Archived decisions
Looking After Hampshire, Looking Out for you - Corporate Business Plan - Performance Indicators
Hampshire Safer and More Secure for all | |||
Performance Measure |
Baseline Performance |
Target Performance |
PI Reference/ Comment |
Fear of crime indicator - Percentage of people who feel safe walking outside in the local area alone after dark |
58% (2005) |
64% (March 09) |
(MORI Residents' Survey - Q85) |
Actual crime indicator - Recorded violent crime in public places |
15,969 (2004/05) |
11,929 (over 4 years) |
LAA & LPSA2 |
Outcome 1.1: There is a reassuring, visible uniformed presence | |||
Percentage people stating ACSOs and PCSOs have made a difference in making the area a safer place to live |
22% (2005) |
30% (March 2009) |
LAA E4 LPSA2 |
Outcome 1.2: The users of Hampshire's roads are safer | |||
Road accident casualties - killed/ seriously injured |
613 (2006/07) |
Annual average of 684 over 2005-08 |
BVPI 99a(i) |
Road accident casualties - killed/seriously injured children and young people (aged 0-18) |
56(2006/07) |
75 |
BVPI 99b(i) |
Outcome 1.3: YOUTH CRIME - needs changing or including in one of the other CYPP related outcomes | |||
Percentage reduction in youth re-offending |
37.4% reduction in 2005/06 |
5% reduction |
YOT target |
Outcome 1.4: Children stay safe and feel secure | |||
Review of child protection cases |
99.4% (2005/06) |
99.5% |
BVPI 162 |
Percentage pupils in Hampshire schools who say they have been bullied, inside and outside school |
? |
? |
Annual pupil attitude survey |
Outcome 1.5: Vulnerable adults and older people are protected | |||
Percentage of service users who fall, new indicator |
n/a |
n/a |
First survey will determine benchmark and target to be set for 2008/09 |
Average response time to adult protection cases, new indicator |
n/a |
n/a |
First survey will determine benchmark/ target to be set for 2008 |
Outcome 1.6: Independent living is promoted through community safety initiatives | |||
Number of distraction and artifice burglaries |
3285 (2004/05) |
2628 (March 2009) |
May not be LAA from 1/4/07, but data will still be captured by Hants Constabulary |
Outcome 1.7: Hampshire County Council is prepared in the event of a major emergency/ disaster and has adequate contingency arrangements to ensure the continued delivery of vital services
| |||
Emergency plan tested and reviewed once a year |
Emergency plan tested and reviewed by 31/3/08 |
||
Business continuity plan (BCP) created and tested at least once a year |
BCP issued and tested by 31/3/08 |
||
Outcome 1.8: Hampshire contributes to the mitigation of and adaptation to climate change | |||
Tonnes CO2 from buildings' energy use |
79,100 tonnes (2005/06) |
77,123 tonnes (2006/07) |
A wider climate change adaptation/mitigation measure to be developed |
Maximising Wellbeing | |||
Performance Measure |
Baseline Performance |
Target Performance |
PI Reference/ Comment |
LPSA2 & LAA F1 - Health indicator Number of adults (16+) doing 30 minutes moderate intensity activity 5 times per week |
20% (2005 survey) |
23.5% (2009 survey) |
MORI Residents' Survey - Q90 (Life expectancy indicator being developed nationally) |
LPSA2 & LAA H1 - empowerment of residents Percentage people who feel they can influence decisions affecting their local area or neighbourhood |
31% (September 2005) |
31% (Aim to develop more local targets) |
MORI Residents survey |
Economic prosperity Average rate of growth of Gross Value Added (GVA) per head in Hampshire County Council area compared to the South East region |
Difference = -0.03% (2003) |
Match South East average, year on year |
|
Outcome 2.1: Vulnerable adults and older people are treated in a way which maximises wellbeing, independence and inclusion | |||
Adults with physical disability / learning disabilities / mental health problems / older people helped to live at home |
C29 - 5.99 C30 - 2.7 C31 - 9.34 C32 - 81.43 |
C29 - 6.8 C30 - 2.7 C31 - 10 C32 - 83 |
Adult Services C29/30/31/32 |
Percentage of users surveyed, helped to access universal services |
New measure |
n/a |
First survey will determine benchmark and target to be set for 2008/09 |
Outcome 2.2: Right care in the right place at the right time for users of services for adults and older people | |||
Acceptable waiting times for assessments and care packages |
D55 - 82% D56 - 79.9% (2006/07) |
D55 - 91% D56 - 91% (2007/08) |
D55 & D56 |
Adults with physical disability / learning disabilities / mental health problems / older people helped to live at home |
C29 - 5.99 C30 - 2.7 C31 - 9.34 C32 - 81.43 (2006/07) |
C29 - 6.8 C30 - 2.7 C31 - 10 C32 - 83 (2007/08) |
C29/30/31/32 |
Outcome 2.3: All children and young people enjoy learning and achieve to their full potential | |||
Percentage of pupils achieving Level 5 or above in KS3 Maths tests |
78% 2005/06 |
81% |
BVPI 1b |
Percentage of pupils achieving level 5 or above in KS3 English tests |
77% 2005/06 |
81% |
BVPI 1a |
Percentage of pupils achieving 5A* - C at GCSE (including Maths and English) |
91.7% (2005/06) |
93.5% |
BVPI 3.9 |
Outcome 2.4: Children looked after (for whom the County Council is the corporate parent) have the best possible chances in life and are supported to achieve to their full potential | |||
