Archived decisions
Hampshire County Council Executive Member - Environment 7 December 2004 Hampshire Villages Initiative - Supplementary Programme Report of the Director of Environment |
Item 3 |
Contact: Linda Tartaglia-Kershaw, ext 6815
email: [email protected]
1. Summary
1.1 The report to the Executive Member for Environment on 13 July 2004, attached as Appendix 1, recommended 11 schemes for inclusion within 2004/05-2005/06 for the Hampshire Villages Initiative (HVI). Those schemes approved amounted to £116,750 leaving a balance £43,250 from the HVI budget for further schemes to be identified. This report sets out those further schemes which have subsequently been identified to meet the unallocated balance.
2. Aims and Objectives of the Programme
2.1 The HVI will tie-in with local aspirations expressed in Village Design Statements and other Government Initiatives, and can be expected to provide an opportunity to implement priorities for improvements that might be identified in the emerging community strategies. Essentially, the HVI will seek to add value by working in partnership with those communities where projects are already proposed, and which would benefit by having additional funds to ensure that the quality of work reflects the unique sense of place of Hampshire's villages. Match funding of 50% will normally be required as the level of financial contributions from the Initiative's partners, and will usually be an integral element of partnership working. However, there will be instances where a minimum 20% funding contribution will be accepted in certain circumstances. With regard to the schemes presented in this report, 50% funding contributions are being made by the partners for schemes, unless specifically stated as being less, and details are set out in the description of these schemes.
2.2 The HVI's objectives and selection criteria (see Appendix 2) were approved on 13 July 2004. The recommended schemes have been appraised against these objectives and the extent to which they support the County Council's strategic aims and initiatives.
3. Schemes Recommended for Inclusion Within the Programme
Mottisfont Village Entrance Signs
3.1 The Parish Council wishes to provide two village nameplates and a finger post to match the distinctive design of the existing signs within the village. The Parish Council intends to contribute £360 towards the cost of this project. Although the Parish Council has limited funds it is anxious to see the implementation of these signs which will complete the distinctive signing associated with the village. Proposed contribution: £1,800.
River Itchen Access Enhancements, Bishopstoke
3.2 The Parish Council want to improve a natural gravel `beach' alongside the River Itchen which is a popular attraction for local people in the summer months. Works will include: the provision of round timber walling to retain the upper bank; new railings to match the existing; new seating; and the renovation of two cast iron lamp columns in the adjoining churchyard of St Mary's. Although the Parish Council is not in a position to match fund this project it intends to contribute £3,000, which is over the minimum 20% contribution required towards its implementation. It is in the centre of the community where it will have a significant impact. Proposed contribution: £7,000.
Moyles Court Ford Protection, New Forest
3.3 Indiscriminate parking is eroding the wide verges and banks adjoining the ford at Moyles Court, a popular attraction on the edge of the New Forest. The Parish Council wishes to minimise erosion by using ditches and posts to control parking. Funding of 50% of the estimated scheme costs has been secured as partners' contributions, of which £5,000 is available from the Environment Department Highways Maintenance budget and £300 from the Parish Council. The District Council is prepared to contribute through staff resources to manage implementation of the scheme. The four-way partnership will be aimed at improving a popular destination for visitors to the New Forest. Proposed contribution: £5,000.
Hursley Village War Memorial
3.4 The project will be undertaken in partnership with the Parish Council and Winchester City Council, to enhance the setting of the war memorial which occupies a prominent position alongside the A31, Romsey Road. Suggested alterations to the design have produced a total cost for this scheme of £16,500. The Parish Council has a budget of £4,000 and Winchester City Council has offered to meet the balance remaining after the Parish Council and HVI contributions. Contribution: £5,000.
West Liss Village Green Enhancement
3.5 A design to improve The Plestor at West Liss has been prepared by the Parish Council and included within the Village Design Statement. Proposals include: the closure of a short length of highway and reduction in the adjoining road width to extend and enhance a Green which is the focal point of a small group of buildings; new surface materials; and re-routing overhead electricity cables below ground. The estimated cost of this project is £57,610. Although the full scheme would result in the HVI allocation being over budget, cost estimates show that it would be possible to complete a stand-alone first phase with the balance of the current allocation. This allocation would enable the most significant element of the scheme to be undertaken viz the enlargement of the Green, and would provide a foundation on which to seek further funding to carry out the additional works. This does not commit the County Council to any further funding contribution. Should there be a further phase it will need to be considered on its own merits against the HVI criteria at a future date. The parish has been asked to make a contribution which will be considered on 7 December 2004. Other partners are currently being approached to secure match funding, including the adjoining owners and the District Council. The scheme will be a positive improvement to this small community adjoining the Farnham Road and consequently have a significant impact in the public domain. Proposed contribution: £17,450.
