Archived decisions
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE MEMBER - SPATIAL STRATEGY |
PROJECT APPRAISAL |
_____________________________________________
12 OCTOBER 2004
_____________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
PROJECT: |
NORTH BADDESLEY - ROWNHAMS CYCLEWAY |
____________________________________________________________________
COMMENCEMENT DATE: |
OCTOBER 2004 |
COMPLETION DATE: |
APRIL 2005 |
PLANNED YEAR OF START IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL PROGRAMME: 2004/05 |
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
1. |
FINANCE (Client Department, Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services [Estates Practice] and County Treasurer) |
____________________________________________________________________
Current |
Capital | ||||
Estimate |
Programme | ||||
(at July 04 |
(at July 04 | ||||
prices) |
prices) | ||||
Capital Expenditure |
£'000 |
£'000 | |||
Land to be purchased |
Nil |
Nil | |||
Construction |
285 |
285 | |||
Fees |
115 |
115 | |||
Less developers/ |
|||||
other contributions |
|||||
400 |
400 | ||||
Financial provision for total scheme |
Total Cost | ||||
1. |
From Committees own resources |
||||
(a) Capital programme (as above) |
400 | ||||
(b) Other |
Nil | ||||
2. |
From other resources |
||||
(a) |
|||||
(b) |
|||||
(c) |
|||||
TOTAL |
400 | ||||
Value of land for this project in HCC ownership £ |
Nil | ||||
Variations from capital programme |
|||||
Revenue implications |
£'000 |
% variation | |||
to Committee's | |||||
budget | |||||
Net current expenditure |
3 |
0.003 | |||
Capital charges |
39 |
0.034 | |||
TOTAL net expenditure |
42 |
0.037 | |||
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
2. |
STATEMENT OF NEED/JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECT (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
Rownhams Lane is a busy road connecting North Baddesley and Rownhams, that has no footway or cycle tracks. The volume and speed of traffic on this road has been of concern to local residents for some considerable time. The road connects local residents with schools and the business areas of Southampton and Nursling. Traffic volumes on Rownhams Lane are currently around 5,800 vehicles per day of which 70 are cyclists. There are permanent ATCs (active traffic counts) in place along this route which will reflect future traffic increases. It is considered that this cycle route will provide a safe and attractive route to and from the surrounding area. The scheme will provide inter-urban links to existing cycle schemes in North Baddesley and Rownhams all along the A27 linking Botley Road and Whitenap Lane, which form part of the Test Valley cycle plan and Safer Routes to School for Mountbatten School. This scheme terminates at the northern end of Rownhams Lane at the Southampton City Council boundary. Southampton City Council is keen to promote further cross-boundary routes in the future, of which this route is one which ultimately leads to Southampton City Hospital. |
____________________________________________________________________
3. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
National/County Network and Policies | |
The proposal is consistent with the County Council's Central Hampshire Transport Strategy. | |
Details of Scheme and Design Standards | |
The construction of the cycle track will comply with Department for Transport and Hampshire County Council standards and the design has been the subject of safety audits. A location plan is attached. | |
Environmental Impact | |
Environmental concerns over the use and dependency on motor vehicles prompted a feasibility study to be carried out in this area, to promote cycling as an alternative form of transport as part of the County Council's strategy for the provision of integrated cycling facilities throughout the county. The study identified that along Rownhams Lane neither verge was wide enough to accommodate the width of a two-way cycleway without extensive accommodation works, lengthy negotiation for land and compulsory purchase orders, all of which would have a severe impact on the natural ecology of the adjacent areas. There are four Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) adjoining the site. The construction of a single lane route on the eastern side of Rownhams Lane would greatly reduce the impact on the local environment and was therefore considered to be the most suitable option. | |
Land Requirements | |
No land acquisition required. All works to be confined within existing public highway limits. | |
Statutory Procedures | |
None. | |
Public Consultation | |
Dialogue with Nursling and Rownhams Parish Council has been ongoing as the scheme has developed. | |
Local Member's View | |
The scheme is fully supported by Councillor Dowden. | |
Equalities | |
The proposed cycle track will separate fast moving motor vehicles from cyclists. | |
Maintenance Implications | |
The revenue implication of this proposal will be taken into account in the setting of the annual base budget. | |
Crime and Disorder Act 1998 | |
The provisions of this Act have no impact on this proposal. | |
Sustainability | |
The scheme will offer a safe and healthy alternative to the use of motor vehicles in this area, improving the environment for sustainable forms of transport and cycling. |
____________________________________________________________________
4. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
A project feasibility study investigated the possibility of constructing a cycle facility on both sides of Rownhams Lane. There are four Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) in this area and this option required land purchase, along with widespread removal of hedges and trees and substantial culverting or relocation of ditches and watercourses. The revised option to construct a two-way cycle track on the eastern side of the road was considered to be the most suitable option, avoiding lengthy negotiations for land and having the least impact on the environment. |
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers | |
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. | |
NB the list excludes: | |
1. |
Published works. |
2. |
Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act. |
TITLE |
LOCATION |
None. |
8932/BA