|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
L8 recommends for each building where there may be the risk of legionella that: a) the Duty Holder completes an assessment (or has this done on their behalf) to determine whether there is a risk of exposure to legionella in the building; b) where such a risk is deemed to exist, the Duty Holder shall appoint a Responsible Person(s) to properly manage that risk so as to minimise the risk to the building users; c) the Responsible Person(s) are to set down a written scheme of work designed to minimise the risk and shall ensure those persons who are to follow the written scheme are properly trained to do so; d) records are to be kept of the regime arising from the written scheme of work.
|
2.3 |
The policy of the County Council is to eliminate, where possible, the sources of legionella, but where this is not practical to limit the risk of exposure to the bacteria by ensuring the correct management of the risk. |
2.4 |
As reported to the Panel on 19 October 2004, detection of legionella is currently ranked seventh in the Property Services Strategic Risk Register for 2004/5 with a green performance rating. |
3 |
Definitions |
3.1 |
For the purposes of L8, the Duty Holder is normally the owner of the building or that person who has the Landlord function. In respect of the County Council this is the Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services (PBRS). |
3.2 |
In most circumstances there are two Responsible Persons, one representing the Landlord (ie PBRS) and one the building user. The building user's nominated Responsible Person will typically be the Head Teacher in the case of a school, a Service Manger or Building Manager. It is this named person who is responsible for ensuring the written scheme is adhered to and full and proper records are kept of the execution of the written scheme. |
3.3 |
The Written Scheme will detail all of the tasks that need to be undertaken, by whom and their frequency in order to comply with the recommendations of L8. It also details what records are to be kept, their form and for what duration. |
4 |
The Strategy for Minimising the Risk of Exposure to Legionella |
4.1 |
With an estate comprising several thousands of buildings, most of which have water services of some description, it would not be feasible to undertake Legionella risk assessments of all of the building stock simultaneously. |
4.2 |
In order that resources are targeted at the highest risk sectors, the buildings in the Council's Estate have been assessed and categorised to enable those presenting the highest risk from Legionella to be addressed first. The assessment was made based on the following factors: · plant where there was a risk of disseminating aerosol droplets over a wide geographical area, eg cooling towers · buildings where there were vulnerable people, eg the elderly and infirm or those with respiratory conditions. |
4.3 |
Using these criteria the order of risk was established for generic building types and three groups were established - High Risk, Medium Risk and Low Risk. The table below represents the types of building and their generic risk classification: |
| |
|
| |
|
High Risk Buildings with Cooling Towers Older Persons Residential Homes Day Centres ( all types) Special Schools Medium Risk Children's Homes Family Centres Early Years and Pre-school groups Outdoor Activity Centres Sports Centres & Pools Offices with Shower Facilities Low Risk Secondary Schools Primary Schools Youth Centres Libraries Community Centres & Village Halls Museums & Art Centres Magistrates & other Courts Farms Office Accommodation Highway & Transport Depots Private Dwelling eg Caretakers houses |
|
|
5 |
Managing the Risk |
5.1 |
Management of the risk is driven by the categorisation above. This acknowledges that, whilst the vast majority of the people using schools, libraries, museums and offices are not a high risk group of the population, there are a significant number who, because of their age or state of health, are more susceptible to the risk due to the exposure of Legionella bacteria. Recognising this, the County Council has concentrated its resources on addressing the issues in the High Risk category. |
5.2 5.2.1 |
Domestic Water Systems It is not possible to eliminate totally the risk due to the Legionella bacteria, and it is therefore vital that the management regime is clearly documented and properly carried out. |
5.2.2 |
Key to this in domestic water systems is regular flushing and it is important that the building users are properly trained and instructed in this task. `Facilities Managers' are currently being identified for each building. Their responsibilities will be to undertake key tasks, including the management of the Legionella control regimes. These `Facilities Managers are the named Responsible Persons in the context of L8. |
5.2.3 |
In addition, the Term Engineering Maintenance Contractors carry out regular servicing and maintenance of plant and equipment including the inspection of water storage tanks and hot water calorifiers. |
5.3 5.3.1 |
Cooling Towers It is possible to eliminate the risk from cooling towers by replacing the `wet' towers with `dry coolers' which do not rely on the evaporation of water to reject waste heat. |
5.3.2 |
The Buildings, Land and Procurement Panel previously agreed to the replacement of the three remaining `wet' towers, subject to technical reviews. Two of the replacement schemes (Three Minsters House, Winchester and the Laboratory, Southsea) were to be funded through Policy and Resources Capital Repairs. The system at the Winchester Law Courts was to be funded by the Department for Constitutional Affairs. |
5.3.3 |
Currently only the replacement of the tower in Three Minsters House will proceed. The proposed works outlined for the Hampshire Scientific Services building in Southsea is on hold whilst the long term future of the building is decided. To date, funding has not been made available from the DCA to fund the Winchester Law Courts tower replacement and this scheme too is held in abeyance. |
5.3.4 |
In view of this, these `wet' towers will be recommissioned and run for a further season with robust management regimes in place to ensure they operate in line with the Best Practice Guidance set down in L8. |
6 |
Testing for the Presence of Legionella |
6.1 |
There is no legal requirement for the Legionella testing to be undertaken, but recognising the vulnerability of the residents in our care homes, Hampshire Scientific Services undertake regular testing of the water in the domestic hot and cold water systems in each of the 26 homes. Hampshire Scientific Services also monitor the condition of the water in the three cooling towers operated by Property Services to ensure the water treatment regimes are effective. |
| |
|
6.2 |
The test results for the residential care homes shows that the majority of the homes in the county have no detectable Legionella in their water systems. Unfortunately, there are a number where Legionella bacteria are detected. These currently number 9 in total, but analysis of the figures shows a steady decline in both the numbers of locations in each home (where there has been a detection) and of the level of bacteria detected in the samples. |
| |
|
6.3 |
The reduction is the result of the work undertaken to improve the operation of the plant and equipment as well as a more rigorous flushing regime operated by the building users. |
6.4 |
Testing of the cooling tower water has shown that, with the exception of a single low level detection in one of the towers in September 2004, all of the samples have proved negative for the presence of Legionella bacteria for a number of years. |
| |
|
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.
2 Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act