Archived decisions

    Hampshire County Council

    Executive Member - Environment: South Hampshire and Resource Management

    14 June 2005

    Project Integra: Behavioural Change Strategy

    Report of the Director of Environment

     

    Contact: Adrian Lee, ext 7004 email: [email protected]

    1. Introduction

    1.1 The collection and processing infrastructure is now in place for the County Council to achieve a recycling target of 40%. What is now needed is to encourage behavioural change amongst residents to increase the range and frequency of recycling at the kerbside. If all areas could achieve current best practice in the county the diversion of waste to recycling in kerbside collections could be doubled. In order to help achieve this, Project Integra partners have embarked upon a Behavioural Change Strategy which is partly funded by the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP). Part of the strategy involves direct face to face contact with residents - `doorstepping' to advise them what materials can be recycled and how they can recycle them.

    2. Contract Description

    2.1 The County Council invited expressions of interest from suitably qualified and experienced candidates who wished to be considered for inclusion on a select tender list of Consultants to undertake communications delivery activities for Project Integra's Behavioural Change Strategy. The contract includes two key elements, the doorstepping programme (including monitoring) and training for collection crew and support staff.

    2.2 The contract has been developed as a framework contract to enable the delivery of the WRAP funded elements of the Behavioural Change Strategy which have to be delivered by March 2006. However, the framework process enables flexibility and will enable the Behavioural Change Strategy to be developed on a longer term basis. In order to allow for this long term development, the contract will be for one year (until March 2006) with the option to extend for a further two years, if funding can be identified.

    2.3 The overall value of the work in 2005/06 is up to £500,000, although the contract will be divided into smaller contracts on a call-off basis under the doorstepping and training elements. The first of those contracts are for doorstepping in Basingstoke, Rushmoor, Havant, Portsmouth, Southampton and New Forest.

        Doorstepping Programme

    2.4 A major element of the Behavioural Change Strategy is the delivery of communication activities in a number of target areas, with funding from WRAP to carry the County Council's doorstepping activities to 10% of Project Integra households (ie approximately 60,000 households).

    2.5 A team of Recycling Advisers, recruited from the local area, will be knocking on doors to speak to local residents to find out how to make the most effective use of their kerbside recycling container and encourage more people to recycle more materials, more frequently.

    2.6 Six pilot areas have been selected in areas where there is the greatest potential to increase the recycling rate. The pilot areas are in the following local authority areas - Rushmoor, Basingstoke, Portsmouth, Havant, Southampton and New Forest - and there are up to 17,000 households in each pilot area.

    2.7 In order to identify which households to target and evaluate the impact of the doorstepping programme, an extensive monitoring programme will be undertaken before and after the doorstepping activity.

    2.8 The monitoring will assess the following:

          (i) participation rates;

          (ii) the range of materials collected for recycling;

          (iii) the extent to which the bin is full; and

          (iv) the presence and type of any contamination.

    2.9 During September and October 2005 the monitoring programme will then be repeated in order to measure the effectiveness of the doorstepping programme and establish whether this method of face to face contact with residents has enabled and encouraged more people to recycle more materials, more frequently.

        Training for Collection Crew and Support Staff

    2.10 To enable collection crews, supervisors and support staff to play key roles in delivering the Behavioural Change Strategy, Project Integra is seeking to appoint a consultant to develop and deliver an ongoing programme of training. The main aims of the training will be to:

          (i) communicate the aims and objectives of the Behavioural Change Strategy;

          (ii) enable all staff to understand the importance of their role in delivering the strategy; and

          (iii) deliver customer focused awareness training.

    2.11 The training will need to be developed in consultation with Project Integra and be tailored for a variety of training needs for telephone support staff, collection crews, other operatives and officers.

      Delivery Timetable

    2.12 The programme will be delivered to the following timetable:

      Monitoring programme

      May-June 2005

      Doorstepping programme

      July-September 2005

      Training for collection crew and support staff

      July-October 2005

      Post monitoring programme

      Mid-September-October 2005

    3. Procurement Process

    3.1 Procurement has followed the appropriate Financial Regulations set out in part 3 (E) and the standing orders for contracts part 3 (F) of the County Council's constitution and has been delivered to the following timetable:

      Advertised in the Official Journal of the European Communities

      21 October 2004

      Expressions of interest shortlisted

      29 November 2004-13 January 2005

      Tender submissions deadline

      24 February 2005

      Tender evaluation

      25 February-4 March 2005

      Consultant interviews

      3-4 March 2005

      Consultants short-listed to be included on a call-off list for doorstepping and a call-off list for training activities.

