Archived decisions

Hampshire County Council

Executive Member - Environment

23 July 2003

Project Appraisal: High Street/Market Place, Fordingbridge - junction enhancement scheme

Report of the Director of Environment

Item 7

Contact: Paul Basham, ext 6054

1. Summary

1.1 The following decision is sought:

    That the attached Project Appraisal for a junction enhancement scheme at the High Street/Market Place, Fordingbridge, at an estimated cost of £180,500, be approved.

2. Reason

2.1 To implement the enhancement scheme at the junction of High Street/Market Place, Fordingbridge. The scheme seeks to realign road junction space by reducing the area of land required for vehicles, to provide additional space for pedestrian movement.

2.2 Unfortunately, there is no other solution to avoid the British Telecom works. The British Telecom chamber does not have sufficient cover to allow a carriageway above it. To do so would mean raising the carriageway by 300 millimetres. This is not a feasible solution within the new junction layout.

3. Other Options Considered and Rejected

3.1 Earlier investigations by officers considered other layouts at the junction. These were a roundabout and change in priority from the existing to Provost Street/High Street. Both were considered unsuitable.

3.2 The roundabout would have caused increased queue lengths due to the nature of the flow at the junction. There is also an issue relating to space availability. Pedestrian areas would have been narrow in order to provide sufficient turning space for larger vehicles.

3.3 The change in junction priority would have resulted in increased queue lengths on the approaches to the junction due to the nature of vehicle flows. Queues would have occurred as vehicles negotiated a right turn into Shaftesbury Street.

4. Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Decision Maker or a Member or Officer Consulted - None.

5. Dispensation granted by the Standards Committee - Not applicable.

6. Reason(s) for the Matter being dealt with if Urgent - Not applicable.

Approved by: Date:

Councillor K B Estlin

HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

EXECUTIVE MEMBER - ENVIRONMENT

PROJECT APPRAISAL

_____________________________________________

23 JULY 2003

_____________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

PROJECT:

HIGH STREET/MARKET PLACE, FORDINGBRIDGE - JUNCTION ENHANCEMENT SCHEME

____________________________________________________________________

COMMENCEMENT DATE:

SEPTEMBER 2003

COMPLETION DATE:

NOVEMBER 2003

PLANNED YEAR OF START IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL PROGRAMME: 2003/04

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

1.

FINANCE (Client Department, Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services [Estates Practice] and County Treasurer)

____________________________________________________________________

Current

Capital

Estimate

Programme

(at July 03

(at July 03

prices)

prices)

Capital Expenditure

£'000

£'000

Land to be purchased

Nil

Nil

Construction

124.5

168

Fees

46.0

Consultation

10.0

180.5

168

Less developers/

12.5

other contributions

168

168

Financial provision for total scheme

Total Cost

1.

From Committees own resources

(a) Capital programme (as above)

168.0

(b) Developers contributions

7.5

(c) Environmental budget

5.0

180.5

2.

From other resources

(a)

(b)

(c)

TOTAL

180.5

Value of land for this project in HCC ownership £

Variations from capital programme

Revenue implications

£'000

% variation

to Committee's

budget

Net current expenditure

1.06

0.001

Capital charges

13.00

0.013

TOTAL net expenditure

14.06

0.014

____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

2.

STATEMENT OF NEED/JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECT

(Client Department)

____________________________________________________________________

The Fordingbridge junction enhancement scheme will give increased priority to pedestrians. The measures, combined with townscape features and careful choice of materials to complement the earlier work carried out in the High Street under the Country Towns Initiative, will provide additional space for pedestrians and an improved safer environment in this area of the High Street.

The Market Place junction is complex and demand for parking has almost entirely taken over an historic space for vehicle-related functions. This space is surrounded by historic buildings and is one of the focal points of the town, yet the only central feature is a multiple signpost standing on a central splitter island surrounded by a large expanse of road space.

On 6 November 2002 the New Forest Transportation Strategy Members' Panel was informed of progress made with the scheme, and support for the consultation plan was given.

____________________________________________________________________

3.

ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL (Client Department)

____________________________________________________________________

National/County Network and Policies

The scheme is within the New Forest Transport Strategy five year programme and accords with the strategy objectives.

Details of Scheme and Design Standards

The proposed junction layout is the result of a report prepared by Lisney Associates in February 1990, which was commissioned by the County Council to review the strategy and signing of the roads within Fordingbridge.

The proposed improvement scheme is shown on the attached plan. It involves realigning the road junction space, incorporating the following:

(i)

alteration of the existing junction layout, which has a central island, to form a `T' shaped junction;

(ii)

inclusion of a paved pedestrian area adjacent to the butcher's shop and in front of the Town Hall, which not only provides an improved facility for pedestrians but also increases the angle of deflection for vehicles travelling along the High Street into Provost Street, thus reducing vehicle speeds;

(iii)

introduction of coloured surfacing at the `T' junction to help slow traffic by raising driver awareness;

(iv)

provision of formal crossing points for pedestrians with dropped kerbs, tactile paving and coloured surfacing;

(v)

rationalisation of existing signs to reduce clutter and improve clarity for drivers;

(vi)

provision of slow markings on the approach to the junction from Shaftsbury Street to reduce vehicle speed; and

(vii)

provision of cycle parking facilities, improved lighting, a finger post sign and the planting of a tree.

