Archived decisions
Hampshire County Council | |||
Executive Member - Recreation and Heritage |
Item 3 | ||
22 May 2008 |
|||
Community Buildings Fund - 2008/09 | |||
Report of the Director of Recreation and Heritage | |||
Contact: Margaret Plumridge ext: 6173 e-mail: [email protected]
1. Summary
1.1 The County Council works in partnership with specific community organisations particularly community associations and village hall committees who seek to enable local people to meet the recreational, educational, social, cultural and environmental needs of their local communities. These organisations give local people an opportunity to participate in local activities and encourage local initiatives by people of all ages.
1.2 The purpose of this report is:
i) to provide details of the financial position of the Community Buildings Fund for 2008/09
ii) to provide details of requests for partnership funding from the Community Buildings Fund in 2008/09.
1.3 The partnership funding distribution criteria is set out in Appendix 1.
1.4 Projects listed in Appendix 2 meet fully the criteria and have been allocated a proposed level of partnership funding in line with the criteria.
2. Recommendation
2.1 That partnership funding totalling £29,124 be approved for allocation from the Community Buildings Fund for 2008/09 as listed below :-
Hall/Centre |
District |
£ |
All Saints Church, Eastleigh |
Eastleigh |
672 |
Colden Common CA |
Winchester |
4,974 |
East Stratton Village Hall |
Winchester |
12,500 |
Heckfield Memorial Hall |
Hart |
7,000 |
Nursling and Rownhams Village Hall |
Test Valley |
2,278 |
Wellow Village Hall |
Test Valley |
1,700 |
Total |
29,124 |
3. Background
3.1 Partnership funding from the Community Buildings Fund enables the community sector to maintain the quality of Hampshire's cultural assets, namely their village halls and community association buildings, some of which are listed. This finance enables improvements to be made to those buildings and can assist with the development of new facilities where appropriate. The provision of these buildings by the voluntary sector enable local communities to access the services and facilities they need.
3.2 By providing financial support to these organisations for the maintenance of their buildings the County Council is able to work in partnership with the community sector to achieve the Corporate Priority - Enhancing our quality of place.
4. Impact Assessment
4.1 Organisations applying to this scheme are by their nature defined as accessible to all members of the community. This is embodied within their charitable objects, therefore no groups or organisations should be excluded from any benefit arising from these decisions. Furthermore a new application procedure has been introduced which includes equalities monitoring information agreed as part of the corporate review of grants programmes and procedures.
5. Financial Implications
5.1 The sum of £100,000 was set aside to support the Community Buildings Fund in 2008/09. To date £38,029 has been allocated. If the recommendations in this report, which amount to £29,124, are agreed then a balance of £32,847 will remain for the rest of the year. Summaries are set out in appendix 2 from organisations that have requested partnership funding.
6. Legal Implications
6.1 The Council has wide powers under Section 19 Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 to provide recreational facilities and to contribute by way of grant or loan towards expenses incurred by voluntary bodies in providing such facilities.
LINK TO CORPORATE STRATEGY
Yes No
Hampshire safer and more secure for all Ö
Maximising well-being Ö
Enhancing our quality of place Ö
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - Background Documents
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and have been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.
NB the list excludes:
Published works
Documents, which disclose exempt or confidential information as, defined in the Act.
Title Location
Applications for financial assistance Community Support Service
Recreation and Heritage Department
Mottisfont Court
Winchester
Appendix 1
The partnership funding distribution criteria for the Community Buildings Fund is as follows:
Partnership funding is granted for:
· Building repairs, extensions and refurbishments
· Health and safety issues
· Equipment to improve the buildings and increase usage
· Feasibility studies
Who can apply:
· Village halls (not parish run halls)
· Community associations
· Church organisations that have a separate community programme on their property
Funding criteria:
· For projects costing less than £15,000, the funding criteria is up to one third of the cost.
· For projects costing more than £15,000, the grant is calculated at 50% of the combined district and parish contribution up to a maximum of 25% of the project costs or £12,500, whichever is the lesser.
· Feasibility studies - applications will be considered for 50% of the cost up to a maximum of £500.
Priority Criteria:
1. Health and safety issues that could result in the building being closed or activities seriously curtailed if the work is not carried out.
2. The work is absolutely essential in order to meet the terms of the Disability Discrimination Act. (It has been widely publicised that these types of buildings will not be closed provided reasonable steps have been taken to meet the terms of the Act).
