Archived decisions
DRAFT
Commissioning Strategy Action Plan 2003 - 2006
Objectives
Objective 1 : To promote the independence of Older People by enabling them to remain in their own homes wherever possible.
Priority Codes | |
1 |
Action in Hand |
2 |
Action planned over the next year |
3 |
Action planned in the medium term |
1(e) |
Accommodation: · Identify resources and outcomes from supporting people applicable to Older People; · Promote and evaluate pilot projects of the Millennium Homes concept. · Establish priority needs of Older People with respect to housing provision in each locality especially extra care housing. |
· Influence use of supporting people to achieve commissioning intentions. · Confirm role of millennium homes in support of commissioning intentions · Housing strategy in each locality identifies specific needs of Older People |
· Further pilot in East Hants being developed re: Millennium Homes · Extra care Housing bid options being explored |
2 |
JE CE |
1(e) |
PD and Sensory Action Plans Users and Carers (03/04) Direct Payments (03/04) Technician Service (03/04) Occupational Therapy Service (03/04) |
Risks |
- Stability of Additional C28 resources to 2006 - Achieving performance targets within a balanced budget and identified pressure of £2.3m in Domiciliary Care budget for 03/04 (based on 02/03 average activity) - Income analysis and impact through increasing non - chargeable IC Services. |
Priority Codes | |
1 |
Action in Hand |
2 |
Action planned over the next year |
3 |
Action planned in the medium term |
Objective 2 : To work with partner agencies to deliver standards and targets in the National Service Framework for Older People and NHS Plan.
Actions |
Outcomes/Results |
Current Performance/ Progress |
Priority |
Lead | |
2(a) |
Care Management: · Make consistent progress towards the implementation of SAP across the County; · Review implementation of NHS FNC · Review implementation of FACS; · Pilot Older People toolkit for use with new continuing care criteria and participate with evaluation and implement action; · Revise and redefine the care management practice framework with reference to above and the needs of reimbursement processes. · Increase the number of carers assessments and ensure that they are properly recorded on ACMS / SWIFT |
· SAP defined and implemented across Strategic Health Authority area by April 2004; · Recording and practice is in accordance with policy intentions. · The Continuing Care Criteria is applied consistently and in accordance with legal precedence and OP access Continuing Care funding effectively. · Care managers work within new frameworks consistently across the County · Reviewing / Assessment / CP indicators. · NHS FNC is secured consistently and integrated within CM framework |
· Progress across PCT's variable. SAP network meeting (06/03) will establish priority work areas · Project Manager in post to undertake review. · Plan needs developing to achieve level of reviews. · Guidance re-issued and Strategic Service Manager supporting 6 month CC pilot. · Strategic Service Manager's for FACS and SAP working together to revise manual, link with reimbursement project and develop training. · Implemented NHS FNC |
1 1 2 |
TT SG |
2(b) |
Delayed Transfers: · Develop and submit business case to secure contingency resources; · Continue to implement project plan for implementation of re-imbursement (01/01/04); · Develop services that are effective in assisting with hospital discharge but are consistent with long-term commissioning intentions. · Evidence associated activity throughput in DIS etc. (cross reference : (1C)) |
· 1/1/04 implementation target of (tbc) · £3.5m available in 03/04 to support performance; · Successful implementation of processes 1/1/04; · Services across the whole system are developed which support return to home at the earliest opportunity and avoid reliance on bed-based care. · DOH/SSI informed about whole approach and data collection definition · Delayed Discharge Performance Indicator. |
· Contingent resources identified; · Project Plan on schedule. · Service development underway to prevent admission and support discharge. To continue and be steered by gap map analysis. · Regular reporting across a variety of activities associated with delayed transfers. · Social Care Waits halved from 04/03 to 10/03 |
1 1 2 1 |
LW |
| Priority Codes 1 Action in Hand 2 Action planned over the next year 3 Action planned in the medium term 2(c) |
· Evaluate effectiveness of the different models of intermediate care developing across Hampshire County Council. (cross reference : (1C)) |
· Intermediate care targets (NSF) · Service developments for 04/05 informed by evaluation and cost effectiveness understood. |
· PMU leading evaluation Minimum data set being implemented. |
1 |
AW |
2(d) |
EMH Services · Determine County Policy on preferred model of service provision. · Engage specialist advisers to review and propose community developments. · Review and develop role of ASWs in OP Sector |
· EMH services are consistently provided across the County and most appropriately to meet needs: · Community provision is developed to improve outcomes for Older People with Mental Health needs. · EMH practice improves and effective work is undertaken for OPMH |
· Conference to discuss outcomes from residential consultation exercise has highlighted and signposted future actions. · Initial work begun on determining breadth of ASW role within County. · Joint Project with WHT to review integrated models. |
||
2(e) |
PD and Sensory Action Plans: · Technician services 03/04 · Sensory Services 03/04 · ICES Project 03/04 · Care Management 03/04 |
||||
Risks |
- Sustainability of additional delayed transfer resources to 2006 - especially if recruitment of additional Care Management posts to support reimbursement is permanent; - Balancing delayed discharge performance and cost of funding with potential stacked up costs if delays transferred to interim bed - based care. - Securing acceptable and adequate management information from which to measure performance on delays. |
Priority Codes | |
1 |
Action in Hand |
2 |
Action planned over the next year |
3 |
Action planned in the medium term |
Objective 3 : To refocus provision of long term residential and nursing care in line with the recommendations of the Best Value Review.