4. Selection Criteria
4.1 All of these schemes have been assessed against the agreed criteria for the HVI and those recommended above meet the stated requirements. They have all been suggested by the local community and will have an impact on the public domain. The Parish Councils in Mottisfont, Hursley and West Liss have suggested designs which reflect local character and are of a high standard, while the design input by officers will ensure these standards are met in the Moyles Court and Bishopstoke proposals. All schemes will have an immediate and significant impact and will add value to the projects which the respective partner parish councils have suggested.
Recommendation
That approval be given for the following schemes to be included within the two year programme of the Hampshire Villages Initiative for 2004/05 and 2005/06, to meet the unallocated balance of £43,250:
2004/05-2005/06 |
£ Expenditure |
Mottisfont Village Entrance signs |
1,800 |
River Itchen Access Enhancements, Bishopstoke |
7,000 |
Moyles Court Ford Protection, New Forest |
5,000 |
Hursley Village War Memorial |
5,000 |
West Liss Village Green Enhancement |
17,450 |
Contingency/unallocated |
7,000 |
Total |
43,250 |
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers | |
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. | |
NB the list excludes: | |
1. |
Published works. |
2. |
Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act. |
TITLE |
LOCATION |
Report to Executive Member for Environment on 13 July 2004 |
Hantsweb Room 418, Ashburton Court West |
9072/LT-K
APPENDIX 1
Hampshire County Council Executive Member - Environment 13 July 2004 Hampshire Villages Initiative - Future Programme Report of the Director of Environment |
Item 6 |
Contact: Tony Munford, ext 6722 email: [email protected]
1. Summary
1.1 The following decision is sought:
That approval be given for the two year provisional programme amounting to £160,000 for the Hampshire Villages Initiative for 2004/05 and 2005/06, as follows:
2004/05-2005/06 Expenditure
Horndean £50,000
Hurstbourne Tarrant £10,000
Rowlands Castle £3,250
Headley £6,500
Wherwell £3,000
Kimpton £5,000
Little London £15,000
Easton £3,000
Steep £3,000
Ashford Hill £15,000
South Warnborough £3,000
Other schemes to be identified £43,250
Total £160,000
2. Reason
2.1 This decision supports the following Aims of the Corporate Strategy:
(i) Aim 2 (Stewardship of the Environment) by implementing environmental improvement schemes which enhance the distinctiveness and quality of Hampshire's villages and ensuring Hampshire remains a place where people want to live; and
(ii) Aim 4 (Building Strong and Safe Communities) by creating opportunities for village communities to address local environmental and traffic safety issues through partnership working, and enabling them to gain a better understanding of the local sense of place.
2.2 In order to implement the Hampshire Villages Initiative programme which currently has an annual budget provision of £80,000.
3. Other Options Considered and Rejected
3.1 Some suggested schemes have been considered in consultation with District Councils and others, having regard to their content and scale, but rejected in order to maintain a balance between competing interests and compliance with the approved objectives of the programme.
4. Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Decision Maker or Other Executive Member Consulted - None.
5. Dispensation granted by the Standards Committee - Not applicable.
6. Reason(s) for the Matter being dealt with if Urgent - Not applicable.
Approved by: Date:
Councillor K B Estlin
7. Introduction
7.1 This report identifies a two year provisional programme for the Hampshire Villages Initiative (HVI).
8. Aims and Objectives of the Programme
8.1 The HVI will tie in with local aspiration expressed in Village Design Statements and other Government Initiatives and can be expected to provide an opportunity to implement priorities for improvements that might be identified in the emerging community strategies. Essentially the HVI will seek to add value by working in partnership with those communities where projects are already proposed and which would benefit by having additional funds to ensure that the quality of work reflects the unique sense of place of Hampshire's villages. This would not necessarily preclude the implementation of individual projects identified on their own merits, although in such circumstances additional external resources will need to be sought.
8.2 The HVI's objectives and selection criteria were approved on 7 April 2004 (see Appendix 1). The recommended schemes have been appraised against these objectives and the extent to which they support the County Council's strategic aims and initiatives.
9. Proposed Programme for 2004/06
9.1 The process for nominations involves:
(i) lengthy lead-in times to identify opportunities within the existing and proposed highway improvement programme; and
(ii) the need to engage and consult parish and district councils and local communities that have already identified the need for environmental improvements.
It is therefore considered that a two year programme approved annually is the most effective and efficient way of delivering partnership projects.
9.2 A wide ranging consultation exercise (see Appendix 2) was undertaken to obtain suggestions for schemes to be included in the programme. Those schemes recommended for inclusion are set out in section 10. Those schemes which it is felt do not meet the criteria of the initiative and consequently have not been recommended for inclusion within the programme are set out in section 11.
