Archived decisions
Agenda Item: 5
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
Decision Report :
Decision Maker: |
Pension Fund Panel | ||||
Date of Decision: |
21 November 2008 | ||||
Decision Title: |
Frequency of Pension Fund Panel meetings | ||||
Decision Reference: |
441 | ||||
Report From: |
County Treasurer | ||||
Contact name: |
Ian Howell | ||||
Tel: |
01962 847540 |
Email: |
|||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1) Summary of Decision Area:
1.1. To consider changes to the frequency of meetings of the Pension Fund Panel.
2) Issues Covered in Report:
2.1. This report considers changes to the timetable and arrangements for Pension Fund Panel meetings to allow members more time to consider the issues and discuss them with the fund managers.
3) Recommendation:
3.1. That an additional meeting in May is added to the existing pattern of Pension Fund Panel meetings as set out in Table 2 of the main report.
MAIN REPORT
1) Purpose of the Report:
1.1. This report outlines possible changes to the frequency of meetings of the Pension Fund Panel, following concerns expressed at the last meeting of the Panel about the duration of meetings and the lack of time available to consider the issues and question the investment managers.
2) Contextual Information:
2.1. The Pension Fund Panel currently meets four times each year, twice in May and twice in November. Originally, the first meeting was used to meet representatives of the investment managers and the second meeting to deal with `business' items only. With the increase in the Fund's investment managers from four to twelve in January 2007, the Panel has also had to meet managers at the second meetings.
2.2. The frequency with which the Panel currently meets each manager is determined by the risk associated with their portfolios, as the following table shows. The pattern was agreed by the Panel in May 2007 and reviewed in May 2008.
Table 1 - Current frequency of meetings with the managers | |
Twice-a-year | |
Aberdeen |
Global equity portfolio with a high performance target |
AllianceBernstein |
Global equity portfolio with a high performance target |
Newton |
Global equity portfolio with a high performance target |
SGAM |
UK equity portfolio with a high performance target |
Bramdean |
Alternative investments adviser |
Once-a-year | |
Aberdeen |
UK equities portfolio with a low risk target |
Schroders |
UK equities portfolio with a low risk target |
Western |
Global bonds |
CB Richard Ellis |
UK direct and indirect property |
Aberdeen (Goodman) |
European indirect property |
No meetings with the Panel | |
Legal & General |
UK index linked bonds portfolio tracking the index |
State Street |
UK index linked bonds portfolio tracking the index |
2.3. At present, Panel meetings start at 10 am with a 30 minute session to discuss the reports on the Agenda (60 minutes for the `business' meetings). Each investment manager is allowed a 45 minute session, with 20 minutes for their presentation and 25 minutes for the Panel's questions. Aberdeen are allowed 60 minutes when they report on both their global equities and UK equities portfolios. All meetings continue into the afternoon and can involve up to five sessions with investment managers.
3) Options
3.1. The following principles have been followed in preparing proposals for the future pattern of the Panel's meetings:
· increase the time allowed at the start of the meeting to discuss the reports from 30 minutes to 45 minutes for meetings with the investment managers, and from 60 minutes to 90 minutes for the `business' meetings
· ensure each Panel meeting ends before lunch
· reduce the maximum number of managers attending each Panel meeting to four, with three as the norm
· limit the number of managers attending the `business' meeting to one
· maintain the existing frequency with which each manager attends the Panel's meetings, except that Aberdeen would no longer meet the Panel in connection with the European indirect property portfolio and SGAM would meet the Panel once instead of twice.
3.2. The European indirect portfolio is now fully invested and there is less need now for the Panel to see Aberdeen for a portfolio that represents just 2% of the portfolio. Reducing SGAM to once-a-year brings them into line with the other two UK equities managers, although SGAM's portfolio has a higher risk profile. The County Treasurer would continue to meet both Aberdeen Property Investors and SGAM on a regular basis and would report any issues to the Panel. It would be possible to substitute SGAM for another manager at short notice if there were particular matters of concern, subject to SGAM's representatives being available on the relevant date.
