Archived decisions
AT A MEETING of the ENVIRONMENT POLICY REVIEW COMMITTEE held at The Castle, Winchester on Thursday 25 May 2006.
PRESENT:
p Councillor P. R. C. Hutcheson (Chairman) | |
p Councillor Mrs. P. M. Devereux (Vice-Chairman) | |
Councillors: |
|
p J. V. Bryant |
p G. M. Hockley |
p Mrs E. M. Byrom |
p Keith House |
a A. S. Carew |
p R. C. McIntosh |
p N. R. Clarke |
p Sam Payne |
p M. G. Cooper |
a David Simpson |
p A. Edwards |
p Seán D.T. Woodward, |
p Mrs. K. Heron |
|
Also in attendance: Councillors J. K. Glen, T. G. Knight and J. K. West.
Councillor Jackie Porter for Item 111.
106. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
Apologies for absence were received from Councillors A. Carew and
David Simpson.
107. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Members were mindful that, where they believed they had a personal or personal prejudicial interest in any matter to be considered at the meeting, they should normally at the time of the debate declare their interest, and having regard to the circumstances described in paragraphs 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the County Council's Code of Conduct, consider whether to leave the meeting whilst the matter was discussed.
108. MINUTES
The Minutes of the meeting held on 20 April 2006 were confirmed by the Committee and signed by the Chairman.
Arising thereon:
Minute 105 - Environment Policy Review Committee - Forward Plan
The Director of Environment advised Members that the Environment Agency had been invited to the June meeting but to date no response had been received.
109. CHAIRMAN'S COMMUNICATIONS
Reported that Angela Koenig the Highway Agency's Area Performance Manager had accepted an invitation to attend the Environment Policy Review Committee's meeting on 25 July 2006 and all Members of the County Council would be invited to attend for this item. It was proposed that the item will be in two parts; the first, will be a presentation on the issues affecting Hampshire's Motorway and Trunk Road Network and the second part concentrating on strategic questions relating to the Motorway and Trunk Road network raised by Members. To enable best use to be made of the Highway Agency's time, it will be helpful if Members could submit questions to Colin Taylor, Chief Engineer, Hampshire Highways East at [email protected] by 30 June 2006. The intention is to provide a written answer to all questions raised but to select a sample of the more strategic questions to which the Highway Agency will respond at the meeting.
110. MEMBERS' QUESTIONS
No questions to the Executive Member for Environment : North Hampshire
and Spatial Strategy and the Executive Member for Environment :
South Hampshire and Resource Management had been received.
111. PASSENGER TRANSPORT BUDGET STRATEGY
The Committee received a presentation by the Head of Passenger Transport.
He highlighted key facts and figures relating to the decline in bus patronage
and the growth in car use nationally and in Hampshire. He reminded Members
of the commercial context in which bus services are provided and Local
Authorities restricted role in being able to determine the pattern of services.
The presentation focused on measures proposed to contain cost pressures
whilst maximising the extent to which access to services can be maintained.
Members noted that a series of District-based reviews, engaging with partners
and stakeholders were being carried out to achieve this and timetabled to
provide options for the 3 yearly re tendering exercise. Each option would be
assessed against its ability to provide access to facilities as outlined in the
Local Transport Plan regarding retail, health, leisure, work and education.
The presentation also introduced the possibility of introducing a new
mechanism for the assessment and monitoring of future bus subsidy support.
The presentation touched on two other key initiatives. A review of the
existing commercial taxi service in relation to home to school and social care
would assess the existing procurement practice, give a thorough understanding
of the supply market and should provide an enhanced service with greater
value for money and improve efficiency.
A review of Transport in the Community had been agreed as an additional area
for action in response to Member concerns raised at County Council and an
initial meeting had been held with the Chairman and that Member to scope
what the review might cover. Members would be involved in the work as it
progressed.
Members considered whether Hampshire County Council should purchase its
own fleet of vehicles to provide for its own service journeys and non
commercial services. . The Director of Environment advised that although
some Local Authorities provided this service it was not always successful or
cheaper than commercial operators.
It was noted that the reviews would look at service provision for all members
of the community and not just focus on older and disabled people. The Director
of Environment reported that Local Authorities had a statutory duty under the
Transport Act 2000 to consider the elderly and disabled in its decisions about
subsidised passenger transport services.
RESOLVED:
That the report having been presented, Members offered comments which were
noted by the Executive Member for Environment : South Hampshire and
Resource Management.
112. ENVIRONMENT POLICY REVIEW COMMITTEE -
FORWARD PLAN
The Committee received and noted a report of the Chief Executive and
Director of Environment (Item 8 in the Minute Book), as amended setting out
issues for future consideration.
The Chairman reported that with the agreement of County Council at its
meeting on 11 May 2006 to the revised Terms of Reference for the
Environment Policy Review Committee and the intention to construct a
prioritised programme of Task and Finish Thematic Reviews it will be
important to have at least a few such review topics ready to get going for the
autumn. In order to do the preparatory work for this there is a need to identify
any potential topics for possible thematic reviews in the autumn to spring
period. As already mentioned further work is being undertaken on possible
options with regard to Transport in the Community and any outcomes requiring
a Thematic Review role from Members in this area will be fed into the process.
Any other issues that Members can suggest as priorities are welcomed. Where
Members have ideas they will need to contact Share D'All so that she can
explore and understand the topic. Members will be needed who can take a lead
in working on the potential scope.