Archived decisions
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE MEMBER - SPATIAL STRATEGY |
Item 4 PROJECT APPRAISAL |
_____________________________________________
7 DECEMBER 2004
_____________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
PROJECT: |
A327 SUMMIT AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLE ROUTE |
____________________________________________________________________
COMMENCEMENT DATE: |
JANUARY 2005 |
COMPLETION DATE: |
MARCH 2005 |
PLANNED YEAR OF START IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL PROGRAMME: 2004/05 |
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
1. |
FINANCE (Client Department, Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services [Estates Practice] and County Treasurer) |
____________________________________________________________________
Current |
Capital | ||||
Estimate |
Programme | ||||
(at 2004 |
(at 2004 | ||||
prices) |
prices) | ||||
Capital Expenditure |
£'000 |
£'000 | |||
Land to be purchased |
Nil |
Nil | |||
Construction |
280 |
280 | |||
Fees |
40 |
40 | |||
320 |
320 | ||||
Less developers/ |
220 |
220 | |||
other contributions |
|||||
100 |
100 | ||||
Financial provision for total scheme |
Total Cost | ||||
1. |
From Committees own resources |
||||
(a) Capital programme (as above) |
100 | ||||
(b) Other |
|||||
2. |
From other resources |
||||
(a) Slough Estates |
220 | ||||
(b) |
|||||
(c) |
|||||
TOTAL |
320 | ||||
Value of land for this project in HCC ownership £ |
|||||
Variations from capital programme |
|||||
Revenue implications |
£'000 |
% variation | |||
to Committee's | |||||
Budget | |||||
Net current expenditure |
2 |
0.002 | |||
Capital charges |
31 |
0.027 | |||
TOTAL net expenditure |
33 |
0.029 | |||
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
2. |
STATEMENT OF NEED/JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECT (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
The A327 Summit Avenue has a traffic flow of around 14,000 vehicles per day, with housing, schooling, shopping, recreational facilities and a business park all running alongside. Currently, on the route of the proposed scheme, there are large sections with no footways or cycle paths. The need for these to be implemented can be seen through the evidence of unofficial pedestrian track wear on the verges, and a high volume of cyclists, 45 on the day of monitoring, using the road as a link between two current off-road routes at either end of the A327 Summit Avenue. The provision of a shared pedestrian footway/cycle track to link in with the existing routes. |
____________________________________________________________________
3. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
National/County Network and Policies | |
The proposal is consistent with the County Council's Local Transport Policy, North Hampshire Transport Strategy and Rushmoor Borough Council's Cycle Plan. It will provide safer and improved facilities for pedestrians and cyclists, and so assist reduction in the reliance on the car. | |
Details of Scheme and Design Standards | |
The installation of the shared pedestrian/cycle path, along with central island refuges at the crossing points, comply with Department for Transport and Hampshire County Council standards and the design has received a safety audit. A location plan is attached and a detailed plan will be displayed at the meeting. | |
Environmental Impact | |
There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this proposal. |
Land Requirements | |
No land acquisition required. All works to be confined within existing public highway limits. | |
Statutory Procedures | |
The sections of footway identified on the scheme drawings as being for shared use by pedestrians and cyclists will be converted by approval of this Project Appraisal, using powers provided under Section 65 of the Highways Act 1980. | |
Public Consultation | |
Consultation with the public was carried out on 6 and 7 February 2004, with a public exhibition. The event was advertised through a local free issue newspaper. The majority of comments showed support of the scheme. | |
Local Member's View | |
The local Member, Councillor Sheehan, has been informed. | |
Equalities | |
The proposed footways will provide access to all, and the proposed crossing points will incorporate tactile paving for the visually impaired, with flush kerbs at the crossing points for wheelchairs, prams and the less mobile. | |
Maintenance Implications | |
The revenue implications of this proposal will be taken into account in the setting of the annual budget. | |
Crime and Disorder Act 1998 | |
The provisions of this Act have no impact on this proposal. | |
Sustainability | |
The scheme will encourage walking and cycling as an alternative to the car in the localised area. The presence of signage and central refuges will assist in reducing vehicle speeds. Wherever possible recycled materials are to be used for the construction of this scheme. |
____________________________________________________________________
4. |
ROAD IMPROVEMENT - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED (Client Department) |
____________________________________________________________________
A split level pedestrian and cycle path on the north side of the A327 Summit Avenue was considered and publicly consulted on in 2002. However it was believed that the southern side offered the safer option and would cater for higher usage. The split level option was considered unacceptable in both safety and cost terms. |
Recommendations
1. That this Project Appraisal for the implementation of a shared cycle track/footway along the A327 Summit Avenue between the Nokia Development and Elles Road, Farnborough, and the associated street lighting replacement to bring it up to current standards, at an estimated cost of £320,000, be approved.
2. That, under the powers contained in Sections 65 and 66 of the Highways Act 1980, the section of footway identified within the proposal as `shared use' be converted to cycle tracks to permit use by cyclists and pedestrians.
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers | |
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. | |
NB the list excludes: | |
1. |
Published works. |
2. |
Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act. |
TITLE |
LOCATION |
None. |
9039PA/MG