Archived decisions

Appendix 4

RECREATION AND HERITAGE

COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICE

REPORT ON COMMUNITY BUILDINGS FUND

FINANCIAL YEAR 2004/05

    The impact of the Disability Discrimination Act and the actions of many community associations and village halls to meet the requirements of the Act were contributory factors to the high level of applications received. Many of the applications showed that committees were taking the opportunity to use the Disability Discrimination Act to initiate a more general refurbishment of their premises. There were also a considerable number of applications to address health and safety issues.

CAPITAL PROGRAMME ALLOCATION

    The initial allocation was set at £200,000 although this has been enhanced by savings identified elsewhere in the budget in order to meet the high level of applications.

ALLOCATIONS MADE

    Decision Date

    Amount allocated

 

    £

13 May 2004

    60,755

1 July 2004

    42,520

23 July 2004 (Exec member P & R)

    3,500

16 September 2004

    42,149

18 November 2004

    6,033

20 January 2005

    25,452

Awaiting decision in March 2005

    22,648

Reserved for Community Associations linked to Discovery Centre projects or county owned buildings

    50,000

Total for 2004/05

253,057

There are also a number of applications that have been deferred because their full funding package has not been confirmed and the value of these is £53,750.

1. BREAKDOWN OF PROJECTS

    A total of 57 applications have been received.

    44 have been or are being processed. - 39 have been approved for funding and 5 are awaiting approval.

    A further 7 applications were deferred pending further information on additional funding from other sources.

    1 application was cancelled by the applicant after approval.

    1 application was eligible, but was deferred as Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council were proposing a 75% subsidy which if granted would be sufficient funding for the project to proceed without our assistance.

    1 application was not recommended for support due to questions over the status of the management committee.

    2 applications were not recommended as no application had been made to their District or Parish authority for matched funding under our criteria for projects over £15k.

    1 application was refused as work had already started on the project before receipt of the application.

    The projects that received funding fall into the following categories:

    Priority

    Type of project

    No of applications

    Total funds allocated

         

    £

    1

    Health & Safety

    12

    42,471

    2

    Disability Discrimination Act related

    17

    108,302

    3

    Phased Development

    4

    13,195

    4

    General refurbishment and extensions

    11

    43,589

Includes applications to be considered in March

The projects already supported were in the following district areas:

      District Authority

    No of projects

    Total funds allocated

    District funds matched*

       

    £

    £

    Basingstoke & Deane

    3

    16,567

    150,000

    (Sect 106)

    Eastleigh

    2

    1,909

    2,000

    East Hampshire

    5

    31,280

    5,600

    Fareham

    3

    9,506

    1,433

    Havant

    1

    1,833

    500

    Hart

    2

    14,600

    5,000

    New Forest

    5

    13,724

    7,025

    Test Valley

    10

    53,200

    45,616

    Winchester

    9

    37,790

    44,177

      *Known contributions - does not include unknown grants for smaller projects

2. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

    2.1. 21 User Satisfaction Survey forms were received following completed projects. All forms expressed satisfaction with the funding scheme. Comments received included:

    _ I was very impressed by the whole process and the cheque was very prompt once I submitted invoices

    _ We have found advice & assistance to be met, helpful, attentive & efficient. Many thanks for your help.

    _ Thank you for your support - this support was greatly appreciated and will be fully publicised

    _ We appreciated the services of Mr Dick Whittington in responding to our emails speedily when we informed him of unavoidable delay

    _ Your team has been professional and friendly and it has been a pleasure dealing with you on this matter - overall from beginning to end the service has been really excellent. I found both written and verbal advice given was very helpful

    _ The whole process was relatively straightforward & easy to use and understand

    6.2 Following consultation on a corporate funding strategy the application system has been updated to include corporate requirements whilst taking into consideration user feedback on the existing format. This new format is now in use and a copy of the new application form and guidance documents are attached to this report at Appendix A.