Archived decisions
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL BUILDINGS, LAND AND PROCUREMENT PANEL EXECUTIVE MEMBER - POLICY AND RESOURCES |
ITEM 5 PROJECT APPRAISAL (Externally Funded) |
_____________________________________________
30 JUNE 2005
14 JULY 2005
_____________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
PROJECT: |
BRIGHTON HILL ROUNDABOUT, BASINGSTOKE - SAFETY AND BUS PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS |
__________________________________________________________________
COMMENCEMENT DATE: |
AUGUST 2005 |
COMPLETION DATE: |
DECEMBER 2005 |
PLANNED YEAR OF START IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL PROGRAMME: 2005/06 |
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
7. |
Scheme |
7.1 |
Hampshire County Council, in cooperation with Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, has developed a road improvement scheme for Brighton Hill roundabout with a number of measures to reduce traffic accidents and the provision of a new bus priority lane on the Brighton Way approach. |
7.2 |
Details |
The scheme provides a new 230 metre long lane for buses along Brighton Way, in addition to the existing traffic lanes, as well as minor road widening, repositioning of entry islands and safety improvements to realign the exit from Western Way. Tactile surfaces and a new pedestrian refuge island are to be provided at The Harrow Way entrance to the roundabout and also at the improvements to the existing island at Western Way. This will assist pedestrians and vulnerable users to cross these roads safely. The street lighting is to be upgraded to current standards, together with areas of carriageway reconstruction, new carriageway surfacing and high skid resistant materials on each approach. The lane discipline is to be improved to the circulatory carriageway and approaches, with concentric spiral lane markings with lane destination markings and signing to advise drivers of the appropriate lane to use on their approach and through the junction. The maintenance life of this completed scheme will be from 10-15 years depending on future traffic growth which is in keeping with new build road schemes. The cost benefit analysis of the roundabout improvements are calculated on the basis of the predicted number of accidents saved and the economic cost per accident (Department for Transport - Highways Economics Note No 1 December 2004), against the accident study period and the estimated works costs. This presents a first year rate of return in the range of 52% to 95% on accident prevention works costs of £600,000. This compares to a desired target rate of 100% rate of return for a designated safety scheme. This lower rate of return is a reflection of the estimated cost to undertake the works outside peak traffic periods and overnight. If the works were to be permitted during normal working hours, a first year rate of return in the range of 85% to 153% could be expected. As part of the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of vehicle speeds and flows a series of permanent vehicle count loops are to be built into the scheme. This will assist with measuring the effectiveness of its performance against the objectives - improving safety and reducing accidents. This data will also assist with the overall assessment and analysis of traffic movement around Basingstoke. A location plan is attached. The roundabout improvements and bus lane proposal is illustrated on the scheme plan 17/A30/73/01 rev D, which will be displayed at the meeting. | |
7.3 |
Targets and Outcomes |
The primary need for the scheme is to improve the condition and safety of the road layout at the Brighton Hill roundabout to reduce traffic accidents. The scheme includes a bus lane to improve the reliability and speed of public transport services during peak traffic periods and so encourage the use of better quality bus services as an attractive and accessible alternative to the car. The relevant targets within LTP 1 are: (i) for a 40% reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured and for a 10% reduction in the number of slight casualties per 100 million vehicle kilometres to the average 1994-1998 level by 2010; (ii) to increase bus use from 2000 levels by 10% by 2010; and (iii) to halve the deterioration in the condition of principal roads. This scheme will help towards the achievement of these targets. Similar targets are currently being developed for LTP 2. Brighton Hill roundabout is ninth of the top ten worst sites in Hampshire for personal injury traffic accidents. The three year accident record from January 2001 to December 2003 shows that a total of 27 slight Personal Injury Accidents (PIAs) have occurred at the roundabout. Of these, ten occurred in wet conditions and eight in the dark; ten were recorded on the circulatory carriageway, of which four involved vehicles exiting east to the A30 Winchester Road in conflict with circulating vehicles. Two further PIAs involved vehicles entering the roundabout from Western Way in conflict with circulating vehicles. Fifteen of the PIAs were on the approaches to the roundabout with five at the circulatory carriageway, four at the entries and three from the exits. The proposed safety improvements at the roundabout are estimated to reduce these accidents to between 10 and 19 during the following three year period of investigation following the works. Individual bus delays to the Line One service which caries over 380,000 passengers each year and operates every 10 minutes in peak traffic can be up to 4 minutes per bus in peak traffic conditions at Brighton Way. The provision of a priority bus lane will reduce this delay by some 73 seconds (30%). Line 1 has also seen a 22% increase in bus patronage in the last year and is currently the second highest patronage route in Hampshire. It is considered that the additional benefits of extended maintenance life of the roundabout and the new bus priority lane, which | |
