
54 |
|||
Ramshill, Petersfield - Puffin crossing |
35 |
|||
Lockswood Road, Locks Heath - Toucan crossing |
55 |
|||
Fernhill Road (Cove Junior School) - Puffin crossing |
36 |
|||
Fernhill Road (Cove Manor School) - Puffin crossing |
35 |
|||
Test Valley Borough decriminalised parking |
50 |
|||
MIRACLES Project, Winchester - stage 1 |
240 |
|||
Central Intelligent Transport Systems |
725 |
|||
Community safety initiative |
60 |
|||
Rural partnership schemes |
200 |
|||
Minor improvements |
200 |
|||
Community transport schemes |
330 |
|||
Passenger transport information |
125 |
|||
Safer routes to school |
100 |
|||
Rail stations/interchanges |
80 |
|||
Air quality and noise monitoring |
50 |
|||
2,410 | ||||
Other |
||||
South Hampshire Rapid Transport - preliminary costs (part) |
2,168 |
|||
Buriton closed landfill site |
49 |
|||
Coast Protection Act |
141 |
|||
Additional costs - 2000/01 and 2001/02 Starts Programmes |
526 |
|||
2,884 |
||||
Total SCA Schemes |
31,756 | |||
Locally Funded Schemes |
||||
Structural maintenance of non principal roads |
11,286 |
|||
Contribution to private street works |
60 |
|||
New plan printing equipment |
50 |
|||
South Hampshire Rapid Transit - preliminary costs (part) |
188 |
|||
Environmental improvements |
377 |
|||
Regeneration of older urban areas |
1,264 |
|||
Household waste recycling centres |
300 |
|||
Closed landfill sites remedial works |
58 |
|||
13,583 |
||||
Total Locally Funded Schemes |
13,583 | |||
Total of Schemes Started During the Year |
45,339 | |||
3 |
Schemes Carried Forward |
||
Scheme Title |
£'000 |
Reason for Delay | |
Jacobs Gutter Lane/Bury Road, Marchwood |
350 |
Start delayed to take advantage of lower traffic volumes during school holidays | |
Waterlooville Centre |
25 |
To co-ordinate with other works in the area | |
Lymington High Street |
40 |
Need for extensive consultation in environmentally sensitive area | |
B2177/B3354 Fishers Pond junction |
450 |
Need to avoid summer working in the vicinity of Marwell Zoo | |
A33 Sherfield-on-Loddon traffic calming |
40 |
Need to fully assess effects of experimental measures | |
Basingstoke Real Time information |
170 |
Need to co-ordinate with the implementation of the Real Time information central system | |
A3 Corridor Bus Priority - stage 2A (Purbrook) |
1,300 |
Completion of consultation with local businesses and residents. | |
2,375 |
|||
4 |
Externally Funded Schemes Started in 2002/03 |
£'000 |
|
Andover Area (ATS) |
|||
Floral Way, Andover - traffic calming |
120 |
||
Basingstoke (BEST) |
|||
Basingstoke bus station departure information |
300 |
||
Hatch Warren to Town Centre cycle route |
750 |
||
Hanmore Road traffic management |
25 |
||
Whitchurch pedestrian cycle and bus facilities |
75 |
||
Central Hampshire (CHARTS) |
|||
Westhill Road North, South Wonston |
8 |
||
Coastal Towns (CTTS) |
|||
Ashley Road/Spencer Road, New Milton (contribution) |
5 |
||
North East Hampshire (NEHTS) |
|||
A325/A30 Route 1 bus corridor (contribution) |
700 |
||
Farnborough Town Centre signs |
125 |
||
Minley Road cycles (contribution) |
120 |
||
Blackwater Station pedestrians and cycles |
60 |
||
New Forest (NFHT) |
|||
Bickerley Road, Ringwood |
50 |
||
South West Hampshire Area (SWHTS) |
|||
Fair Oak Road, Fair Oak - cycle scheme (contribution) |
150 |
||
Wildern School, Hedge End - footways |
12 |
||
Chalk Hill/West End Road junction |
49 |
||
St John's Road, Hedge End |
8 |
||
Hedge End to Botley cycle scheme |
200 |
||
Tollbar Way/Charles Watts Way, Hedge End |
3 |
||
Chandlers Ford Railway Station (contribution) |
1,200 |
||
Templars Way, Chandlers Ford - junction improvements |
220 |
||
South East Hampshire (SEHTS) |
|||
Abshot Road/Warsash Road, Warsash |
400 |
||
Witherbed Lane footpath |
10 |
||
Yew Tree Drive local centre, Whiteley |
100 |
||
Outlands Lane, Curdridge |
45 |
||
Abshot Road/Hunts Pond Road, Locks Heath |
150 |
||
Other |
|||
Community transport vehicles |
303 |
||
5,188 |
|||
Appendix 8
Environment
Departmental Assurance Statement
1 |
Introduction |
1.1 |
The Accounts and Audit Regulation 1996 require the County Treasurer to maintain an adequate and effective internal audit. |
1.2 |
The County Treasurer employs an in-house internal audit section to provide an independent and objective appraisal function of reviewing the system of internal control. It examines, evaluates and reports to Chief Officers and the County Treasurer on the adequacy of the internal control as a contribution to the proper economic, efficient and effective use of resources. |
1.3 |
From 2002/03 The Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the UK requires that the Chief Internal Auditor provides an independent opinion on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal financial control operating in the County Council. The County Treasurer developed this during 2001/02 in preparation for the full requirement in 2002/03. To enable him to do this, an independent opinion on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control has been prepared for each department. |