10. Schemes Recommended for Inclusion within the Programme
Horndean
10.1 Improvements and approach to village centre along the Portsmouth Road, identified as an area requiring improvement in the Horndean Parish Village Design Statement. A financial commitment of £6,000 to the project has been made by East Hampshire District Council, which it is anticipated will include new paving, signs, street furniture and a rationalisation of existing parking and access arrangements. Proposed contribution: £50,000.
Hurstbourne Tarrant
10.2 The Safer Routes to School Project is soon to undertake work in Hurstbourne Tarrant following consultations with the Parish Council. A contribution by the HVI will enable the realignment of the junction between Church Street and the A343 and the use of better quality surface materials in keeping with the character of the village. Proposed contribution: £10,000.
Rowlands Castle
10.3 A few years ago some heritage style lamp columns were erected in the village. The Parish Council is keen to erect a further seven columns around The Green to replace the existing street lights. The Village Design Statement emphasised the special character of The Green which would be enhanced by light columns of a more traditional design. The Street Lighting Section is prepared to undertake the work of replacement but cannot meet the cost of the heritage columns. The Parish Council intends to contribute 50% towards the cost of this project. Proposed contribution: £3,250.
Headley
10.4 The Parish Council wishes to improve the signs at the entrance and within the village. This would provide the opportunity of providing distinctive signs within an appropriate setting to both Headley and the adjoining village of Arford. Proposed contribution: £6,500.
Wherwell
10.5 Parked cars are forcing other drivers onto the grassed area of the War Memorial in Wherwell damaging the grass and the posts and chain which surround the memorial. The Parish Council wishes to reduce the width of the carriageway to discourage parking, reduce damage and enhance the appearance of this focal point within the village. The scheme would be undertaken in liaison with the Chief Engineer (West). Proposed contribution: £3,000.
Kimpton
10.6 The Parish Council wishes to provide a small appropriately surfaced area on The Green to prevent damage which is occurring at the moment and to treat the edge which is becoming eroded. Proposed contribution: £5,000.
Little London
10.7 The narrow carriageway of Silchester Road as it crosses a tributary of the River Loddon within the village has prevented the construction of a footpath on this particular stretch of road which also bends sharply at this point. The HVI would assist with the construction of a sympathetically designed wooden pedestrian footbridge to be located adjacent to the existing road bridge. The Parish Council is supportive of the project. Proposed contribution: £15,000.
Easton
10.8 The Traffic Management Group is considering proposals for improving the junction between Easton Lane and Chapel Lane in the centre of the village. Partnership working with the HVI will enable a higher specification of materials, more in keeping with the character of the village, than would otherwise be the case. Proposed contribution: £3,000.
Steep
10.9 The Traffic Management Group is considering proposals for a new footpath, gateway treatments and signing in Steep. Partnership with the HVI would assist in providing traditional signs where required and a higher specification of materials. Proposed contribution: £3,000.
Ashford Hill
10.10 A long standing commitment to provide traffic calming and enhance pedestrian facilities in the village, includes constructing a footway and wooden bridge to connect the Post Office/pub with the rest of the village. The footbridge would be across a tributary of the river Enborne adjacent to the narrow B3051. The land on which the bridge would be built is a Site of Special Scientific Interest, which was dedicated to the public highway in the 1960s. English Nature supports the proposal and is prepared to allow the construction of a wooden bridge together with access. The scheme would be a partnership between the HVI, English Nature and the Traffic Management Group. Proposed contribution: £15,000.
South Warnborough
10.11 Following major traffic calming to reduce speeds through the centre of the village (B3349) and an extension of the length of road subject to a speed limit within the village, four new entrance signs are required to assist with improving the quality of the environment. This project would be undertaken in partnership with the Traffic Management Group. Proposed contribution: £3,000.
Project Costs/Contributions
10.12 It should be noted that the total project costs and contributions for the schemes have not yet been resolved. If necessary a revised programme will be prepared and resubmitted.
11. Schemes Not Recommended for Inclusion within the Programme
Olivers Battery
11.1 The Parish Council wishes to mark the entrance into Olivers Battery from Badger Farm Road. This scheme would entail the rebuilding of a wall in traditional materials using brick and flint as part of the improvements to the Badger Farm Road/Olivers Battery Road junction. However this road improvement is not included in the current road programme.
11.2 Winchester City Council's Museums Service is proposing a Community Heritage project based in the Olivers Battery area. The project is at the inaugural stage and while it may eventually propose works that the HVI could assist with, it is too early for consideration of this project.
Central Swanmore
11.3 A project for Central Swanmore had already been identified by the Country Towns Initiative and £50,000 has been allowed for the 2005/06 financial year.