7.4 |
Standards |
The scheme design complies with Department for Transport and Hampshire County Council standards and has been safety audited at the appropriate stages in the design process. | |
7.5 |
Statutory Procedures and Consultation |
The traffic regulation order has been processed and advertised from 23 May 2005 to facilitate the provision of a bus priority lane in Brighton Way. The comments received are attached as Appendix 2 (closure date for responses 13 June 2005). Temporary road closure orders will be arranged to facilitate the various aspects of the proposed works. Regular liaison meetings have been held with Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council during the preparation of the detail design of the project. A public exhibition showing the proposals has been provided at the County Council's South Ham Library and at the reception of Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council offices from 23 May to 10 June 2005. All the comments received are to be addressed where possible. The scheme details have also been shown to the Police and other emergency services. No objections have been received. | |
7.6 |
Policy Considerations The project supports the aims of both the strategic transport policies in the North Hampshire Transport Strategy and the Hampshire Local Transport Plan with emphasis on: (i) reducing dependency on car travel, to slow down the growth in car use; (ii) promoting sustainable alternatives to car travel, in the use of public transport; (iii) improving road safety; (iv) improving the environment, for example air quality, noise and reduced conflict between traffic and people; and (v) strengthening the local economy by maintaining good access and movement. |
7.7 |
Environmental Impacts |
There will be no additional impact to the environment with the completed scheme. The impact from its construction will be limited with the contractor working during the night-time and at off-peak times to avoid peak hour traffic flows. This will reduce the overall time duration of the works and help to minimise the daytime disruption to traffic. | |
7.8 |
Land Requirement |
No land acquisition required. All work to be confined within existing public highway limits. | |
7.9 |
Alternative Arrangements |
The initial feasibility study identified signalisation as an option for Brighton Hill roundabout. Further modelling during the detailed design revealed that signalisation alone at this location had limited benefits in terms of vehicle management or congestion. The geometry and size of the existing roundabout does not support a viable signal improvement scheme without major improvement works which would necessitate a third circulatory lane to keep flows to within current levels. This would cost three times as much as the current scheme which gives proportionately similar benefits. A left turn only was considered to improve the safety from Western Way. Consultation with the Borough Council and local Members showed that local residents were not in favour of this proposal. Western Way has since been redesigned so that the exit onto the roundabout enables drivers to choose either a left turn lane or straight on manoeuvre with offset visibility to improve safety in this area. | |
7.10 |
Local Members' View |
The local Members, Councillors Gurden, Heath and Jo Kelly, support the roundabout proposal in general. Councillor Heath does not support the bus lane as being worthwhile. Councillor Jo Kelly is concerned about the bus priority lane cost benefit. | |
7.11 |
Executive Member's View |
The Executive Member for Environment: North Hampshire and Spatial Strategy recommends the proposal. |
7.12 |
Impact Assessments |
There will be attention to ensuring that all pedestrian crossing areas have a flush access to assist the mobility impaired, together with tactile surfaces for the visually impaired. Promotion of public transport by the construction of the bus priority lane benefits all sections of the community who can use the bus. | |
7.13 |
Crime and Disorder Act 1998 |
The provisions of this Act have no impact on the proposal. | |
7.14 |
Sustainability |
The scheme will assist with the movement of buses along the bus priority lane thus improving the attractiveness of public transport in this area. Where possible excavated materials will be considered for re-use on the site. | |
8. |
Financial Arrangements |
8.1 |
Expenditure |
£ |
Funds Available |
£ | |
Design Fee |
75,000 |
Developer Funding |
1.25m | ||
Supervision |
50,000 |
||||
Project Works |
1.125m |
||||
Land |
0 |
||||
______ |
______ | ||||
Total |
£1.25m |
Total |
£1.25m | ||
______ |
______ | ||||
8.2 |
Revenue Implications |
£ |
% Variation to Committee's budget | ||
Net increase in current expenditure |
22,000 |
0.03 | |||
Capital Charge |
98,000 |
0.08 | |||
______ |
____ | ||||
Total Expenditure |
120,000 |
0.11 | |||
______ |
____ | ||||
* It should be noted that a Section106 developers contribution of £423,000 with interest accrued is conditional upon a scheme spend by 14 May 2006.
