Archived decisions
Hampshire Fire and Rescue Authority Human Resources Committee Item 6 1 December 2006 Cessation of Day-Crewing Duty System: Transitional Allowances to Staff Report by the Chief Officer |
Contact: Tom Carr - Project Manager - Duty Systems Implementation Tel: 02380 644000 Email : [email protected] |
6 |
Risk analysis |
6.1 |
Achievement of the Authority's corporate aims and objectives can only be successfully achieved with the full engagement and cooperation of all staff. In managing this particular objective, it is therefore important that the Authority has in place appropriate transitional arrangements so that the change can be delivered smoothly, cost-effectively and on time. |
7 |
Resource Implications |
7.1 |
Human Resources |
Processing these allowances will impact upon the Human Resource Department and this has been identified within the Department's work plan and can be undertaken within existing resources. | |
7.2 |
Physical Resources |
There are no physical resource implications as a result of this proposal. | |
7.3 |
Information and Communications Technology Resources |
There are no ICT implications as a result of this proposal. | |
7.4 |
Financial Implications |
If all Service tenants currently occupying Authority-owned houses exercised the option to purchase them at a discount, it is estimated that this would reduce eventual capital receipts by a maximum of £230,000. However, it is unlikely that all tenants would pursue this option. It is also important to emphasise that the estimated reduction is based on assumed values - these may vary by more than 5% when current market values are determined during disposal. | |
The estimated total cost of making payments under the proposed transitional allowances, including the costs of implementing the existing relocation policy to all eligible staff, is put at £340,000. | |
The financial implications of this proposal would add to the costs of implementing the approved IRMP objectives. This would therefore need to be addressed as growth within the budget strategy for 2007/08 & 2008/09. However, it is appropriate to emphasise that, in overall terms, the various IRMP objectives will deliver both service delivery and cash efficiency improvements. | |
8 |
Equality Impact Assessment |
8.1 |
The proposals for allowances set out in this report have been developed on the need to achieve transitional arrangements that are fair and equitable to all the staff affected by the cessation of the day-crewing system. |
8.2 |
The proposals within this report are considered compatible with the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Human Rights Act 1998, and the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. |
9 |
Consultation |
9.1 |
During consultation on the housing disposal policy, the inequity of the overall financial support for staff currently providing their own accommodation, was raised. |
9.2 |
The transitional allowances proposed in this report were then subject to a consultation exercise undertaken from 15 May to 13 July. This included a face to face meeting with all staff affected and representatives of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU). The FBU requested a further meeting as part of the consultation process and the consultation period was extended to facilitate this. The six key points raised during the consultation are set out in Appendix 1. |
10.3 |
During the consultation process, the Fire Brigades Union offered an alternative proposal based on a formula, which calculated the total value of housing stock divided by number of houses with all Day Crewing staff then being paid 10% of the total sum. This alternative was rejected by the Project Board on the basis that it would increase the financial implications by approximately £212,000. The Board was also advised by the Service's Equality Adviser that treating everyone in the same way, as this proposal would do, is not treating everyone equitably. In contrast, the Project Board's proposal aims to recognise the differing circumstances of individuals and seek to achieve an equitable outcome. |
11 |
Conclusion |
11.1 |
The proposed allowances being presented to the Human Resources Committee summarised in this report seek to provide equitable treatment for all staff currently appointed to the day crewing duty system that should help to ensure that the transition to shift crewing at Andover, Havant and Winchester can be implemented smoothly. |
Background Information (Section 100D of Local Government Act 1972) | |
The following documents disclose the facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and has been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of the report: Housing disposal policy - report approved by the Authority at its meeting on 15 February 2006 /decisions/decisions-docs/060215-fireau-R0208134735 The Authority's Integrated Risk Management plan 2006-2009 http://www.hantsfire.gov.uk/irmp Note: The list excludes: (1) published works; and (2) documents that disclose exempt or confidential information defined in the Act. | |
S/WP/C/H/HFRA HR Committee 1 12 06 Transitional Allowance
3 November 2006
Appendix 1
Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service
Day Crew Transitional Allowance - Consultation
1. Challenge over Consultation Process
Both staff and the FBU have challenged the consultation process of the Housing Disposal Policy which was based on previous Day Crew changes and claim that as this consultation was conducted in isolation, it has restricted the consultation on the Transitional Allowance. The Project Board has considered this challenge but feel that the process and the decisions made in developing the Housing Disposal Policy and then the Transitional Allowance has created a fair and equitable arrangement for all Day Crew employees.
2. Fire Brigades Union Proposal
The Fire Brigades Union provided an alternative proposal based on value of Service housing and number of employees with a percentage payment however, this was not regarded as equitable with reference to the Housing or Relocation Policies. The FBU proposal was a more expensive option than the Project Boards proposal. The rationale for the Project Board proposal is to ensure an equitable arrangement for all categories of Day Crewed employees taking account of individual needs using the Relocation and Housing policy as a benchmark.
3. Pay Protection
Pay protection was requested over a period of time, with the removal of housing and allowances received whilst on the Day Crew system. Employees were reminded that these payments are not pension-able payments and as such do not constitute pay and hence there is no facility to protect this allowance. Furthermore HFRS has no legal obligation to provide any pay protection. Rather a more equitable arrangement is the preferred option with the proposal of a Day Crew Financial Adjustment, which will have to be justified to the HR and Finance and General Purposes Committees.
4. Tax Implications
Employees were concerned that they would be liable to income tax on any allowance paid. All allowances are subject to section 62 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. This has implications for both the employer and employee. For more information they have been advised to seek advice from the Inland Revenue.
5. Graduated Payments
A request was made for graduated payments over a period of two or more years to reduce or remove the tax implications. HFRS will consider graduated payments on the Day Crew Financial Adjustment i.e. 2 payments of £5000 over an agreed period based on an individuals financial need. Graduated payments will not be provided to reduce tax payments as we are required to comply with legislation.
6. Relocation Expenses
Concerns were raised over the cost of moving, these were considered and the Project Board agreed that the current Relocation Policy was deemed to be suitable. The Relocation Policy does qualify for up to £8,000 tax exemption, when the location of the job changes. Service Order 1/2/11 provides further guidance, although in these cases it would not be tax free.
S/WP/C/H/HFRA HR Committee 1 12 06 Transitional Allowance Appendix 1
22 November 2006