Archived decisions

Hampshire County Council

Regulatory Committee

13 February 2006

Applicant: Hampshire County Council

Extension to Farmhouse on the Mattingley Farms Estate, Including Demolition of Single Storey Lean-To, at Hazeley Farm, Hazeley Heath, Hartley Wintney
(Application No. 05/02647/CMA)
(County Council Ref. No. HRG001)

Report of the Chief Planning Adviser to the Regulatory Committee

Item 9

Contact: Katie Snell, ext 5938 email: [email protected]

1. Summary

1.1 This application proposes to demolish an existing lean-to and erect a two-storey extension on the southern aspect of Hazeley Farmhouse to provide accessible amenities for a child with special needs. Concerns by local residents have been raised over loss of privacy, light and the visual impact of the development. The design of the extension is considered to be sympathetic to the neighbouring historic building and overall street scene and conditions are proposed to secure privacy for the neighbouring properties. It is therefore recommended to grant planning permission, subject to conditions.

2. Site and Proposal

2.1 Hazeley Farm forms part of the Mattingley Farms estate which has been in the ownership of Hampshire County Council since 1919. The Farm is situated in the settlement of Hazeley Heath near Hartley Wintney.

2.2 The farmhouse is set back from the road and is flanked by two properties: Yew Tree Cottage, to the south-east, is a Grade 2 Listed Building and is some 5.5 metres from the proposed development and Westleigh, to the north-west.

2.3 The current tenant farmers have a child with special needs. Currently the ground floor is on several levels with no easy access to the upper floor for a child in a wheelchair. The existing ground floor toilet is in the lean-to and can only be accessed from outside. The proposal is to provide a shower room and WC at ground floor with a lift to a new bedroom at first floor with an en-suite toilet. Minor works to give level access throughout the ground floor and to alter window heights on the west elevation will also take place. An internal wall will be removed to improve access and a pair

      of patio doors installed leading onto a level deck. The overall form and materials of the extension have been designed to match the existing building and to be in keeping with the street scene.

3. Development Plan

3.1 Hart District Local Plan (Replacement) 1996-2006 shows this site to be within the settlement boundary. This proposal accords with policy GEN1 (General Policy for Development and Change of Use).

4. Consultations

4.1 Hart District Council raises no objection subject to conditions of design and amenity protection.

4.2 Mattingley Parish Council raises objection on the grounds of loss of privacy for the neighbouring property and detriment to the character of the listed building.

4.3 The local Member, Councillor Simpson, has no comment.

5. Representations

5.1 One letter has been received from the resident at Yew Tree Cottage expressing concerns over loss of light, change of street scene and loss of privacy.

6. Chief Planning Adviser's Comments

6.1 The views of Mattingley Parish Council, and the neighbour raising concerns that the development will affect the character of the `listed' Yew Tree Cottage are noted, but the materials and design of the extension are sympathetic to the immediate surroundings and will not have a detrimental impact.

6.2 Concerns over privacy have been addressed in the design of the proposal and conditions can be attached to ensure that overlooking is avoided. The existing one-storey lean-to has a window facing the neighbouring property. The proposed extension will not include any first-floor windows on this elevation to ensure that the current level of privacy afforded to the neighbour will not compromised.

6.3 The concerns that Yew Tree Cottage will suffer a loss of light as a result of the increased height of the proposed extension are considered to be unfounded. An analysis of light levels shows that the aspect of Yew Tree Cottage that faces the proposed extension is to the north-north-west and is on the shadier side of the building so there is not an issue of loss of sunlight. Yew Tree Cottage and the proposed extension is set further forward than Hazeley Farm House, therefore the ground floor window of the cottage would not be affected. Finally, the recognised 45 degree rule, as illustrated on the attached plan, indicates that there should not be any loss of light to the two first-floor windows in Yew Tree Cottage.

6.4 In conclusion, it is considered that the proposal represents an acceptable solution for meeting the special needs of a member of the family employed to run the Farm Estate in an environmentally sensitive location. It is considered that the development will not result, in planning terms, in loss of amenity for the neighbouring properties and that planning permission should be granted, subject to conditions.

Recommendation

That planning permission in respect of extension to farmhouse at Hazeley Farm on the Mattingley Farms Estate, including demolition of single storey lean-to at Hazeley Farm, Hazeley Heath, Hartley Wintney (05/02647/CMA) be granted for the following reason, subject to the following conditions:

      Reason for Approval

      It is considered that the proposal would be in accordance with the development plan (summary attached) and would not materially harm the character of the area or the amenity of local residents and would be acceptable in terms of highway safety and convenience.

      Conditions

      Time Limits

        (1) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date on which this planning permission was granted.

              Reason: To comply with Section 91(as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

      Hours of Working

        (2) No work relating to the construction of the development approved, including works of preparation prior to operations, the delivery of construction materials, skips or machinery, nor the removal of waste materials, shall take place before 0800 or after 1800 hours Monday to Friday inclusive, before 0800 or after 1400 hours on Saturday and not at all on Sunday or recognised public holidays, unless otherwise agreed beforehand in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

              Reason: To protect the amenities of occupiers of nearby properties.

      Materials

        (3) The external materials to be used shall match as closely as possible in type, colour and texture to those on the existing building.

        Reason: To secure a satisfactory development.

        (4) The window in the new ground floor shower room and first floor W C shall be glazed with obscure glass only and retained as such.

        Reason: To prevent overlooking of adjoining properties.

        (5) Any development carried out under this permission shall only be done in accordance with the approved plans and details submitted or those subsequently approved under planning conditions forming part of this permission. There shall be no windows constructed in the south elevation at first-floor level.

        Reason: To protect the amenities of neighbouring residents.

Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background papers

The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.

NB the list excludes:

1.

Published works.

2.

Documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.

TITLE

LOCATION

Applicant: Hampshire County Council

Extension to farmhouse on the Mattingley Farms Estate, including demolition of single storey lean-to, at Hazeley Farm, Hazeley Heath, Hartley Wintney
(Application No. 05/02647/CMA) (County Council Ref No. HRG001)

Environment Department

833/KS

Annexe to Reason for Conditions

(as required by Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning

(General Procedure) Order 1995 - as amended)

__________________________________________________________________

Hart District Local Plan (Replacement) 1996-2006

General Policy for Development and Change of Use

GEN1

Proposals for development which accord with other proposals of this plan will be permitted where they:

    (i) are in keeping with the local character by virtue of their scale, design, massing, height, prominence, materials, layout, landscaping, siting and density.