Archived decisions
Appendix 5
SACRE Development Plan
This SACRE development plan is based upon the SACRE self evaluation carried out in 2004-5. The main points below represent priorities identified for SACRE to effectively carry out its responsibilities in relation to monitoring and providing support for religious education and collective worship and addressing the broader agenda of inclusion and diversity.
1. Action Plan for the development of religious education based on the effective implementation of the agreed syllabus, Living Difference
Timescale: Phase 1 September 2004-April 2006
Evidence:
Set up County development groups to produce units of work for the handbook
Set up regional development groups to redraft planning to the requirements of the agreed syllabus
Publish Handbook
Status: completion April 2006
Timescale: Phase 2 April 2006 ongoing
Evidence:
Set up County Steering Groups (one primary, one secondary) to lead further development
Set up new regional development groups to extend development across the county
Status: initiated December 2005
Financial implications: LA to pay for steering groups; schools to pay for regional development group status
2. Evaluation of the implementation of the agreed syllabus, Living Difference
Timescale: completion by January 2007
Evidence:
Questionnaire to schools (Spring Term 2007)
Steering groups feedback (Autumn Term 2006)
Regional development groups survey (Autumn Term 2006)
Inspectors reports (ongoing scrutiny)
Ofsted reports (ongoing scrutiny)
Status: initiated
Financial implications: LA to pay for questionnaire
3. SACRE monitoring of religious education through school self evaluation of provision.
Timescale: first reports on self evaluation to be scrutinised by SACRE in the Summer Term 2006, then ongoing
Evidence: collection of ongoing self evaluation submissions from schools for SACRE scrutiny to be organised and supported by RE inspectors
Status: to be initiated in January 2006
Financial implications: none
4. Monitoring of and support for secondary schools failing to meet statutory requirements for RE and collective worship
Timescale: ongoing from Autumn Term 2006
Evidence:
Systematic recognition of secondary schools not meeting statutory requirements through questionnaire to schools in relation to the implementation of Living Difference (Spring 2007)
Letter to schools offering inspector support (Autumn 2006)
Ongoing monitoring through SACRE scrutiny of departmental self-evaluation
Link to partnership with local providers of NQTs (established)
Status: to be initiated in Summer Term 2006
Financial implications: none
5. Establishing of a young people's inter-faith forum
Timescale: January 2006, ongoing monitoring with evaluation of effectiveness in 2009
Evidence:
Planning through steering group from January 2006
Establish partnership with University of Winchester by March 2006
Bid to NASACRE for initial funding in March 2006
Forum established by March/April 2006
Status: research undertaken and planning initiated, coordinator to be appointed, forum to be formed by March/April 2006
Financial implications: £50,000 over 5 years
6. Development of links with key stakeholders
Timescale: Spring Term 2006, ongoing
Evidence:
One meeting per year to be held at a religious or educational venue, beginning with the Medina Mosque, Southampton in Summer Term 2006
Speakers to address SACRE on their faith community, beginning with the Muslim community in Southampton in Summer Term 2006
Speakers to address SACRE on RE in their school and the effectiveness of using the Agreed Syllabus, Living Difference, beginning with Key Stage 1 and 2 teachers in Spring Term 2006
SACRE to establish a closer relationship with Southampton Council of Faiths
Status: initiated
Financial implications: none
7. Induction of new SACRE members
Timescale: Autumn 2005, ongoing
Evidence:
New members sent introductory pack by clerk to SACRE (from Autumn 2005)
SACRE delegate gives new members induction (from Autumn 2005)
New members supported at first meeting by experienced SACRE member
(from Autumn 2005)
Status: initiated, ongoing monitoring
Financial implications: none