8.3 |
Maintenance Implications There will be a net increase in the maintenance implications due to the improvements at Brighton Hill roundabout. This will be taken into account with the setting of the annual maintenance budget. |
Recommendations
1. That the Buildings, Land and Procurement Panel recommends approval of this Project Appraisal to carry out the Brighton Hill Roundabout Improvements, which includes a Traffic Regulation Order for a bus priority lane on Brighton Way, at an estimated cost of £1.25 million.
2. That the Executive Member for Policy and Resources approves this Project Appraisal to carry out the Brighton Hill Roundabout Improvements, which includes a Traffic Regulation Order for a bus priority lane on Brighton Way, at an estimated cost of £1.25 million.
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers | |
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. | |
NB the list excludes: | |
1. |
Published works. |
2. |
Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act. |
TITLE |
LOCATION |
A30 Brighton Hill Roundabout File: PT/10/Bas/57585 Drawing 17/A30/73/01 rev D Hampshire County Council Bus Priority Policy, September 2004 |
Environment Department Environment Department |
269/PST Rpt
APPENDIX 1
BRIGHTON WAY PRIORITY LANE, BASINGSTOKE
Introduction
As part of the Brighton Hill Roundabout Improvements scheme on the A30 south-west corridor the existing scheme proposals include the implementation of a priority lane on the Brighton Way approach to the roundabout junction. This paper outlines the benefits that can be realised by incorporating a priority lane at this junction as part of the overall scheme. This includes a business case based on time savings to bus passengers on the proposed priority lane.
Policy Background
In pursuance of its Local Transport Plan objectives, the County Council is keen to encourage greater use of public transport. In this context, for the bus to become the option of first choice it needs to be considered as a realistic alternative to the car. This applies in particular to its ability to be comparable with the car in terms of the reliability and consistency of journey times.
The second Local Public Service Agreement targets will focus on improving bus patronage on Quality Bus Partnership routes. The forthcoming second Local Transport Plan will also have a mandatory target for improving bus punctuality which must be reported on annually.
One means of influencing bus punctuality is through the introduction of measures to separate the bus from general traffic in congested areas. This can be achieved by giving the bus priority at junctions and/or on main roads. These priority measures can dramatically reduce delays to buses.1
Brighton Way Priority Lane
The proposal for Brighton Way is to include a 230 metre section of priority lane, in addition to the existing two-way carriageway, on the inbound approach to the Brighton Hill Roundabout. Stagecoach Line 1 is the second highest patronage bus service in Hampshire and operates along this route, which is a principal access corridor between Basingstoke town centre and the residential areas in the south-west of Basingstoke. The route operates under a Quality Bus Partnership to which Hampshire County Council, Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council and Stagecoach have all made commitments.
Brighton Way suffers from traffic congestion in the peak hours and at the weekends. Among a number of locations it has been identified by the bus operator as an area where the bus is delayed. The queues occur when high volumes of circulating traffic on Brighton Hill roundabout have priority over vehicles accessing the roundabout from Brighton Way. For this reason the PM peak travel periods often experience the most congestion. The traffic queue approaching the roundabout on Brighton Way usually moves quite quickly but is highly variable in length. This is because breaks in traffic caused by activation of pedestrian crossing phases on the A30, or other delays, can often result in the whole queue being dispersed very quickly. It is the uncertainty as to the delay which presents the greatest problem for programming bus timetables and achieving reliable and punctual services. Observations have shown the delay (over free flow conditions) ranges from zero delay to approaching 4 minutes.
