Archived decisions

AT A MEETING of the ENVIRONMENT POLICY REVIEW COMMITTEE held on 30 June 2004 at The Castle, Winchester.

PRESENT:

Councillors: PRC Hutcheson (Chairman); Mrs E M Byrom; C R H Davidovitz;

L T Dunsdon; W J Filer; M S Geddes; B T Gurden; Mrs K Heron; R J Kimber; T G Knight; P Luffman; M J Roberts; Sir James J Scott; J D Shaw and J K West.

Also in attendance: Councillor Capt K B Estlin and J K Glen.

Also in attendance at the invitation of the Chairman for Item 6 Visit of the Highways Agency: Councillors D G Allen; Mrs A E Bailey; I F E Beagley; F J Bright; K G Chapman; Dr R J Ellis; E F Gale; P K Mason; R C McIntosh; P A Pierce; J Stocks and Dr J G L Wall.

229. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Members were mindful that, where they believed they had a personal or personal prejudicial interest in any matter to be considered at the meeting, they should normally at the time of the debate declare their interest, and having regard to the circumstances described in paragraphs 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the County Council's Code of Conduct, consider whether to leave the meeting whilst the matter was discussed. No declarations were made.

230. MINUTES

      The Minutes of the meeting held on 5 May 2004 (Item 2 in the Minute Book)

      were confirmed by the Committee and signed by the Chairman.

231. CHAIRMAN'S COMMUNICATIONS

(i) Welcomed Stuart Jarvis to the appointment of Deputy Director of the

Environment Department.

    (ii) Thanked Debbie Vaughan for her assistance with the Environment

    PRC since its inauguration.

(iii) Welcomed Lindsey Hawke-Davies as Debbie's replacement on the

Environment PRC.

    (iv) Reported Councillor Davidovitz standing down as a Member of the

    PRC prior to commencing his role as a Cabinet Member with

    responsibility for internal and external communications,

    external relationships and efficiency with effect from 1 July 2004.

    (v) Reported the Government's announcement on the designation of the

    New Forest as a National Park but with the exclusion of Lymington,

    Avon Valley and Waterside from within the Park boundaries. It was

    noted that Fawley Power Station had also been included. It was noted

    that an appeal could be lodged against additions to the boundary but

    no right of appeal against deletions.

232. MEMBERS' QUESTIONS

No questions to the Executive Member for Environment or the Executive

Member for Spatial Strategy had been received.

233. DEPUTATIONS


No requests to make a deputation had been received.

234. VISIT OF THE HIGHWAYS AGENCY

The Chairman introduced Martin McMahon, Route Manager, Area 3

Team for Central Southern England (A34, A303 and M3), from the

Highways Agency who had been invited to attend the meeting to present the

Motorway and Trunk Road Network Programme for 2004/05 and Route

Management Strategies. He thanked the Chairman for the invitation to

address the Committee, welcomed the opportunity for the Highways Agency

to work more closely with the County Council and hoped that this first annual

meeting would strengthen the County Council's relationship with the

Highways Agency. He considered that these annual meetings would provide

Members with the opportunity to enter into discussion and raise questions

about policy, programmes of work and other matters relating to the motorway

and trunk road network.

Mr McMahon gave an interesting presentation which focussed on the whole

of the Hampshire Motorway and Trunk Road Network. The Works

Programme for 2004/05 in respect of Motorways and Trunk Roads was

detailed as follows subject to final budget confirmation:

      · M3 Junctions 4 to 8 rutting repairs

      · M3 Junction 8/A303 Link Roads

      · M27 Communications Upgrade

      · M27 Junction 11 Westbound Repairs

      · A27 Hillsea to Warbington lighting

      · A34 Whitchurch to Litchfield Resurfacing Phase 2

      The Route Management Strategies which had been designed to consider

      particular routes were identified as follows:

      · A3 desk study - underway

      · A34 final report due later this year for consultation

      · A303 final report published

      · Exeter to Southampton A30, A35 and A31 published in April 2002.

