Archived decisions
Hampshire County Council | |||
Item 8 | |||
17 July 2008 |
|||
Community Buildings Fund - 2008/09 | |||
Contact: Margaret Plumridge ext: 6173 e-mail: [email protected]
1. Summary
1.1 The County Council works in partnership with specific community organisations particularly community associations and village hall committees who seek to enable local people to meet the recreational, educational, social, cultural and environmental needs of their local communities. These organisations give local people an opportunity to participate in local activities and encourage local initiatives by people of all ages.
1.2 The purpose of this report is:
i) to provide details of the financial position of the Community Buildings Fund for 2008/09
ii) to provide details of requests for partnership funding from the Community Buildings Fund in 2008/09.
1.3 The partnership funding distribution criteria is set out in Appendix 1.
1.4 Projects listed in Appendix 2 meet fully the criteria and have been allocated a proposed level of partnership funding in line with the criteria.
2. Recommendation
2.1 That partnership funding totalling £44,822 be approved for allocation from the Community Buildings Fund for 2008/09 as listed below :-
Hall/Centre |
District |
£ |
Chilbolton Village Hall |
Test Valley |
10,949 |
Hursley Parish Hall |
Winchester |
12,500 |
Liss Community Association |
East Hampshire |
4,851 |
Milford on Sea Community Assn. |
New Forest |
12,500 |
Quarley Village Hall |
Test Valley |
564 |
Rotherwick Village Hall |
Hart |
2,151 |
Twyford Parish Hall |
Winchester |
1,307 |
Total |
44,822 |
3. Background
3.1 Partnership funding from the Community Buildings Fund enables the community sector to maintain the quality of Hampshire's cultural assets, namely their village halls and community association buildings, some of which are listed. This finance enables improvements to be made to those buildings and can assist with the development of new facilities where appropriate. The provision of these buildings by the voluntary sector enable local communities to access the services and facilities they need.
3.2 By providing financial support to these organisations for the maintenance of their buildings the County Council is able to work in partnership with the community sector to achieve the Corporate Priority - Enhancing our quality of place.
4. Impact Assessment
4.1 Organisations applying to this scheme are by their nature defined as accessible to all members of the community. This is embodied within their charitable objects, therefore no groups or organisations should be excluded from any benefit arising from these decisions. Furthermore a new application procedure has been introduced which includes equalities monitoring information agreed as part of the corporate review of grants programmes and procedures.
5. Financial Implications
5.1 The sum of £100,000 was set aside in the Recreation and Heritage Capital Programme to support the Community Buildings Fund in 2008/09. To date £67,153 has been allocated. The recommendations contained in this report, which amount to £44,822, will exceed the budget and so it will be necessary to augment the fund by re-directing £25,000 of the capital programme carry forward currently set aside for landlord improvement works to the community centres owned by the county council. This will reduce the capital programme carry forward to £125,000 which continues to cover our long standing commitments to the following five community centre projects each of which have historically been allocated £25,000:
* Liss CA - new roof to building owned by county council
* Horndean CA - contribution to hall extension and library
* Alton CA - contribution to new centre in partnership with East Hants DC
* Overton CA - phased refurbishment of county owned centre
* Lyndhurst CA - extension to centre and library
If all these recommendations are approved £13,025 will remain unallocated.
6. Legal Implications
6.1 The Council has wide powers under Section 19 Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 to provide recreational facilities and to contribute by way of grant or loan towards expenses incurred by voluntary bodies in providing such facilities.
LINK TO CORPORATE STRATEGY
Yes No
Hampshire safer and more secure for all _
Maximising well-being _
Enhancing our quality of place _
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - Background Documents
The following documents disclose facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and have been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report.
NB the list excludes:
Published works
Documents, which disclose exempt or confidential information as, defined in the Act.
Title Location
Applications for financial assistance Community Support Service
Recreation and Heritage Department
Mottisfont Court
Winchester
Appendix 1
The partnership funding distribution criteria for the Community Buildings Fund is as follows:
Partnership funding is granted for:
· Building repairs, extensions and refurbishments
· Health and safety issues
· Equipment to improve the buildings and increase usage
· Feasibility studies
Who can apply:
· Village halls (not parish run halls)
· Community associations
· Church organisations that have a separate community programme on their property
Funding criteria:
· For projects costing less than £15,000, the funding criteria is up to one third of the cost.
· For projects costing more than £15,000, the grant is calculated at 50% of the combined district and parish contribution up to a maximum of 25% of the project costs or £12,500, whichever is the lesser.
· Feasibility studies - applications will be considered for 50% of the cost up to a maximum of £500.