Business Case Working
This business case should be viewed as a guide to the value of the scheme. Some assumptions have to be made and factors which are not quantifiable have to be taken into consideration. For example whilst the present day time saving can be calculated, the impact of journey time reliability problems cannot. That is, the impact of the time when a bus was late on a persons desire to ever use that service again. For these reasons a range of values will be given, and it can be expected that between that range lies the value of the scheme.
In order to assess the lower range of the scheme merits, a pure `time saved under present quantifiable conditions' calculation is used. This looks at a number of factors, which include:
(i) number of passengers benefiting from the time savings;
(ii) time saved by the priority measures and cost of time;
(iii) the existing traffic flows; and
(iv) cost of scheme.
Over 380,000 passengers currently use the Line 1 bus service each year travelling to and from South West Basingstoke to the town centre and beyond. Not all of these will benefit from the bus lane. Presently, only those travelling at peak travel periods will do so. However, the benefit will be felt on the whole route in terms of greater reliability of the service and shorter journey times. Operator experience is that 50% of all journeys by bus are made during the peak travel periods so by having a more reliable service over 190,000 passengers will benefit annually.
In free flow conditions a bus can negotiate the length of the proposed bus lane in 20 seconds. In traffic surveys undertaken this year and late last year, peak hour delays approaching 4 minutes were recorded. The mean delay was 73 seconds over and above the free flow travel time.
The cost of time per hour for bus users has been calculated at a national level by the Department for Transport as £5.14.
This element of the Brighton Hill scheme has been estimated to cost £232,000. This includes an element of the traffic management costs and enhancements to help restrict work to outside peak traffic periods and overnight.
Based in the data above, the saving of 73 seconds to 190,000 passengers would result in a £19,803 annual benefit. This would be the value in year one of the quantifiable elements of the scheme. Therefore the annual benefits would cover the works costs of the scheme after a period of 12 years.
To assess the higher end value of the scheme various other factors have to be taken into account which are not easily quantifiable. These include:
(i) the future value of the scheme, which will be related to increases in traffic flows and levels of bus patronage;
(ii) the impact of more reliable journey times on bus patronage; and
(iii) the added value the scheme will have in conjunction with other time saving or bus reliability initiatives.
In response to investment in Line 1 as part of the QBP by the bus operator Stagecoach and the County, a 22% increase in patronage has occurred in the last year. This has reversed a previous decline is bus use in Basingstoke. It should not at this stage be viewed as a sustainable trend. It is however a positive indication that people in Basingstoke will travel more by bus if the services are improved.
If implemented this scheme would be the first bus priority lane in Basingstoke. On its own it will have some benefit, however in conjunction with other priority schemes significant improvements in bus reliability can be achieved. The benefit of cumulative time savings will add to more than the sum of their parts. This is difficult to quantify, but experience in London and Oxford has shown that over time the successful implementation of bus priority measures has meant that the bus has been able to maintain good reliability in the face of increasing traffic congestion.
Traffic flows on Brighton Hill Roundabout have continued to grow year on year, and will grow further resulting in longer queues at the junction approaches and a lengthening of the peak travel period.
As all of the above are difficult to quantify a value judgment has to be made as to the possible future benefit. The worst delays experienced recently were approaching 4 minutes. As a guide, if the delay were to extend to 4 minutes (on average) on a regular basis this would work out at an annual saving of £64,106. This annual benefit would cover the works costs in under 4 years.
Therefore in looking at both the lower and higher end values of the scheme in terms of time savings, the scheme would have an annual rate of return of between £19,803 and £64,106 per annum.
Other Issues to Consider
Further to the business case, other issues to consider include:
(i) the scheme is to be funded entirely from the Homebase developer contributions;
(ii) the scheme will enhance and support further work on the Line 1 Quality Bus Partnership;
(iii) future LTP targets will include a mandatory bus punctuality indicator;
(iv) road space reallocation is negligible, and the existing two-way highway is maintained for all traffic;
(v) the redesign of the junction will have capacity and safety benefits for other vehicles;
(vi) the priority lane will also permit improved access for emergency vehicles when on emergency calls;
(vii) economies of scale in doing the works at the same time as the roundabout improvements mean that implementing the scheme at a later date would cost between £75K to £80K more; and
(viii) 15% of Basingstoke's population do not have access to a car.
