Archived decisions
Adult Services
Proposals for growth and redeployment 2009/10 to 2011/12
Proposals are shown at outturn prices for the relevant year.
Agreed proposals will be incorporated into future year's base budgets and so on-going costs are shown in the first year only. One-off costs are shown in the first year and subtracted from the following year.
Staffing (FTEs) |
||||||||
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
Link to Corporate Strategy | ||
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
||||||
Growth proposals and unavoidable service pressures: |
||||||||
Dependency & Demographic |
9,895 |
8,613 |
7,353 |
19 |
9 |
8 |
c) 1.1 | |
Commissioning/ inflation |
3,354 |
478 |
478 |
- |
- |
- |
c) 2.1 | |
* |
Transformation Programme |
588 |
(1,291) |
146 |
9 |
(2) |
5 |
a) 1.2 |
Safe and Secure |
652 |
(41) |
- |
9 |
(1) |
- |
a) 2.10 | |
Other operational pressures |
3,978 |
(115) |
(12) |
22 |
- |
- |
c) 1.1 | |
Unallocated balance to meet unidentified growth and pressures in future years |
- |
550 |
- |
|||||
Total increase |
18,467 |
8,194 |
7,965 |
59 |
6 |
13 |
||
* |
This plus £3.6m funded by Social Care Reform Grant makes the total increase £22m | |||||||
|
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
Link to Corporate Strategy | |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
FTEs |
FTEs |
FTEs |
|||
Redeployment and savings proposals: |
||||||||
Dependency & Demographic |
(1,500) |
(500) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c) 1.3 a) 3.1 | |
Commissioning/ inflation |
(1,528) |
(553) |
(844) |
- |
- |
- |
c) 1.3 a) 3.1 | |
Transformation Programme |
(1,126) |
(30) |
(60) |
(1) |
- |
- |
c) 1.3 a) 3.1 | |
Other operational pressures |
(4,145) |
(96) |
- |
(4) |
- |
- |
c) 1.3 a) 3.1 | |
Efficiencies to be identified |
- |
(3,455) |
(4,461) |
c) 1.3 a) 3.1 | ||||
Efficiencies subtotal |
(8,299) |
(4,634) |
(5,365) |
(5) |
- |
- |
||
Scope to increase income |
(7) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c) 1.3 a) 3.1 | |
Scope to reduce services |
(6) |
(15) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c) 1.3 a) 3.1 | |
Total redeployment proposals |
(8,312) |
(4,649) |
(5,365) |
(5) |
- |
- |
||
Net growth pressures |
10,155 |
3,545 |
2,600 |
54 |
6 |
13 |
||
Planned underspend from 2008/09 |
(3,455) |
3,455 |
- |
|||||
Net growth |
6,700 |
7,000 |
2,600 |
54 |
6 |
13 |
||
Guideline additional funding |
6,700 |
7,000 |
2,600 |
Children's Services
1. Proposals for growth and redeployment 2009/10 to 2011/12 - Schools
Proposals are shown at outturn prices for the relevant year.
Agreed proposals will be incorporated into future years' base budgets and so on-going costs are shown in the first year only. One-off costs are shown in the first year and subtracted from the following year.
