Archived decisions
]AT A MEETING of the GOSPORT PENINSULA ACCESS PANEL held on Thursday 20 January 2005 at the Civic Offices, Fareham.
PRESENT:
Hampshire County Council
Councillors: K.B. Estlin; T.G. Knight; R.H. Price.
Fareham Borough Council
Councillors: J.V. Bryant; P.J. Davies; A. Mandry.
Gosport Borough Council
Councillors: P. Langdon; K. Searle
1. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN
RESOLVED:
That Councillor T.G. Knight (Hampshire County Council) be appointed
Chairman of the Panel for the ensuing year.
_____________________________________________
COUNCILLOR T.G. KNIGHT IN THE CHAIR
_____________________________________________
2. APPOINTMENT OF VICE - CHAIRMAN
That Councillor P. Langdon (Gosport Borough Council) be appointed
Vice - Chairman of the Panel for the ensuing year.
3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Members were mindful that, where they believed they had a personal or personal prejudicial interest in any matter to be considered at the meeting, they should, normally at the time of debate declare their interest, and having regards to the circumstances described in paragraphs 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the County Council's Code of Conduct, consider whether to leave the meeting whilst the matter was discussed.
4. CHAIRMAN'S COMMUNICATIONS
There were no Chairman's communications.
5. DEPUTATIONS
There were no deputations.
6. TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Panel considered the report of the Chief Executive (Item 6 in the Minute Book) setting out the Terms of Reference for the Gosport Peninsula Access Panel.
RESOLVED:
That the report be noted.
7. MINUTES
The Minutes of the Light Rapid Transit Development Panel held on 21 April 2004 were received for information.
8. LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN/SOUTH EAST PLAN
The Panel received an oral report of the Director of Environment on the Local
Transport Plan.
The report focussed on the process and broad outline content for the new Local
Transport Plan and covered the Government's main themes for the second
round of Local Transport Plans namely congestion, accessibility, road safety
and air quality. Councils had been asked to structure their LTPs around these
priorities.
The proposed approach of the County Council was outlined including suggested
additional objectives of economic prosperity, quality of life and asset
management. The overall approach and process were also outlined including
provisions for consultation, potential programmes and proposed timetable.
During the course of discussions, Members questions were answered. A formula
which would determine the allocation of funding was awaited. The expectation
to tackle congestion and reduce the number of vehicles on the road would be
considered by the Transport Strategy Panels at their meetings later on in January
2005. Further Panel meetings in March would consider suggested ideas and
major Schemes and the Panel meetings in June would consider the provisional
Local Transport Plan.
Members emphasised the importance of cross boundary working between
district authorities to ensure service delivery on this important issue and in the
longer term on emerging issues to consider joint working with Southampton and
Portsmouth City Councils.
In respect of the South East Plan, Members were advised on the programme of
further technical work carried out in the sub regions to identify costs and
infrastructure options and to develop a transportation strategy and
implementation plan.
The Director of Environment further advised that research into infrastructure
investment needed in the region for 2006-2026 was being carried out. The
existing infrastructure had been acknowledged as being already at or over
capacity in some areas. A programme of work was already in hand to identify
the existing infrastructure deficit along with an estimate of traffic growth under
different scenarios.
The Director of Environment advised that the traffic leaving Fareham at peak
times and the traffic travelling from Fareham to Gosport was acute; during the
following couple of months a study would identify the volume of traffic.
Members agreed that joint working with District Authorities and neighbouring
Authorities together with Southampton, Portsmouth and Isle of Wight was
essential to ensure that problems of growth and transport problems are tackled.
Members noted the problems of growth and transport issues and expressed
concern that an increase in growth would exacerbate the transport problems
even further. The need for good infrastructure to tackle the problems was
highlighted.
RESOLVED
(i) That the oral report of the Director of Environment be noted.
(ii) That a Member and Officer Panel be established to identify the
infrastructure deficit in transport terms in the area.
9. SCHEME UPDATE
The Director of Environment provided an update on the 2004/05 Programme
and partnership working with Districts to ensure service delivery.
The Fareham - Gosport Bus Quality Partnership scheme was looking at a Bus
Departure Information System (BDIS) at Gosport Bus Station to improve the
quality of passenger transport information through the provision of electronic
boards at each bus departure bay giving up to date information about bus
departure times, destinations, departure bay and variations to the timetable. The
provision of a Real Time Information System (RTPI) along the A32 between
Fareham and Gosport will improve the quality of up to date service information
for passengers along the route through the provision of electronic message
boards within the bus shelters.
The Lee-on-the-Solent Sustainable Suburbs scheme was looking at proposals to
improve road safety and road crossing opportunities to assist pedestrians and
the mobility impaired in the High Street area of Lee-on-the-Solent.
In respect of the Broom Way Cycleway scheme which would provide an off-
road shared footway and cycleway on the western side of the carriageway
together with street lighting to provide a safer and more attractive route for
pedestrians and cyclists.
In the Fareham area new schemes had been included: Newgate Lane/ Tukes
Avenue cycleway, Westbury Road footpath improvements, Salterns Lane traffic
calming and Segensworth provision of toucan crossings.
The Director of Environment further reported that the main objective of the
cycle ways was to provide the missing links and access to villages and town
centres. The overall package of measures was dependent on the Light Rapid
Transit Scheme.
RESOLVED
That the oral report of the Director of Environment be noted.
10. SOUTH HAMPSHIRE RAPID TRANSIT UPDATE
The SHRT-1 Project Director reported that Central Government had announced
in July 2004 that the Tram projects for Hampshire, Manchester and Leeds had
not been approved and that there was an emerging policy of Government
towards light rail. A meeting with Senior Civil Servants in August 2004 had
resulted in advice being given not to abandon the Scheme and there were strong
indications of surprise that Hampshire County Council had not been successful.
Further work on the Scheme had been advocated and so working up a scheme
to comply with the new policy was now taking place.
The Project Director further advised that there were issues about affordability
of the full scheme and changes to the project scope had been investigated to
reduce the funding requirement.
Members noted that the evaluation of the modified procurement suggested
that project costs could be reduced significantly to a level which would support
a strong case for funding to be reinstated. Accordingly there would be a further
preliminary funding submission to Government in March 2005 with a
request for an early decision.
The Project Director further advised that the work of this Panel provided the
opportunity to consider a complementary bus network for the SHRT project.
RESOLVED
That the oral report of the SHRT-1 Project Director be noted.
11. DEVELOPMENT OF GOSPORT PENINSULA ACCESS STRATEGY
The Director of Environment reported that revision to the Gosport Access
Strategy had taken into account development and would provide a Strategy to
inform spending on the Light Rapid Transit Development. A 5 year programme
of small measures and a programme of major schemes would look at the wider
network.
The Director of Environment advised that through the work programme
solutions, road network and travel patterns would be considered with partnership
working between Fareham and Gosport Borough Councils.
Members identified subjects for future work including the Fareham Gosport
Railway Interchange and the Stubbington By-pass which would be seen as
complementary schemes to the Light Rapid Transit Scheme and would proceed
at the same time as the South East Plan.
RESOLVED
That the oral report of the Director of Environment be noted.
12. WORK PROGRAMME
The Director of Environment advised that Officers would produce a report to a
future meeting on the work carried out to date and the options available.
RESOLVED
That the oral report of the Director of Environment be noted.
13. DATE OF NEXT MEETING
It was agreed that the Chief Executive would seek dates from Members of the
Panel to hold a workshop at the end of February or early March 2005.