Environmental Impact

The proposed scheme will reduce the amount of carriageway space at the junction, providing additional space for pedestrians, and include seating, cycle storage and a tree. These changes will improve the environment of the Market Place and surrounding area.

There will be the visual impact of coloured surfacing at the junction, however this will enhance driver awareness on approach.

Land Requirements

No land acquisition required. All works to be confined within existing public highway limits.

Statutory Procedures

Statutory procedures have already been completed regarding the removal of five car parking bays and one taxi bay, and amending the existing waiting restrictions to conform to the new junction layout. No objections were received.

Public Consultation

Public consultation was undertaken from 1-7 November 2002. The County Council has worked closely with New Forest District Council, Fordingbridge Town Council and District Councillor Shand.

There has been a great deal of consultation on the scheme with the local community, Fordingbridge Town Council, the Fordingbridge Society and New Forest District Council. As a result of consultation any areas of concern have been addressed. This has greatly assisted the development of an agreed scheme. All are supportive of the scheme.

District Councillor Shand had concerns in relation to deliveries to the butcher's shop, and where these would actually take place. This concern has now been resolved and the butcher is satisfied with the proposed arrangements.

Further information on public consultation is detailed in the attached appendix.

Over 200 people attended the exhibitions over the two day staffed period and 176 questionnaire responses were received by the deadline of 15 November 2002.

The proposals generated considerable debate locally and people were generally pleased that their views had been invited. A private viewing of the exhibition was held two hours before opening to the general public for Councillors and Town Council Members to attend and give their views.

Local Member's View

The local Member, Councillor Mrs Heron, fully supports the proposal.

Facilities for the Disabled

The scheme will incorporate dropped kerbs with tactile paving at all crossing points. The choice of flat materials for the pedestrian area is user-friendly for the mobility impaired.

The improvements will help contribute to a more inclusive society where everyone will share the benefits of increased prosperity and greater social inclusion.

Maintenance Implications

New street lighting will be provided at the junction, but the number of lighting columns will be comparable to the existing layout. Blockwork paving will be provided within the increased pedestrian area and there will be an increased maintenance cost with this material.

Crime and Disorder Act 1998

Under the scheme, the area will be better lit by the provision of new street lighting.

Sustainability

The proposed pedestrian and cycle facilities at the junction will support sustainable modes of transport. The narrowing of the carriageway and provision of dropped kerbs and tactile paving will make crossing easier for those accessing the shops, Town Hall and car parks.

____________________________________________________________________

4.

ROAD IMPROVEMENT - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

(Client Department)

____________________________________________________________________

Earlier investigations by officers considered other layouts at the junction. These were a roundabout and change in priority from the existing to Provost Street/High Street. Both were considered unsuitable.

The roundabout would have caused increased queue lengths due to the nature of the flow at the junction. There is also an issue relating to space availability. Pedestrian areas would have been narrow in order to provide sufficient turning space for larger vehicles.

The change in junction priority would have resulted in increased queue lengths on the approaches to the junction due to the nature of vehicle flows. Queues would have occurred as vehicles negotiated a right turn into Shaftesbury Street.

____________________________________________________________________

Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers

The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.

NB the list excludes:

1.

Published works.

2.

Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.

TITLE

LOCATION

None

7683/PB

APPENDIX

HIGH STREET/MARKET PLACE, FORDINGBRIDGE

JUNCTION ENHANCEMENT SCHEME

RESULTS OF CONSULTATION

Outcome of Consultation

In total 58% of people supported the scheme, 8% were neutral and 35% were against. 65% agreed the scheme would improve pedestrian safety and 72% agreed that the visual character would be enhanced as a result of the proposals, as shown in Table 1.

A large number of comments were received, including the movement of goods vehicles through the junction, traffic queues, pedestrian safety, loss of on-street parking and parking for delivery vehicles, misuse of the pedestrian area, traffic speeds, consideration of a roundabout and a by-pass. A number of respondents expressed strong support for the proposed scheme. The most frequently raised comments and the number of responses received are detailed in Table 2, as well as the officer response to the particular issues raised.

Ten items of correspondence were received, including letters from local residents and shop owners. Comments included suggestions regarding the change of priority for traffic in Fordingbridge, a mini-roundabout, removal of all on-street parking, congestion and banning large goods vehicles from the town centre. The need for the scheme was questioned, given that improvements for pedestrians, cyclists and the mobility impaired should not compromise traffic movements.