Conclusion
The unpredictable nature of the delays on Brighton Way are responsible for adding delays of up to 4 minutes on scheduled bus services. The priority lane will overcome this reliability issue and benefit the operation of the bus along the whole route. It will also help to achieve the mandatory LTP2 target on improved bus punctuality.
The scheme is funded by developer contributions and in construction cost to time benefit terms would pay for itself within 12 years, but probably far sooner. The scheme will have greater benefit and increasing rates of return as traffic and congestion increases. Through economies of scale it is far more cost effective to introduce the scheme now rather than at some future date.
Patronage is already increasing and priority measures should help reinforce this trend. The scheme builds on the already strong Quality Bus Partnership on this route and will complement further initiatives of our other partners. Further investment from the County in this Quality Bus Partnership will also help to encourage further private investment from the commercial bus operator.
The inclusion of this priority lane poses no disbenefits for the existing users of Brighton Way, but will help to promote the bus as a viable and realistic alternative for those not wishing or able to travel by private car.
APPENDIX 2
Brighton Hill Bus Priority Lane Traffic Regulation Order
Summary of objections received with officer comments.
PST/10/Bas/June05
BUS PRIORITY LANE IN BRIGHTON WAY, BRIGHTON HILL, BASINGSTOKE
Hampshire County Council propose making road traffic regulation order as follows:-
EFFECT OF ORDER: To provide a bus priority lane in Brighton Way, Brighton Hill, Basingstoke as specified in the schedule to this notice.
FURTHER DETAILS: Details of the proposed order, a map and a statement of reasons may be inspected during usual office hours at the following places:
(i) South Ham Library, Paddock Road, South Ham, Basingstoke (Opening hours: Tuesdays 9.30-1 & 2-7, Wednesdays, Fridays 9.30-1 & 2-5, Saturdays 9.30-1)
(ii) Civic Offices, London Road, Basingstoke (Opening hours: Mondays to Thursdays 8.30 - 5; Fridays 8.30 - 4.30)
(iii) County Council Information Centre, Mottisfont Court, High Street, Winchester (Opening hours: Mondays to Fridays 8.30 - 5.30)
OBJECTIONS: Objections and other representations in respect of these proposals must be sent in writing to the undersigned by the 13 June 2005. All objections must state the grounds on which they are made.
TITLE: The order if made will be known as "The Hampshire (Brighton Way, Brighton Hill, Basingstoke) (With Flow Bus Lane) Order 2005"
The Castle J A PATTISON
Winchester Head of Corporate and Legal Services
SO23 8UJ
email: [email protected] fax: 01962 878646
SCHEDULE
Part of road at Brighton Hill in the Borough of Basingstoke and Deane
Bus Lane
Column 1 Part of road |
Column 2 Times of operation |
Column 3 Direction of travel and type of bus lane |
Column 4 Type of permitted vehicle |
That part of the west side of Brighton Way between a point 35 metres south of its junction with Brighton Hill Roundabout and a point 230 metres south of that point with a width of 3.65 metres measured at right angles from the kerb except where tapered at its southern end. |
At all times |
Northbound with-flow lane |
Bus, Pedal Cycle, Taxi |
A595.mb
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984
THE HAMPSHIRE (BRIGHTON WAY, BRIGHTON HILL, BASINGSTOKE)
(WITH FLOW BUS LANE) ORDER 2005
Hampshire County Council in exercise of its powers under Sections 1(1) and (2); 2(1) to (3) and 3(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("the Act"), and of all other enabling powers, and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act, hereby makes the following order:-
1. In this order
a) causing includes permitting;
b) "vehicle" includes part of a vehicle;
c) "bus", "bus lane", "pedal cycle", "taxi" and "with-flow lane" have the same meanings as in the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002.
2. Save as provided in article 3 of this order, no person shall cause any vehicle to be in a bus lane during the times specified in relation to that bus lane in the schedule to this order unless the vehicle is of a type specified, and is proceeding in the direction specified in relation to that bus lane in that schedule.