Hamble-le-Rice
11.4 The Parish Council is involved in a project at Well Lane to surface a footpath, provide an information board and, in conjunction with the Recreation and Heritage Department, to reinstate a village pump. However, Hamble-le-Rice is the subject of ongoing works by the Regeneration of Older Urban Areas Programme and it is felt that the resources of the HVI would in this instance be best served elsewhere.
Portchester Castle
11.5 It is suggested that the HVI in conjunction with English Heritage floodlight Portchester Castle. Such a project is not a high priority for Fareham Borough Council. English Heritage prioritises works within its budget and, while it intends to improve the interpretive displays at Portchester Castle in the near future, it has no budget for floodlighting the Castle.
Portchester Precinct
11.6 It is suggested that the Portchester Precinct needs improving but substantial works were undertaken five years ago and Fareham Borough Council, the obvious partner for such a scheme, will not be re-visiting the project. Portchester has been the subject of work by the Regeneration of Older Urban Areas Programme.
North Baddesley
11.7 The Parish Council has requested that five benches in the North Baddesley Recreation Ground be replaced and that the bus shelter maintained by the parish be repaired. Although the County Council has previously undertaken work in the area, the replacement of the benches and repair of the shelter could be regarded as maintenance rather than the implementation of an overall enhancement scheme.
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers | |
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. | |
NB the list excludes: | |
1. |
Published works. |
2. |
Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act. |
TITLE |
LOCATION |
None |
8779/TM
APPENDIX 2
THE HAMPSHIRE VILLAGES INITIATIVE
The Hampshire Villages Initiative was set up to carry out schemes of environmental enhancement in Hampshire's villages. In recent years countryside issues have increasingly become a focus for the Government and other organisations and the Hampshire Villages Initiative is in line with Hampshire County Council's commitment to maintain and extend investment in the rural community.
Aims and Objectives
The Initiative, with its emphasis on partnership working to address local environmental and traffic safety issues through schemes which enhance the distinctiveness and quality of Hampshire's villages, brings into focus the three Council corporate aims:
(i) Maximising Life Opportunities;
(ii) Stewardship of the Environment;
(iii) Building Strong and Safe Communities.
Within the remit of these strategic aims a number of specific objectives have been formulated to establish guidelines for future projects. The Hampshire Villages Initiative will:
(i) Facilitate schemes of enhancement which are of the highest standard
A pre-requisite of any project undertaken by the Hampshire Villages Initiative is that it should be of a high standard of design. This objective applies to the whole project and encompasses the overall design through to the choice of materials.
(ii) Impact on the public domain
This does not imply that projects necessarily have to be carried out on land within the public ownership, but they must contribute to the overall scene within a village and be of benefit to the community at large.
(iii) Reflect the wishes of the local community
All projects should reflect the wishes of the local community, expressed through the Parish Council or other local organisations, or be the subject of a consultation exercise undertaken expressly to elicit a response to a particular scheme.
(iv) Reflect local character
Each village has its own unique sense of place which may well be defined in a Village Design Statement. Schemes must reflect this character through, for example, design solutions, the choice of materials, the use of plants and the selection of street furniture.
Selection Criteria
Within the four overall objectives, schemes to be included within the programme should be within the public domain and seek to achieve the following:
(i) create a sense of identity and place, including on arrival at the village;
(ii) remedy an existing eyesore;
(iii) have an individual treatment based on the distinctiveness of each village;
(iv) have immediate and significant impact;
(v) reduce street clutter; and
(vi) partnership match funding of 50%, or in special circumstances a minimum of 20%.
Priority will be given to schemes which:
(i) inspire a continuing programme of improvement beyond the immediate project;
(ii) link and add value to the existing highway or other environmental schemes;
(iii) offer the likelihood of attracting additional funding from other public and private sources; and
(iv) enjoy a high level of local support.
Links to Other Programmes
The Initiative will tie-in with local aspirations expressed through parish and district councils, local councillors or identified in Parish Plans, Village Design Statements and other Government Initiatives including the emerging community strategies. While the Hampshire Villages Initiative may be involved in the implementation of projects identified on their own merits it is anticipated that the Initiative will principally build on and add value to existing programmes including those initiated by local and parish councils as well as the County Council's own Highways Capital and Maintenance Programmes and the Safer Routes to School Programme.
Emphasis on Quality
The Initiative will aim for high standards of workmanship and ensure that landscape planting, paving and street furniture with which the Initiative is likely to be involved reflect the quality and appropriateness reflective of the unique sense of place of Hampshire Villages. To this end the emphasis will be on:
(i) the use of heavier than normal landscape planting to create an immediate impact;
(ii) the use of materials which exceed `standard' treatments;
(iii) the inclusion of street lighting and street furniture which is attractive and well coordinated; and
(iv) the promotion of opportunities, where possible, of public art.