      4 March 2005

    3.2 Following advertisement, six consultants were invited to tender for the contracts. In response, five consultants tendered for the doorstepping element and five tendered for the training contract.

    3.3 All bids were assessed against price and quality. The quality element considered the consultants previous experience, response to the brief, innovative thinking and general competencies for the task. Details of the assessment framework are included as Appendices 1 and 2. Details of the overall assessment of the doorstepping tender are included in confidential Appendix 3, and is summarised below.

    3.4 Five companies tendered for the doorstepping (and monitoring) element of the project. The assessment of the tenders was based upon quality (40%) and price (60%). It is proposed that the three companies that scored the highest aggregated mark are included on the call-off list for the delivery of the Behavioural Change Strategy doorstepping programme. These are companies A (62), C (69) and E (98) on the attached evaluation sheet. Whilst company D also scored 62 in the aggregated scores for price and quality, this company scored very poorly on the quality element of the evaluation, being 30 points behind the next nearest company (A), and therefore has not been recommended for the call-off list. The company that received the lowest aggregated score was company B (24). Five companies tendered for the training element of the project and the tender assessment was based upon quality only (100%). It is proposed that the three companies which scored the highest mark for quality are included on the call-off list for delivery of the training element of the Behavioural Change Strategy. As shown on the attached evaluation sheet these are companies A (66), C (82) and E (86). The next nearest score was awarded to company B (59).

    3.5 The following consultants were considered to have met the basic requirements for quality and competency and offered best value:

        (i) Business Eco Network

        (ii) Community Recycling Services

        (iii) Environmental Resources Management.

    Recommendation

    That to assist delivery of Project Integra's £1.6 million Behavioural Change Strategy, a framework contract be awarded to Business Eco Network, Community Recycling Services and Environmental Resources Management for expenditure of up to £500,000 for doorstepping and training work over a three year period.

    Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers

     

    The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.

     

    NB the list excludes:

     

    1.

    Published works.

     

    2.

    Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.

    TITLE

    LOCATION

    Project Specification

    Environment Department

    Room 216

    Tender Documents

    Room 216

    397Rpt/AWL

    Appendix 1

               

    Project Integra Behavioural Change Strategy

           

    Tender assessment matrix for doorstepping and participation rate monitoring

           

    The proposal submitted for the tender for the Project Integra Behavioural Change Strategy will be assessed on the basis of quality. In order for the tenderer to submit the highest quality proposal, the following matrix has been provided. Each of the five sub-sections is weighted. The sub-sections also consist of a number of smaller elements which are intended to provide further detailed guidance on what is expected in the proposal.

       
       

    Weighted Score

    Mark awarded

    Weighted Marks

       

    POINTS

               

    1. Interpretation of the brief

    Proposal meets or exceeds the brief requirements in this area

    20

           

    Understanding

    Demonstrates a thorough appreciation of the content, aims and outputs required and makes suggestions for added value.

             

    Innovation

    Goes beyond the brief to suggest innovative, complementary and appropriate activities that could be included.

             

    2. Delivery

     

    45

           

    Community engagement

    Clear proposals for working closely with the local community (e.g. through employment of Recycling Advisors) to engage residents, raise awareness and change behaviour.

             

    Evidence

    Methods proposed have proven success and are accompanied by evidence of their success and examples of previous relevant work using this methodology.

             

    Field operation

    Detailed outline of intended field operation with reference to the methods for checking quality and accuracy of information gathered.

             

    Monitor and review

    Strongly shows importance and method of monitoring, reviewing and reporting with appropriate methodologies given. Demonstrates ability to change programme focus if needed.

             

    3. Programme and timetable

    Proposal meets or exceeds the brief requirements in this area

    10

           

    Programme scope

    Scope of programme activities is logical, timely and linked clearly to reachable targets

             

    Management structure

    Clearly acknowledges the need for contingency measures to enable flexibility of delivery and project completion.

             

    4. Working practices and reporting

     

    15

           

    Adaptability

    Acknowledges the need to be flexible and indicates willingness and ability to adapt the programme in consultation with the client.