2 |
Responsibilities |
2.1 |
It is a management responsibility to develop and maintain the internal control framework, and to ensure that resources are properly applied in the manner and on the activities intended. It is the responsibility of Internal Audit to form an independent opinion, based on reviews during the year, on the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control. |
3 |
Basis of opinion |
3.1 |
The strategic and annual internal audit plans were prepared by the Chief Internal Auditor to take account of the characteristics and relative risks of the activities involved and were approved by the County Treasurer. |
3.2 |
The internal audit plan has been delivered in accordance with the Auditing Practices Board's Guideline number 308, `Guidance for Internal Auditors'. |
3.3 |
Work has been planned and performed so as to obtain all the information and explanations which were considered necessary in order to provide sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the internal control system is operating effectively. However, this assurance can never be absolute. The most that the internal audit service can do is to provide reasonable assurance that there are no major weaknesses in the system of control. |
4 |
Opinion |
4.1 |
In our opinion the Environment department has an effective framework of control which provides reasonable assurance regarding the effective, efficient and economic achievement of the department's objectives. |
Ejner Knudsen Chief Internal Auditor County Treasurer's Department Hampshire County Council |
Appendix 9
Environment
Partnership Accounts 2002/03
1 |
Safety Camera Partnership | ||||
1.1 |
The Hampshire Safety Camera Partnership aims to improve road safety by using fine income to fund the installation of safety cameras. | ||||
1.2 |
The partnership includes six partners: Hampshire County Council, Magistrates Courts Committee, Southampton City Council, Portsmouth City Council, Isle of Wight Council and Hampshire Police Authority. Hampshire County Council is also the beneficiary of the funding from the Department for Transport. | ||||
1.2.1 |
Project Summary Statement | ||||
£ |
|||||
Opening balance 1 April 2002 |
- |
||||
Income |
2,383,596 |
||||
Expenditure |
1,270,485 |
||||
Closing balance 31 March 2003 |
1,113,111 |
||||
1.3 |
Income received from the DfT in the year was £2,364,354. Interest of £19,242 was earned on this account in the year. | ||||
1.4 |
Claims received from the partners from 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2003 totalled £1,270,485. | ||||
1.5 |
The balance on the account of £1,113,111 represents unused DfT funding which will be carried forward to 2003/04 subject to agreement of the audited final claim for 2002/03. It is likely that there will be a need to repay to the DfT part of the excess income received in 2002/03, or that their 2003/04 payments will be adjusted. This was due to scheme slippage, which has now been reflected in the 2003/04 business case. | ||||
2 |
Life 3 | ||||
2.1 |
The objective of the Life 3 project is to restore 604 ha of wetland habitat in the New Forest candidate Special Area of Conservation, and ensure their future sustainable management and regeneration. | ||||
2.2 |
The project began on 1 July 2002 and will run for four and a half years until 31 December 2006. The project has a total budget of €4,584,262, 40% of which is funded by the European Union. The remaining funds are sourced from the six partners: Hampshire County Council, Environment Agency, English Nature, Forestry Commission, National Trust and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. Hampshire County Council is also the beneficiary for the EU funds, with responsibility for receiving, verifying and paying claims from partners for their share of the EU funding. | ||||
2.3 |
All EU funds are received in Euros and all claims received from partners for their share of the EU funding are paid in Euros. | ||||
2.3.1 |
Project Summary statement | ||||
€ |
£ | ||||
Opening balance 1 April 2002 |
- |
- | |||
Income |
736,114 |
508,126 | |||
Expenditure |
20,786 |
14,307 | |||
Closing balance 31 March 2003 |
715,328 |
493,819 | |||
2.3.2 |
The expenditure represents the claims from all partners for the period 1 July to 30 November 2002 which have been authorised for payment. There are outstanding claims for three partners amounting to €16,762 which have not yet been authorised and therefore are not reflected in the above figures. The claims received for the period 1 December 2002 to 31 March 2003 have also not yet been verified and will therefore be recognised in the accounts in 2003/04. | ||||
2.3.3 |
The first tranche payment from the EU, representing 30% of the total budgeted EU funding, was received in October 2002. Interest earned on the Euro account for the year amounted to €2,632. | ||||
2.3.4 |
The closing balance of €715,328 will be carried forward to 2003/04. | ||||