People who did not support the scheme provided their reasons. These mainly concerned expectations of longer traffic queues and movement of vehicles at the junction, predominantly by larger goods vehicles.

One of the concerns raised during the consultation period was the loss of one approach lane on Shaftsbury Street. Presently there are two lanes and both right-turning and left-turning vehicles can negotiate the junction at the same time. The proposed scheme would result in vehicles having to queue.

Surveys show that between the hours of 0700 and 1900 (a 12 hour period) a total of 231 vehicles approached the junction from Provost Street, negotiating a left hand turn into Shaftsbury Street (approximately 0.3 vehicles per minute) compared with 1,508 vehicles turning right out of Provost Street into the High Street (approximately 2.0 vehicles per minute). As a result of the relatively low vehicular flows at the junction, the existing situation is not expected to worsen. However, it is considered that the junction will become less confusing, allowing vehicles to exit the junction more quickly and efficiently and less likely to cause queueing.

One personal injury accident has been recorded at the junction over the last three years. This was a fatality and occurred on the carriageway outside the Crown Inn. However, this only considers reported incidents and does not take into account damage only incidents or near misses.

Local people expressed the need to remove unnecessary road space around the junction and provide extra pedestrian space, following consultations carried out in February 1990 by Lisney Associates for the Fordingbridge Spatial Master Plan. The size, extent and confusion at the junction has also been highlighted as a problem to motorists, along with signage clutter and inadequate lighting. Pedestrians feel vulnerable at the junction due to restricted space, inadequate crossing facilities and perceived traffic speeds. The scheme supports the improvement for a safer environment for all modes of transport, including walking, cycling and motor vehicles.

TABLE 1 - Public Consultation Questionnaire Reponses of Scheme Proposals

Scheme proposal

Support proposals

Neutral

Do not support proposals

Do you agree with the scheme proposals?

58%

7%

35%

Widening the pedestrian area and incorporating formal crossing points will improve priority in favour of pedestrians safety.

65%

12%

23%

The proposed scheme will improve priority in favour of pedestrians and cyclists.

48%

28%

24%

The introduction of the scheme will enhance the visual character of the junction.

72%

12%

16%

The proposed scheme would reduce signage clutter at the junction.

67%

15%

18%

Total

62%

15%

23%

TABLE 2

COMMENT/ISSUE

NO. OF COMMENTS/ ISSUES

COUNTY COUNCIL RESPONSE

Heavy goods vehicles will find the new junction layout difficult to negotiate.

16

All Heavy Commercial Vehicles (HCVs) that currently negotiate the junction will be able to negotiate the proposed layout without being forced to overrun kerbs or pedestrian areas. During the design process appropriate software has been used to check the vehicle paths of large lorries driving through the junction.

Nothing has been done to reduce problems with goods vehicles parking in the High Street.

8

County Council officers and the New Forest District Council's Conservation Officers have investigated how deliveries can be maintained and how to avoid making congestion worse at the new junction. The main businesses, the three inns and the butcher, have been consulted. Alternative delivery arrangements have been found for the Ship Inn and the butcher. There are unfortunately no alternatives for deliveries to the Crown Inn or the Royal Arms Hotel, however the new junction layout would not make congestion any worse.

The pedestrian area will be subject to misuse, particularly from youths leaving the pub.

14

The seating arrangements have been proposed and it is believed that the majority of people would benefit from this facility. Further advice is being sort from the Police at Lyndhurst New Forest Divisional Headquarters, particularly the issue of promoting the use of the area and therefore increasing natural surveillance.

Proposals will only add to the congestion problems in Fordingbridge.

8

The proposed scheme at the Market Place junction has been designed to shift priority away from the private car in favour of pedestrians and cyclists. The scheme would benefit and improve safety for all users of the junction and not, as suggested, encourage more traffic through the High Street.

No need for proposals as double yellow lines throughout town will do.

5

The proposed pedestrian area will improve safety at the junction for pedestrians and cyclists. This is achieved because vehicles will be deflected and encouraged to slow down. Double yellow lines at the Market Place junction would not achieve this, in fact vehicle speeds could increase due to the lack of deflection.

A controlled crossing is needed at the Market Place junction.

4

A controlled crossing at this junction would cause traffic to queue to unreasonable lengths. Pedestrian movements at this junction would not meet County requirements for controlled crossings.

Has a mini-roundabout been considered?

5

This has been considered as an option, however substantial deflection would need to be provided for which there is very limited space, due to proximity of frontages and lack of carriageway width. There would also be little scope to help pedestrians and cyclists, which is the main aim of the junction enhancements.

Has a by-pass been considered?

4

Traffic surveys conducted by the County Council in Fordingbridge have not shown any significant through movement of traffic. The majority of traffic is locally generated or HCVs passing through to the industrial site located to the west of Fordingbridge. Any proposals for a dual carriageway within the national park boundary would be contentious.