3. The project is part of a phased development and this element is essential to it's overall completion.
4. Non priority work.
Appendix 2
Name |
All Saints Church, Eastleigh |
Consultation |
The local members, Councillors Davies-Dear and Broadhurst have been consulted and Cllr Broadhurst supports the application. |
Project |
Replacement of meeting room ceiling and lights |
Criteria |
Non Priority work |
Cost |
£2,015 |
General Reserves |
£1,219 |
Project Reserves |
Nil |
Statement |
The ceiling and light fittings are old and damaged. The hall houses a number of non faith based activities including elderly groups, keep fit, house parties, birthday parties, Club 90, Alcoholics Anonymous and WRAC. |
Funding |
Eastleigh Borough Council - application to be made |
Recommendation |
£672 as one third of project costs. |
Name |
Colden Common Community Association |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Mason, has been consulted. |
Project |
Refurbishing and refitting kitchen |
Criteria |
Health and Safety |
Cost |
£14,922 |
General Reserves |
£5,000 |
Project Reserves |
£2,000 |
Statement |
The kitchen is 16 years old. The new design will replace existing cupboards and provide new cupboard space. The rest of the kitchen needs replacing in order to be energy efficient and for health and safety reasons. |
Funding |
Winchester City Council Nil Parish Council Nil Sita £6,000 application to be made |
Recommendation |
£4,974 as one third of project costs |
Name |
East Stratton Village Hall |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Porter, has been consulted and she is very supportive of the work of this community. |
Project |
To replace the existing village hall |
Criteria |
Health and Safety |
Cost |
£258,000 |
General Reserves |
£457 |
Project Reserves |
£29,000 |
Statement |
The existing building is of the `tin hut' kind and is inadequate especially as it houses the village pre school |
Funding |
Winchester City Council £50,000 Approved Parish Council £30,000 Approved Veolia £100,000 application to be made Garfield Weston £ 40,000 application to be made Parish Council can provide a Public Works loan of £100,000 as an alternative to Veolia funding Village Hall committee is applying for other grants to cover the remainder of the cost. |
Recommendation |
£12,500 as 50% of the combined district and parish contribution up to a maximum of £12,500 |
Name |
Heckfield Memorial Hall (Grade II listed) |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Simpson, has been consulted and he supports this application. |
Project |
Providing a pitched roof and replacement exterior walls to a 1970's extension. Refurbishing kitchen and bar area |
Criteria |
Non priority - general improvement |
Cost |
£53,000 (£9,100 VAT to be reclaimed) |
General Reserves |
£32,000 |
Project Reserves |
£20,000 |
Statement |
The flat roof is leaking. The pitched roof will be more sustainable and better insulated. Replacing the exterior walls will be more consistent with its Grade II listing. The kitchen is to be refurbished to meet current health and safety standards. The modernisation will increase the letting potential of the hall. |
Funding |
Hart District Council - no funding available Heckfield Parish Council - £14,000 agreed |
Recommendation |
£7,000 as 50% of the combined district and parish council contribution up to a maximum of £12,500 |
Name |
Nursling and Rownhams Village Hall |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Perry, has been consulted and he supports the application. |
Project |
New heating and hot water system |
Criteria |
Phased refurbishment |
Cost |
£45,678 |
General Reserves |
£3,476 |
Project Reserves |
None |
Statement |
The present system is old, inefficient and prone to breaking down. |
Funding |
Test Valley BC - £3,428.60 application May 2007 Parish Council - £3,428.60 application May 2007 Veolia - £36,542 40 application May 2007 |
Recommendation |
This organisation would be entitled, under the funding criteria, to a contribution of £3,428.60 as 50% of the combined district and parish council contribution up to a maximum of £12,500. However, they have made two successful applications in the last year but as they have only requested funding of £2,278 for this scheme it is recommended that this sum is agreed. The organisation will be advised that they may next apply to the fund in 2009/10. |
Name |
Wellow Village Hall (Grade II listed) |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Perry, has been consulted and he supports the application. |
Project |
Refurbishment of Village Hall |
Criteria |
Health and safety |
Cost |
£40,267 |
General Reserves |
£10,000 |
Project Reserves |
£3,000 |
Statement |
To bring the hall up to modern environmental standards and ensure health and safety compliance. |
Funding |
Test Valley - £2,150 Wellow Parish Council - £1,250 Viridor Credits - £27,000 |
Recommendation |
£1,700 as 50 % of the combined district and parish council contribution up to a maximum of £12,500 |