Archived decisions
Appendix
Annual Efficiency Statement 2004/05 - Efficiency gains backward look
|
Quality Cross Check Met? |
2004/05 annual efficiency gains (£) |
...of which related to capital spend (£) |
...of which related to other spend (£) |
...of which cashable (£) |
Adult social services |
Yes |
688,000 |
|
|
688,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: The service has absorbed increased staff costs arising from increments etc. within existing budgets without detriment to the service. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: Primary Indicator; Number of direct payments per 100,000 population (BV201) Direct Payments C51 2003/04 = 68 2004/05 = 102. This indicator has been chosen as it covers all adult client groups. | |||||
Children's services |
Yes |
493,000 |
|
|
493,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: Initiatives to develop the in-house fostering capacity has increased the number of placements available. This has directly reduced the number of external placements with a consequential reduction in the overall unit costs of fostering. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: Primary Indicator; the percentage of core assessments that were completed within 35 working days (APA SS 11/C64). This indicator has been chosen over those suggested as its strongly regarded BY CSCI as a good measure of both quality and efficiency in relation to vulnerable children. 48.8% (2003/04) and 71.8% in (2004/05). | |||||
Culture and sport |
Yes |
671,000 |
|
|
251,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: The Recreation and Heritage service has absorbed increased costs and re-allocated budgets to achieve service improvements within the same overall cash limit. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: Primary Indicator; Satisfaction of residents: median % net satisfied with 6 'cultural services' (biannual residents survey) including libraries, archives, countryside sites and support for the arts, theatres, music. Secondary indicator: BV170b - visits in person to museums (not scaled to population). 2003/04 = 330,000 visits, 2004/05 = 355,874 visits. | |||||
Secondary indicator: BV170c - school pupil visits to museums. 2003/04 = 29,457, 2004/05 = 331,604. | |||||
Environmental services |
Yes |
426,000 |
|
|
426,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: Historic Buildings - the use of grant funding has been targeted more effectively to maintain the stock on the historic buildings register. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: Primary Indicator: CPA score for the environment block. This indicator was chosen - as it was felt to be more strategic than those suggested.(NB the method of evaluation and the scope of the service block changes for CPA 2005. Therefore the 2003 and 2004 results provided (i.e. 4 in 2003/04 and 4 in 2004/05) are based on the CPA 2002 model. From 2005/06 onwards results will be based on the CPA 2005 model. | |||||
Local transport |
Yes |
4,812,000 |
0 |
0 |
1,589,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: Term maintenance contracts have been procured that provide for price increases at 1% below the increase in RPI. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: Primary indicator: Annual Progress Report Score. 2003/04 = 71% (Dec 2003), 2004/05 = 76% (December 2004) | |||||
Secondary indicator; re: revenue impact of use of developer contributions to finance capital expenditure - condition of classified and unclassified roads: BVPI 97(a and b).2003/04 = 15.52% (BV 97a), 19.52% (BV97b). 2004/05 = 10.5% (BV97a), 8.87% (BV97b). (NB Change of survey methodology between 2003/04 and 2004/05 - hence large apparent improvement. Indicators to be replaced by BV223 and 224 from 2005/06). | |||||
Non-school education services |
Yes |
969,000 |
|
|
818,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: Early Years - additional places have been created without an increase in budget and lower unit costs have been achieved in the provision of training and childminding start up. In addition price inflation has been absorbed and the childminding network has been increased with the same level of grant. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: re: the Primary indicator: The method of evaluation and scope of service block changes for CPA 2005. Therefore 2003 and 2004 results are based on the CPA model for Education Services only. From 2005/06 onwards results will be based on the CPA 2005 model for combined children's services. This is a key performance measure. | |||||
Supporting people |
Yes |
894,000 |
|
|
894,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: A three year programme of service reviews has identified a range of service efficiencies. In addition, contracts with care providers have been negotiated at rates below price inflation. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: Primary indicator - see above - Quality Assessment Framework. NB In 2003/04 only four core objectives formed part of the Quality Assessment Framework. | |||||
Other cross-cutting efficiencies not covered above | |||||
Corporate services |
Yes |
1,856,000 |
|
|
1,856,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: Central departments have made efficiencies in absorbing cost increases, the implementation of new corporate IT systems and reducing the cost of other hardware and software. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: NB Change of model for 2005 will lead to different basis for analysing performance and invalidate trend analysis over the full period. 2003/04 and 2004/05 are based on CPA model 2002. 2005/06 onwards will be based on the CPA model for 2005 | |||||
Procurement |
Yes |
1,060,000 |
|
|
1,060,000 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: Efficiencies have been achieved on a range of major contract procurements including the provision of agency staff, the use of photocopying equipment and on a number of works contracts for redecoration, re-roofing etc. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: Primary indicator above: Data not available until 2005/06, so secondary indicator selected to demonstrate no loss of quality between 2003/04 and 2004/05. | |||||
Productive time |
Yes |
0 |
|
|
0 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: Secondary indicator; re: staffing efficiencies from the absorption of increments - overall employee satisfaction. 2003/04 = 39%. Next survey 2006. | |||||
Transactions |
Yes |
0 |
|
|
0 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: | |||||
Miscellaneous efficiencies |
Yes |
0 |
|
|
0 |
Activities undertaken to achieve efficiency gain: The County Council will be seeking to incorporate further efficiencies relating to Treasury Management and is continuing to research a number of other potential efficiencies, particularly in relation waste management. The statement is also based on the assumption that LEA efficiencies relating to schools are excluded from the AES. | |||||
Quality cross-check notes: | |||||
Total |
|
11,869,000 |
|
|
8,075,000 |