Priority Criteria:
1. Health and safety issues that could result in the building being closed or activities seriously curtailed if the work is not carried out.
2. The work is absolutely essential in order to meet the terms of the Disability Discrimination Act. (It has been widely publicised that these types of buildings will not be closed provided reasonable steps have been taken to meet the terms of the Act).
3. The project is part of a phased development and this element is essential to it's overall completion.
4. Non priority work.
Appendix 2
Name |
Chilbolton Village Hall |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Woodhall, has been consulted |
Project |
Provision of retractable stage, curtains and lighting |
Cost |
£43,794 |
General Reserves |
Accounts not available at this time |
Project Reserves |
£10,948 |
Statement |
The community has an increasing demand for a purpose built stage in order to support its local amateur productions |
Funding |
Chilbolton Parish Council £5,474 (applied for) Test Valley BC £16,423 (applied for) |
Recommendation |
£10,949 as 50% of the combined district and parish council contribution up to a maximum of £12,500 |
Name |
Hursley Parish Hall |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Bailey, has been consulted |
Project |
Refurbishment and extension to the Parish Hall |
Cost |
£676,000 |
General Reserves |
£11,605 |
Project Reserves |
£11,000 |
Statement |
The hall is in severe disrepair. It needs a new roof and windows. The kitchen and toilets need to be replaced. The building layout needs to be improved in order to make it accessible for all. |
Funding |
Hursley Parish Council £37,148 Winchester City Council £10,000 (approved) Clanbury Trust £1,000 Local Councillor's allocation £2,000 Donation £500,000 |
Recommendation |
£12,500 as 50% of the combined district and parish council contribution up to a maximum of £12,500 |
Name |
Liss Community Association |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Cartwright, has been consulted |
Project |
Refurbishment of office and entrance. Provision of new furniture and cleaner's store |
Cost |
£14,554 |
General Reserves |
£48,000 |
Project Reserves |
|
Statement |
The present office is too cramped and inefficient for the association manager and volunteers to use. In order to provide better office space it is necessary to provide an alternative store. Additionally, access via the current entrance is difficult for people with disabilities and mothers with pushchairs. The new entrance and door will resolve this issue. |
Funding |
Liss Parish Council £2,000 (confirmed) East Hampshire District Council £3,000 (pending) Local Councillor's allocation £2,000 |
Recommendation |
£4,851 as one third of project cost |
Name |
Milford on Sea Community Association |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Rice, has been consulted |
Project |
Building an environmentally friendly community centre |
Cost |
£750,000 |
General Reserves |
£10,000 |
Project Reserves |
£10,000 |
Statement |
Public surveys have identified the need to replace the existing temporary buildings with a larger community centre that can serve the whole community and will be environmentally efficient |
Funding |
Milford Parish Council £100,000 (pending) New Forest District Council £50,000 (pledged 2009) SEEDA £40,000 (pending) Lottery £500,000 (Stage 2 pending) Sale of current building £20,000 Own funds £10,000 Other small trusts applications to be made |
Recommendation |
£12,500 as 50% of the combined district and parish contribution up to a maximum of £12,500 |
Name |
Quarley Village Hall |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Pat West, has been consulted |
Project |
Replacement of toilets |
Cost |
£1,692 |
General Reserves |
£1,500 |
Project Reserves |
£600 |
Statement |
There have been many complaints about the state of the current toilets. The trustees would like to make improvements to ensure they are up to standard for all users including people with disabilities |
Funding |
Quarley Parish Council £250 Test Valley Borough Council £364 |
Recommendation |
£564 as one third of project cost |
Name |
Rotherwick Village Hall |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Glen, has been consulted |
Project |
Roof insulation |
Cost |
£6,452 |
General Reserves |
£64,958 |
Project Reserves |
£3,800 - A further £22,000 to be used to refurbish ladies toilets later in the year |
Statement |
Having recently installed a new boiler it was found that the building had no insulation and therefore the trustees would like to rectify this. |
Funding |
Parish Council £500 Hart District Council do not provide grants for this type of project |
Recommendation |
£2,151 as one third of project cost |
Name |
Twyford Parish Hall |
Consultation |
The local member, Councillor Mason, has been consulted |
Project |
Refurbishment of the main hall |
Cost |
£3,920 |
General Reserves |
£5,000 |
Project Reserves |
Nil |
Statement |
The fluorescent lighting is now obsolete and the final set of wood framed windows need to be replaced by UPVC units. The stage area will also be refurbished and the general décor of the hall improved. |
Funding |
Twyford Parish Council £1,400 (confirmed) Winchester City Council no application |
Recommendation |
£1,307 as one third of project costs |