3.3. These principles can be achieved by adding one further meeting to the schedule, for example, in May.
Table 2 - Proposed timetable for meetings with the managers | |||
May meeting 1 |
|||
9:30 to 10:15 |
45 mins |
Discussion of reports |
|
10:15 to 11:00 |
45 mins |
Aberdeen global equities |
six-monthly meeting |
11:00 to 11:15 |
15 mins |
Break |
|
11:15 to 12:00 |
45 mins |
AllianceBernstein |
six-monthly meeting |
12:00 to 12:45 |
45 mins |
Newton |
six-monthly meeting |
12:45 to 13:30 |
45 mins |
Bramdean |
six-monthly meeting |
13:30 |
End |
||
May meeting 2 |
|||
10:00 to 10:45 |
45 mins |
Discussion of reports |
|
10:45 to 11:30 |
45 mins |
SGAM |
annual meeting |
11:30 to 11:45 |
15 mins |
Break |
|
11:45 to 12:30 |
45 mins |
Schroders |
annual meeting |
12:30 to 13:15 |
45 mins |
Western |
annual meeting |
13:15 |
End |
||
May meeting 3 - `business' items |
|||
10:00 to 11:30 |
90 mins |
Discussion of reports |
|
11:30 to 11:45 |
15 mins |
Break |
|
11:45 to 12:30 |
45 mins |
CB Richard Ellis |
annual meeting |
12:30 |
End |
||
November meeting 1 |
|||
9:30 to 10:15 |
45 mins |
Discussion of reports |
|
10:15 to 11:15 |
60 mins |
Aberdeen global & UK equities |
six-monthly meeting |
11:15 to 11:30 |
15 mins |
Break |
|
11:30 to 12:15 |
45 mins |
AllianceBernstein |
six-monthly meeting |
12:15 to 13:00 |
45 mins |
Newton |
six-monthly meeting |
13:00 |
End |
||
November meeting 2 - `business' items |
|||
10:00 to 11:30 |
90 mins |
Discussion of reports |
|
11:30 to 11:45 |
15 mins |
Break |
|
11:45 to 12:30 |
45 mins |
Bramdean |
six-monthly meeting |
12:30 |
End |
||
3.4. This should provide a more manageable timetable for the Panel, although the first meeting in May would be a long morning, running from 9:30 to 13:30. It could be reduced if the Panel decided to meet Bramdean just once a year, in November only. This could be justified if further investment in the alternative investments portfolio is to be put on hold. The Panel has previously established an informal sub-group to consider proposals from Bramdean and authorised the County Treasurer to agree investments that are consistent with the overall strategy for the alternative investments portfolio.
4) Recommendations:
Please see recommendations outlined on the Executive Summary
i:\. . . .\ian\docs\penpanel 211108 mgr mtgs.doc
CORPORATE OR LEGAL INFORMATION:
LINKS TO THE CORPORATE STRATEGY | ||||
Yes |
No | |||
Hampshire safer and more secure for all |
||||
Corporate Business plan link no (if appropriate) |
||||
Maximising well-being |
||||
Corporate Business plan link no (if appropriate) |
||||
Enhancing our quality of place |
||||
Corporate Business plan link no (if appropriate) |
||||
OR |
||||
This proposal does not link to the Corporate Strategy but, nevertheless, requires a decision because: | ||||
OTHER SIGNIFICANT LINKS: | ||
Links to Previous member decisions: | ||
Title |
Ref |
Date |
Direct Links to Specific Legislation or Government Directives | ||
Title |
Date | |
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background documents | |
The following documents discuss facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and have been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. (NB: the list excludes published works and any documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.) | |
Document |
Location |
None |
|
COMPREHENSIVE RISK & IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
Race and Equality Impact assessment
Race and equality impact assessment has been considered in the development of this report and no adverse impact has been identified.
Crime prevention issues
The County Council has a legal obligation under Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 to consider the impact of all the decisions it makes on the prevention of crime. The proposals in this report have no impact on the prevention of crime.