      · M3 public consultation shortly

      · South Coast M27 and A27 to Emsworth - Stakeholder workshop on

      14 July to which Hampshire County Council would be invited.

      Members noted that new Traffic Officers would be responsible for some of

      the duties of the Police on Motorways; these Officers were already operating in the West Midlands as a pilot and would appear on Motorways in

      Hampshire in Spring 2005. Copies of the leaflets on Highways Agency

      Traffic Officers and South East Road Works and Traffic Information and the

      Policy for Noise Mitigation on Trunk Roads and Motorways referred to by

      Martin McMahon in his presentation would be circulated separately to all

      members following the meeting.

      The Chairman advised that all Members of the County Council had been

      invited to attend the Policy Review Committee meeting for this item and to

      submit questions of a strategic nature to be answered by the Highways

      Agency. Mr McMahon answered Members' detailed questions and

      remained at the meeting in order to participate in the debate.


      Members were interested to hear that all schemes identified were subject to a

      vigorous process and funds were allocated on a priority basis following this

      process. 80% of the budget had been committed and a review of current

      schemes had taken place regarding the remaining 20%.

      At its meeting on 1 April 2004 the County Council referred the following

      Notice of Motion from Councillor J G L Wall to the Environment Policy

      Review Committee for consideration. As the visit of the Highways Agency

      had already been scheduled for the Environment Policy Review Committee

      meeting on 30 June 2004, it was agreed that this matter would be dealt

      with at that time.

      Councillor Wall addressed the Committee on his Motion:

      "Hampshire County Council calls on the Government to change the current

      Arrangements regarding the collection of litter on trunk roads.

The Highways Agency, which is responsible for all aspects of the highways

under their control except litter, should be required to either:

      (i) undertake this responsibility themselves to agreed standards;

or, preferably:

      (ii) resource district councils sufficiently to do the job properly, including

      all necessary equipment and operational support.

      (Currently, litter collection on trunk roads is the responsibility of district councils, who have neither the equipment nor adequate budgets to carry this out effectively and can only work on the highways at the discretion of the Highways Agency)

      If option (i) above is pursued, since District Councils are responsible for litter collection on all other roads, they should retain responsibility for overseeing the litter condition of the trunk roads within their area and have powers to enforce against the Highways Agency as necessary.

      The Chief Executive is instructed to write to the Minister of Transport with a request for prompt action on this matter on the lines suggested".

      Councillor Wall expanded on his Motion and considered that the specific

      locations for concern to be south from Whitchurch and south from Sutton

      Scotney on the A34. He raised concern about the appropriate clearance action

      being taken for litter on trunk roads.

The Chairman introduced Robert Heathcock, representing Winchester City

Council who gave a short presentation to put forward the City Council's

perspective as one of the waste collection authorities for the specific

locations concerned. He reported that current Health and Safety requirements

had led to a limited number of contractors who are equipped to undertake this

type of work which had resulted in difficulties in finding contractors able to

carry out the work and increased cost of delivering the service. District

Councils were also only responsible for litter collection on roads up to their

designated boundary which had led to inconsistent standards; for example,

only part of a trunk road being cleaned.


Mr Heathcock answered Members' detailed questions and remained at the

meeting in order to participate in the debate.

Mr McMahon, whilst recognising the problem, reported that the Highways

Agency did not have sufficient funds in its current budget to undertake this

work and that working partnerships with Local Authorities were being

developed to improve the service.

The Chairman thanked Mr McMahon for taking the time to attend the

meeting and giving input to the debate on what was a very important area of

concern for Members. Mr Heathcock was also thanked for attending on

behalf of Winchester City Council.

The Committee having heard all the points of view, agreed the following

recommendation to be submitted to the County Council on 22 July;-

RESOLVED

That this Council lobby Government for a change in the legislation regarding

responsibility for litter collection on trunk roads, so that this becomes the

responsibility of the Highways Agency with appropriate funding thereof.

235. TERM MAINTENANCE CONTRACT (RAYNESWAY)/HIGHWAY

PERFORMANCE

The Committee considered the report of the Director of Environment (Item 7

in the Minute Book) updating Members on the current situation regarding the

present highway Term Maintenance Contract. Mr Stewart Newell, Director of

Raynesway Construction Southern Limited as the County Council's Term

Maintenance Contractor, was in attendance for this item. The report was very

comprehensive and provided information on the current contract and some of

the issues affecting it.