3. Nothing in article 2 of this order shall render it unlawful to cause any vehicle to be in a bus lane for so long as may be necessary:-
a) for any purpose authorised, or included within any exemption to a restriction or prohibition imposed, by any other order in respect of any part of the same side of road on which that bus lane is situated;
b) to enable that vehicle to cross that bus lane while proceeding to or from any road or premises adjacent to the bus lane;
c) to avoid an accident;
d) to allow a person to get or give help in consequence of an accident or emergency or otherwise take action for public safety;
e) to comply with any requirement resulting from works or an emergency in any part of the road adjoining the bus lane;
f) to comply with any direction or permission given by a police constable in uniform or a traffic warden; or
g) to enable the vehicle to be used for police, ambulance or fire and rescue service purposes in response to an emergency call.
4. This order shall come into operation on the 2005 and may be cited as "The Hampshire (Brighton Way, Brighton Hill, Basingstoke) (With Flow Bus Lane) Order 2005".
GIVEN this day of 2005
THE COMMON SEAL of HAMPSHIRE )
COUNTY COUNCIL was hereunto )
affixed in the presence of:- )
Authorised Signatory
SCHEDULE
Part of road at Brighton Hill in the Borough of Basingstoke and Deane
Bus Lane
Column 1 Part of road |
Column 2 Times of operation |
Column 3 Direction of travel and type of bus lane |
Column 4 Type of permitted vehicle |
That part of the west side of Brighton Way between a point 35 metres south of its junction with Brighton Hill Roundabout and a point 230 metres south of that point with a width of 3.65 metres measured at right angles from the kerb except where tapered at its southern end. |
At all times |
Northbound with-flow lane |
Bus, Pedal Cycle, Taxi |
A595.mb
STATEMENT OF REASONS
The Hampshire (Brighton Way, Brighton Hill, Basingstoke) (With Flow Bus Lane) Order 2005
The order is proposed to assist the passage and reduce delay to buses, pedal cycles and taxis.
A595.mb
THE HAMPSHIRE (BRIGHTON WAY, BRIGHTON HILL, BASINGSTOKE)
(WITH FLOW BUS LANE) ORDER 2005
On Hampshire County Council made a road traffic regulation order as follows:-
EFFECT OF ORDER: To provide a bus priority lane in Brighton Way, Brighton Hill, Basingstoke as specified in the schedule to this notice.
DATE OF OPERATION: The order will come into operation on
FURTHER DETAILS: A copy of this notice, the order as made, a map showing the location and effect of the order and a statement of reasons may be inspected during the usual office hours at the following places:-
(i) South Ham Library, Paddock Road, South Ham, Basingstoke (Opening hours: Tuesdays 9.30-1 & 2-7, Wednesdays, Fridays 9.30-1 & 2-5; Saturdays 9.30-1)
(ii) Civic Offices, London Road, Basingstoke (Opening hours: Mondays to Thursdays 8.30 - 5; Friday 8.30 - 4.30)
(iii) County Council Information Centre, Mottisfont Court, High Street, Winchester (Opening hours: Mondays to Fridays 8.30 - 5.30)
APPLICATION TO THE HIGH COURT: Any person who desires to question the validity of the order or of any provision contained in the order on the grounds that it is not within the powers of Sections 1, 2 and 3 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, or on the grounds that any requirement of those Sections or of Parts I, II, or III of Schedule 9 to the Act or any regulations made under the said Part III of Schedule 9 have not been complied with in relation to the order may, by make application for the purpose to the High Court.
The Castle, J. A. PATTISON
Winchester Head of Corporate and Legal Services
SO23 8UJ
SCHEDULE
Part of road at Brighton Hill in the Borough of Basingstoke and Deane
Bus Lane
Column 1 Part of road |
Column 2 Times of operation |
Column 3 Direction of travel and type of bus lane |
Column 4 Type of permitted vehicle |
That part of the west side of Brighton Way between a point 35 metres south of its junction with Brighton Hill Roundabout and a point 230 metres south of that point with a width of 3.65 metres measured at right angles from the kerb except where tapered at its southern end. |
At all times |
Northbound with-flow lane |
Bus, Pedal Cycle, Taxi |
A595.mb