             

    Partnership working

    Outlines clear proposals for partnership working, supported by examples of previous, relevant, successful partnership working arrangements.

             

    5. Staff resources and deployment

    Proposal meets or exceeds the brief requirements in this area

    10

           

    Management structure

    Project management team structure is defined clearly and is appropriate. Staff identified have extensive and relevant project management skills

             

    Staff roles and experience

    Project staff have relevant training, experience and qualifications. Senior management have strong track record in delivering similar programmes successfully.

             

    Staff costs

    Staff costs for each are clearly stated, are in line with market rates and appropriate for the programme proposed.

             
     

    Total score

    100

           

    Assess to Standard Table (Doorstepping Programme Tender)

    Assessed Standard

     

    Marks

    Using high standard with no reservations

    High standard

    Good standard: but minor reservations

    Acceptable; but significant reservations

    Not acceptable

     

    10

    9

    7

    4

    0

    Overall Assessment

    60% Price 40% Quality

    Tender

    Aggregate Mark

    A

    62

    B

    24

    C

    69

    D

    62

    E

    98

    Appendix 2

               

    Project Integra Behavioural Change Strategy

         

    Tender assessment matrix for training programme

           
                 

    The proposal submitted for the tender for the Project Integra Behavioural Change Strategy will be assessed on the basis of quality. In order for the tenderer to submit the highest quality proposal, the following matrix has been provided. Each of the six sub-sections is weighted. The sub-sections also consist of a number of smaller elements which are intended to provide further detailed guidance on what is expected in the proposal.

       
       

    Weighted Score

    Mark awarded

    Weighted Marks

       

    POINTS

               

    1. Interpretation of the brief

    Proposal meets or exceeds the brief requirements in this area

    20

           

    Understanding

    Demonstrates a thorough appreciation of the content, aims and outputs required and makes suggestions for added value.

             

    Innovation

    Responds to the brief by suggesting innovative, complementary and appropriate activities that could be included.

             

    2. Delivery

     

    35

           

    Evidence

    Methods proposed have proven success and are accompanied by evidence of their success and examples of previous relevant work using this methodology.

             

    Flexibility

    The programme is flexible with options for delivering the training in-house, off site or at the point of service delivery.

             

    Tailored

    The training programme is clearly tailored, with different approaches identified for different target groups.

             

    Monitor and review

    Identifies methods of monitoring, reviewing and reporting. Demonstrates ability to change programme focus if needed.

             

    3. Programme and timetable

    Proposal meets or exceeds the brief requirements in this area

    10

           

    Programme scope

    Scope of programme activities is logical, timely and linked clearly to reachable targets

             

    Management structure

    Clearly acknowledges the need for contingency measures to enable flexibility of delivery and project completion.

             

    4. Costs

     

    10

           

    Realistic predictions

    The proposal must include detailed and realistic spending predictions that match the programme and include contingency planning

             

    Best Value

    A breakdown of the costs and how the methods/techniques chosen represent best value in comparison to other options.

             

    5. Working practices and reporting

     

    15

           

    Adaptability

    Acknowledges the need to be flexible and indicates willingness and ability to adapt the programme in consultation with the client.

             

    Partnership working

    Outlines clear proposals for partnership working, supported by examples of previous, relevant, successful partnership working arrangements.

             

    6. Staff resources and deployment

    Proposal meets or exceeds the brief requirements in this area

    10

           

    Management structure

    Project management team structure is defined clearly and is appropriate. Staff identified have extensive and relevant project management skills

             

    Staff roles and experience

    Project staff have relevant training, experience and qualifications. Senior management have strong track record in delivering similar programmes successfully.

             

    Staff costs

    Staff costs for each are clearly stated, are in line with market rates and appropriate for the programme proposed.

             
     

    Total score

    100

           

    ASSESSED STANDARD TABLE (TRAINING PROGRAMME TENDER)

    Assessed Standard

     

    Marks

    Using high standard with no reservations

    High standard

    Good standard: but minor reservations

    Acceptable; but significant reservations

    Not acceptable

     

    10

    9

    7

    4

    0

    OVERALL ASSESSMENT

    100% Quality

    1

    2

    Tender

    Quality Mark

       

    A

    66

    B

    59

    C

    82

    D

    53

    E

    86