Actions |
Outcomes/Results |
Current Performance/ Progress |
Priority |
Lead | |
3(a) |
Develop strategy for the options to deliver Long Term residential and nursing home care for OPMH |
· Continuum of care across residential and nursing homes identified. · Capacity defined and procurement solutions determined with response implications. · Service specifications developed. |
· Practice model developed for in - house residential care and implementation begun; · Unit cost analysis underway for Nursing Home Strategy. · OPMH Strategy drafted. |
2 |
CP |
3(b) |
Develop costed models to meet identified gaps with associated pricing strategy. |
· 04/05 pricing negotiations informed by this work; · Resource redeployment identified across service headings. · PAF Unit Cost (Residential / Nursing Care) indicators. |
· Analysis of cost and effectiveness of EMH rate introduction underway. · Liaison with PCT over nursing home price initiated as joint commissioners. |
2 |
CP AE |
3(c) |
Determine market mix and role of in-house units in relation to the above including new nursing home beds. |
· Market gaps identified and addressed to 2006; · NCIS Service mix confirmed and implemented. · Resources secured for these developments. |
· NCIS initial service mix schedule prepared. · Provision of IC beds beginning to the analysed. · Nursing Home Project Plan meeting milestones. |
2 |
CF / AE CT / VO |
Risks |
- Increasing pressure for in-house units to increase staffing levels to meet NCSC inspection requirements and securing resources. - Developing a joint approach to market developments in NH care with PCTS - Identifying and securing ongoing revenue funding for new nursing homes. |
Priority Codes | |
1 |
Action in Hand |
2 |
Action planned over the next year |
3 |
Action planned in the medium term |
Objective 4 : Improve performance management and monitoring of service delivery including the quality of services
Actions |
Outcomes/Results |
Current Performance/ Progress |
Priority |
Lead | |
4(a) |
Work with PMU and IS Section to improve the availability of management information and quarterly reporting PAF indicators. |
· Effective management information reports available on a monthly basis. · PAF indicators will be reviewed at locality meetings quarterly through the availability of area - specific values. · New PM information officer for Older People supporting these developments. · SWIFT implementation will meet MI data capture needs. |
· Some activity / performance information available. · Area annual values available on request as are ad hoc requests for information. · PAG (Older People) implementing work plan to improve PI Quality. |
2 |
CF + Team (PMU + IS Section) |
4(b) |
Develop quality monitoring mechanisms for residential / nursing care particularly for clients with dementia. |
· Standards are set and monitored across residential / nursing home care. · Specifications for EMH care defined, monitored and improvements plans designed. |
· Initial work beginning on specifications for EMH care. |
3 |
CP |
4(c) |
Roll out model contract guidance and service specification for day care services. |
· Consistent standards of service across day care provision. · Day Care strategy and stakeholder event support these developments. |
· Workshop planned for December 03. |
2 |
CE |
Risks |
- Improvements in data integrity keeping pace with MI provision. - Achievement of ownership of data by operational groups while data quality issues emerge through increased availability |
Priority Codes | |
1 |
Action in Hand |
2 |
Action planned over the next year |
3 |
Action planned in the medium term |
Objective 5 : To continue to manage budgets effectively, ensuring investment and disinvestment decisions are consistent with policy intentions.
Actions |
Outcomes/Results |
Current Performance/ Progress |
Priority |
Lead | |
5(a) |
Re-cast local budgets to an agreed needs - based formula for implementation from 04/05 |
· Review and re-cast of historic models of allocation to produce more current and equitable allocations |
· FSS formula under consideration for possible use, along with impact of local pricing strategies. |
2 |
CF / FSU |
5(b) |
Produce financial modelling information to predict resource requirements to meet demands |
· Financial strategy developed for commissioning plan time frame. |
· Year on year activity projections being developed. |
2 |
CF + Team |
5(c) |
Produce activity and budget level baselines and projections against which investment and disinvestments can be tracked as well as impact analysis on performance |
· Modelling of resources, activity and performance supports service planning |
· Activity and budget baselines established. · Initial disinvestment proposals included in 03/04 budget schedules |
2 |
Team |
Risks |
- Implications of re-cast model will need long lead in time if significant shifts across areas are needed; - Ability to determine longer term (3 year) financial strategy (Commensurate with PCT LDP planning) |
Priority Codes | |
1 |
Action in Hand |
2 |
Action planned over the next year |
3 |
Action planned in the medium term |
Objective 6 : To develop the capacity of the workforce to deliver effective high quality services to Older People.