During the course of discussions, officers addressed a number of concerns

raised by Members. In particular, Members emphasised the importance of

maintaining adequate street lighting, regular grass cutting and weed control

and welcomed Performance Indicators to measure the effectiveness of the

highway maintenance service. Members were asked to direct specific

questions to individual district based Assistant Chief Engineers and to the

Local Highway and Transport Advisory Panels which could react

appropriately.

RESOLVED:

      (i) That the report be noted.

      (ii) That the Director of Environment report back to the Environment

        Policy Review Committee on street lighting.

236. TRANSPORT CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2003/04 AND 2004/05 PROGRESS REPORT AND PROGRAMME AMENDMENTS

The Committee considered a report of the Director of Environment (Item 8 in

the Minute Book) detailing 2003/04 and 2004/05 programme amendments

which were proposed to reflect slippage in the programmes and variations in

costs in some of the schemes. Members noted that there were a number of

minor amendments to finalise the 2003/04 programme and changes to the

2004/05 programme to bring it into line with new strategy areas. Members

also noted that a review of developers' contributions would be undertaken to

identify funds to supplement schemes.

RESOLVED:

That the Executive Member for Environment be advised that:

      (i) The proposed final Transport Capital Programme for 2003/04 be

      approved as set out in Appendix 1.

      (ii) The proposed revised Transport Capital Programme for 2004/05 be

      approved as set out in Appendix 2.

237. FINAL ACCOUNTS 2003/04

The Committee considered a report of the Director of Environment (Item 9 in

the Minute Book) summarising the Environment Service spending in

2003/04. The County Treasurer confirmed that there was a net under-spend of

£36,000 (0.04%) against the 2003/04 adjusted revenue cash limit of £83m. It

was noted that expenditure for Waste Management had been lower than

estimated with a continued increase in recycling rates, and reductions had

been avoided on public transport despite an increase in pressures.

The Executive Member for Environment congratulated officers, at all levels,

for achieving such a good outturn which reflected a great deal of effort across

the Environment Department.

RESOLVED:

      (i) That the report be noted.

      (ii) That £18,000 of the under-spending in 2003/04 be carried forward and

        added to the 2004/05 budget as set out in paragraph 1.6 of the report.

      (iii) That the departmental assurance statement of the Chief Internal

      Auditor be noted.

238. IT STRATEGY

      The Committee considered a report of the Director of Environment (Item 10

      in the Minute Book) setting out how decisions on investment in Information

      and Communications Technology (ICT) were made and prioritised. Members noted that there was an ongoing active replacement programme for

      mainframe systems throughout the County Council.

RESOLVED;

That the report be noted.

239. ANNUAL REPORT ON COMPLIMENTS AND COMPLAINTS

MONITORING

The Committee considered a report of the Director of Environment (Item 11 in

the Minute Book) detailing complaints and compliments recorded during the

period April 2003 to March 2004 and following on from the Annual Report

covering the period April 2002 to March 2003 presented to the Committee on

29 October 2003. It was reported that the Environment Department was giving

consideration to rolling out Public Enquiry Manager (PEM), a type of contact

management system with the public, to all services to effectively capture

complaints.

RESOLVED:

      (i) That the report be noted

      (ii) That the specific action being taken to investigate feasibility of

      expanding the use of Public Enquiry Manager across the Environment

      Department be noted.

240. REQUESTS BY MEMBERS FOR ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AT A

FUTURE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE

The Committee considered requests submitted by Councillor Roberts as

follows:

"Rail aspects of Materials Recovery Facility at Holybourne"

"Outcome of the Government's Strategic Review of the Rail System"

"National Cycling and Walking Strategy Document"

      RESOLVED:

That these matters be added to the Committee's list of items for future

consideration.

241. ENVIRONMENT POLICY REVIEW COMMITTEE - FORWARD
PLAN

      The Committee considered the report of the Chief Executive and Director of

      Environment (Item 13 in the Minute Book) setting out issues for future

      consideration by the Committee.

      RESOLVED

      That a Sub Group of the Policy Review Committee be established

on a trial basis to review the process for future business by which Members

could request items to be considered by a future meeting of the Committee.

The Committee agreed that a Sub Group of 4 Members comprising the

Chairman, Vice- Chairman and 1 Liberal Democrat and 1 Labour be

appointed.

8aM76804