Percentage of young people leaving care with one GCSE at Grade A*-G or GNVQ |
61.6% |
62% |
BVPI 50 |
Percentage of CLA with three or more placements at 31 March during financial year |
16.6% |
14% |
BVPI 49 |
Adoptions of children looked after |
5.6 |
6 |
BVPI 163 |
Outcome 2.5: People have fair and equal access to services and information | |||
Number of residents who overall feel well informed about Council services and benefits it provides |
44.59% (2006/07) |
To be confirmed |
Q17 User Satisfaction Survey |
Outcome 2.6: All local people, including children and young people and their families, can influence decision making and the ways in which services are designed and delivered | |||
Percentage of people who feel that they can influence decisions affecting their local area or neighbourhood |
31% (September 2005) |
31% (2009) And develop more local targets |
LAA H1 |
Outcome 2.7: Hampshire is a strong, active and diverse community | |||
Percentage of people who feel that the local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together |
63% (September 2005) |
To be confirmed |
LAA only, LAAH3 |
Outcome 2.8: People in Hampshire are healthy and enjoy wellbeing | |||
Number of schools achieving National Healthy Schools Status (enhanced status) in the National Healthy Schools Programme |
34 as at 30 Sep 06 |
486 (Dec 2008) |
LAA A5 |
Outcome 2.9: Disparities in income across Hampshire are reduced and there is general economic prosperity |
|||
Deprivation as measured by the position of Super Output Areas (SOAs) in the national index of multiple deprivation league table |
24 Hampshire SOAs in the worst 20% |
Reduce to 20 by 2009 |
|
Gap between the percentage of people economically active in Hampshire Compared with the UK |
+7.7% (2004/05) |
+8% (2009) |
As LAA Flagship 4 |
% 16-19 year olds who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) |
4.9% (Nov 2005) |
3.8% (2008/09) |
LAA |
Enhancing our Quality of Place | ||||
Performance Measure |
Baseline Performance |
Target Performance
|
PI Reference/ Comment | |
Area satisfaction indicator Percentage of people who are satisfied with Hampshire as a place to live Duplicated PI |
MORI Residents Survey Q2 | |||
Quality of Life PI Air quality
|
||||
Outcome 3.1: The majority of waste is diverted from landfill | ||||
Percentage household waste diverted from landfill |
84% (e) 2006/07 |
85% 2007/08 |
Combined total BVPI 82a, b, & c | |
Outcome 3.2: The roads and pavements of Hampshire are in a good condition | ||||
% of unclassified non-principal roads in need of surface or structural repair |
15% (e) 2006/07 |
To reduce by 1% each year until the target of 11% in 2010/11 |
BVPI 224b | |
Outcome 3.3: Traffic impacts are kept to a minimum | ||||
Percentage of people who feel traffic congestion is one of the three problems in the area |
2006/07 survey results |
MORI Residents Survey, Not LAA | ||
Annual growth rate of all motor vehicle traffic on Hampshire's road network, excluding trunk roads and motorways Growth rate of motor vehicle traffic |
102(e) 2006 |
Not to exceed 1% annual growth rate by 2010/11 |
||
Outcome 3.4: Hampshire is a sustainable community | ||||
Number of housing developments categorised as conforming to the Code for Sustainable Homes |
? 2006/07 |
50% |
? | |
Outcome 3.5: The County Council owned and managed estate and heritage assets benefit Hampshire's quality of place | ||||
CORPORATE MANAGEMENT PLAN | ||||
Performance Measure |
Baseline Performance |
Target Performance |
PI Reference/ Comment | |
External assessment of corporate health CPA Corporate assessment score |
4 / 4 At 2002 |
4 / 4 |
||
Internal assessment of corporate health Corporate governance |
Audit Acceptance of corporate governance annual report |
Annual audit refresh with unqualified opinion |
||
Holistic sustainability standard Overall Aalborg score |
2.02 out of 4 September 2006 |
2.1 out of 4 2008/09 |
||
Outcome CMP 1: Council services offer value for money | ||||
County Council comparison of council tax at band D |
Lowest quartile |
Maintain position in Lowest quartile |
||
County council comparison of percentage BVPIs in top quartile |
Number in Top quartile as at 1Apr 06 |
Number of BVPIs increased by 5 in Top quartile |
||
Outcome CMP 2: Resources follow priorities | ||||
Corporate Business plan development priorities considered alongside demographic, statutory and economic pressures in setting the budget |
2007/08 budget strategy linked to Corporate Strategy |
Funding options for priorities reviewed as part of the budget process |
||
Efficiency target |
Improvements achieved which exceed 2.5% AES target |
Efficiency savings realisable within the budget increased beyond 1% |
||
Outcome CMP 3: Hampshire County Council develops capacity to support its priorities and behaviours to support its organisational values | ||||
The new IiP standards are embedded in the organisation and corporate IiP accreditation is maintained |
Corporate assessment achieved (Mar 02) |
Corporate re-accreditation achieved in July 2007 |
||
Sickness absence days per FTE employed |
7.65 days as at 1 Apr 06 |
7.5 days (2007/08) 6.75 days (2009/10) |
BVPI 12 | |