Archived decisions

Hampshire County Council

Executive Member for Policy and Resources Item

25 July 2003

Temporary Buildings

Report by the Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services

Contact: Keith Woodward Ext: 7938

1

Summary

1.1

The following decision is sought:

That approval be given to the continued support from the Landlords budget for the replacement of temporary buildings, particularly those in a poor and very poor condition.

2

Reason(s)

2.1

To ensure the timely removal of those temporary buildings in poor and very poor condition.

3

Other options considered and rejected

3.1

None.

4

Conflicts of interest declared by the decision-maker or a member or officer consulted

4.1

Not applicable

5

Dispensation granted by the Standards Committee

5.1

Not applicable

6

Reason(s) for the matter being dealt with if urgent

6.1

Not applicable

Approved by:

..........................

Date of decision:

.........................

Councillor T K Thornber

BLCP0703A Ref/Initials/23-Jul-03

Hampshire County Council

Buildings, Land and Contracts Panel Item

25 July 2003

Temporary Buildings

Report by the Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services

Contact: Keith Woodward Ext: 7938

1. Introduction

    The purpose of this report is to report on:

    · The number and condition of temporary buildings

    · The inspection strategy

    · Planned removals

    · The action and outcome in connection with the management of temporary buildings

2. Condition of Temporary Buildings

2.1 All temporary buildings are classified into one of four categories and may be summarised as follows:

Category

As at end May

2003

Good

111

Fair

52

Poor

27

Very Poor

39

Total

229

2.2 From the table in 3.1 above it can be seen that the current number of buildings in the "poor" and "very poor" categories is 66.

3. Corporate Risk Assessment (CRA)

3.1 The Corporate Risk Assessment (CRA) for the built estate places Temporary Buildings in equal sixth position when compared to other risks. The level of risk is defined as "high" with departmental performance on the issue currently assessed at "amber". It is planned to improve performance to "green" by introducing changes in the inspection strategy as described in Section 5 below.

4. Inspection Strategy

4.1 Regular inspections are undertaken of temporary buildings, the period between inspection being determined by their previously recorded condition as follows:

Condition

Inspection period

Good

3 years

Fair

2 years

Poor/very poor

One year

4.2 Each generic type of temporary building has been categorised as high, medium, or low priority for replacement, taking account of their characteristic weakness and deterioration, as indicated in the table below:

Priority

Summary

High

These are weak in design and suffering from deterioration, to the extent where they pose an increased risk of structural failure

Medium

The main structural elements are adequate by design, but the secondary elements are flimsy, fixings are inferior, or buildings prone to decay, so classified as medium risk

Low

These are modern volumetric units, where the manufacturer is still in business and able to provide generic structural calculations. Rapid deterioration of softwood frames and Plywood finish has been noted to the older units in this group. Therefore these units will advance to a higher risk with time.

4.3 Structural inspections have been carried out on all temporary buildings (excluding hired units and buildings under three years old). This has allowed the buildings to be individually prioritised by condition, taking account of generic weakness and deterioration of individual units.

4.4 A schedule of all temporary buildings by condition is given in Appendix A. Additional details of condition and proposed action to the medium and high priority buildings is given in Appendix B.

5. Replacement/Removal Strategy

5.1 At present 56 buildings are planned to be either replaced or removed and these may be summarised by category as follows:

Removal Priority

Number on CBR

Removal/ Replacement Planned

Balance

High

56

16

40

Medium

23

9

14

Low

103

8*

103

Hired

47

31

16

Total

229

56

173

    * Low priority units are suitable for reuse.

6. Conclusions

6.1 The risk presented by the known areas of weakness and decay has been managed by regular inspection and strengthening when necessary. The rate of deterioration and decay has taken over as the main area of structural concern. Repair instructions have been issued for items of immediate concern. Defects that present a lower risk will be reviewed at the next annual inspection and repairs undertaken then, should they become necessary.

6.2 All Temporary buildings have been inspected which turns this issue "green" under the Corporate Risk Assessment performance criteria.

6.3 There are a significant number of schemes in design that will allow the removal of 25% of all remaining temporary buildings within the next 18 months. A further 10% may be removed as part of other initiatives during that period.

7. Recommendation

That the Buildings, Land and Contracts Panel advise the Executive Member for Policy and Resources that approval be given to the continued support from the Landlords budget for the replacement of temporary buildings, particularly those in poor and very poor condition.

Section 100D - Local Government Act 1972 - Background Papers:

The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.

NB the list excludes:

1. Published works.

2. Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.

File Location

None. BLCP0703A