Actions |
Outcomes/Results |
Current Performance/ Progress |
Priority |
Lead | |
6(a) |
Identify necessary training to assure effective skill levels. |
· Specific and specialist skilled staff will be in post to provide services |
· Gap identified in meeting training needs for staff working with OPMH. · Shift in funding sources and meeting grant requirements being analysed - particularly responsibilities to independent sector. |
2 |
Team |
6(b) |
Ensure effective recruitment and retention policies are in place. |
· Vacancy levels / Sickness levels / turnover levels across areas/ different roles tracked and analysed. |
· Workgroup established to address problems in North of County |
1 |
CT / CF |
6(c) |
Review approach to workforce development across care sector and review elements of WDC strategy to meet needs for nurses in NHS for transferability |
· Plan is developed for meeting future needs for care staff across County |
· Involvement with WDC for NCIS and ongoing learning from their approach |
3 |
CF |
6(d) |
Workforce Plan 03/04 |
||||
6(f) |
Training Plan 03/04 |
||||
Risks |
- Competing for Care Staff cohort across similar service. |
Priority Codes | |
1 |
Action in Hand |
2 |
Action planned over the next year |
3 |
Action planned in the medium term |
2002 / 2003 Budgets are based on Period 13. |
2003 /2004 Budgets are based on the budgets as at period 4. |
Activity Information has been extracted from the Community Care Statistics. |
Average Costs are based on the annual gross cost. |
Base Activity for 2003/2004 has been calculated by analysing the Community Care |
Statistics for April - June 2003 in order to calculate an average for the year. |
Additional Activity |
In addition to these allocations, there is £3.5m available to meet the costs of achieving |
delayed discharges targets. The allocations are still to be made subject to the business |
plan being approved. |
Service Plan - Older People
Purchased & In-House Services 2002/2003
|
Average Activity |
Gross Budget |
Gross Expenditure |
Average Cost |
Variance Against budget |
|
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£ |
£'000 |
Residential |
2,622 |
45,043 |
43,571 |
16,615 |
(1,472) |
Nursing |
1,474 |
31,506 |
32,109 |
21,779 |
603 |
Day |
1,846 |
2,644 |
2,684 |
1,454 |
40 |
Domiciliary |
5,727 |
24,570 |
25,581 |
4,467 |
1,011 |
Fieldwork |
- |
5,462 |
5,368 |
- |
(94) |
Other |
- |
1,522 |
1,677 |
- |
155 |
Total |
11,670 |
110,747 |
110,990 |
- |
243 |
Purchased & In-House Services 2003/2004
|
Base Activity |
Base Budget |
Budgeted Average Spend |
Additional Funding |
Additional Planned Activity |
|
|
£'000 |
£ |
£'000 |
|
Residential |
2,540 |
41,756 |
16,439 |
500 |
(2) 243 |
Nursing |
1,616 |
32,454 |
20,083 |
0 |
- |
Day |
1,838 |
3,266 |
1,777 |
0 |
- |
Domiciliary |
5,603 |
27,257 |
4,865 |
3,255 |
(1) 958 |
Fieldwork |
- |
5,401 |
- |
745 |
(3) 24 (Staff) |
Other |
- |
1,352 |
- |
0 |
- |
Delayed Discharges |
- |
- |
- |
(4) 3,000 |
- |
Total |
11,597 |
111,486 |
- |
7,500 |
- |
N1 Purchased Services - Additional Activity
Allocation for improving achievement against C28 Performance Indicator. Actual activity is likely to be between 810 and 1106. 958 is the average. Some of this budget/activity may be agreed against in-house Home Care.
In-House Services - Additional Activity
N2 Residential
Provision of 28 Intermediate Care beds within the part III Homes. Additional activity based on client stays of 6 weeks.
N3 Fieldwork
Seven temporary Care Management Posts for reviewing and assessing current clients who may requires additional services that will, as a result meet the C28 Performance Indicator. The cost of these post is £245K.
There will be an additional 17 posts for the Reimbursement Project. The additional activity that these posts will create has not yet been identified. The cost is £500k
This creates an additional 24 Full Time Equivalent Posts
N4 There is an additional £3m to be allocated for delayed transfers of care.
This funding will be allocated to residential and domiciliary services, although the exact allocations have not yet been established