Staffing (FTEs) | ||||||
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 | |
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
||||
Growth proposals: |
||||||
Growth in Delegated Funding |
||||||
General Deprivation Funding |
2,043 |
4,039 |
61.0 |
112.0 |
||
Children Looked After |
100 |
-100 |
||||
English as additional Language / Ethnic Minority |
212 |
248 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
||
Pay and Benefits in delegated budgets |
1,401 |
2,070 |
||||
ICT for Schools |
1,000 |
|||||
Outreach work for Special |
108 |
111 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
||
Mainstreaming Autistic Provision |
110 |
2.0 |
||||
Infant Class Size |
52 |
|||||
Independent Safeguarding |
150 |
-150 |
||||
Sub-total Delegated Growth Proposals |
5,066 |
6,328 |
- |
72.0 |
125.0 |
- |
Growth Non Delegated Funding |
||||||
14 to19 Provision |
750 |
|||||
Extended Early Years Entitlement |
1,070 |
470 |
||||
Early Years SEN |
52 |
55 |
||||
New SEN Early Years Resourced Provision |
145 |
110 |
||||
Early Years Formula - Transition |
56 |
|||||
SEN Preventative Services |
59 |
|||||
Pay and Benefits - Central Spending |
119 |
159 |
||||
Specialist Education Support for Children |
27 |
1.0 |
||||
Prudential Borrowing - Autistic Provision |
165 |
|||||
Communication and Language Team |
99 |
2.0 |
||||
Specialist Teacher Advisory Service |
73 |
2.0 |
||||
Behaviour Intervention Service |
40 |
|||||
Education Inclusion Service |
200 |
5.1 |
||||
Ethnic Minority Service |
44 |
0.4 |
||||
Admissions |
150 |
75 |
3.0 |
|||
Other Supply Cover |
100 |
|||||
Children Looked After in Early Years Settings |
92 |
|||||
Minibus Driver Training |
20 |
40 |
||||
Equal Pay Fund |
396 |
-396 |
||||
Sub-total Non Delegated Growth Proposals |
2,683 |
1,487 |
13.5 |
|||
Total increase allowed in the budget guidelines |
7,749 |
7,815 |
- |
85.5 |
125.0 |
- |
2. Proposals for growth and redeployment 2009/10 to 2011/12 - Non Schools
Proposals are shown at outturn prices for the relevant year.
Agreed proposals will be incorporated into future year's base budgets and so on-going costs are shown in the first year only. One-off costs are shown in the first year and subtracted from the following year.
Staffing (FTEs) |
||||||||
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
Link to Corporate Strategy | ||
£000 |
£000 |
£000 |
||||||
Growth proposals: |
||||||||
Building Schools for the Future |
200 |
100 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
a) 1.5 | |||
Children in Care (Foster Care allowances, skills fees and support) |
600 |
550 |
500 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
a)2.3 | |
Family Group Conferences |
50 |
50 |
c) 1.1 | |||||
Wessex Youth Offending Team |
25 |
1.0 |
b) 5.4 a) 1.1 | |||||
Home to School Transport |
800 |
200 |
200 |
c) 1.1 | ||||
Services for Young People |
381 |
351 |
330 |
b) 1.5 | ||||
IT Operational Investment |
339 |
b) 1.7 | ||||||
Interest on School Balances |
750 |
c) 2.1 | ||||||
Other Operational Pressures |
168 |
48 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
Various | |||
Young Carers |
45 |
b) 1.7 | ||||||
One-off Invest to Save Funding in 2008/09 |
1,400 |
|||||||
Invest to Save Repayment |
1,400 |
-1,400 |
||||||
Resources to be Allocated |
2,120 |
|||||||
Total Growth Proposals |
4,758 |
2,699 |
1,750 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
1.5 |
1.5 | |
Redeployment proposals: |
||||||||
Reduction in Independent Fostering Placements |
-300 |
-600 |
-800 |
a) 3.1 C) 1.3 | ||||
Re-profiling of Children in Care Budgets |
-400 |
a) 3.1 C) 1.3 | ||||||
Reduced Contribution to Hampshire Inspection and Advisory Service |
-315 |
a) 3.1 C) 1.3 | ||||||
Home to School Transport contracts |
-200 |
-200 |
-200 |
a) 3.1 C) 1.3 | ||||
Denominational Transport |
-25 |
a) 3.1 C) 1.3 | ||||||
Use of Grant Flexibility |
-756 |
95 |
a) 3.1 C) 1.3 | |||||
Further Savings to be Identified |
-1,562 |
-734 |
a) 3.1 C) 1.3 | |||||
Total Redeployment Proposals |
-3,558 |
-1,439 |
-1,000 |
a) 3.1 C) 1.3 | ||||
Total increase allowed in the budget guidelines |
1,200 |
1,260 |
750 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
1.5 |
||
Total Schools and Non Schools: |
||||||||
Growth Proposals |
12,507 |
10,514 |
1,750 |
92.5 |
129.0 |
1.5 |
||
Redeployment Proposals |
-3,558 |
-1,439 |
-1,000 |
- |
- |
- |
||
Net Growth and Redeployment Proposals |
8,949 |
9,075 |
750 |
92.5 |
129.0 |
1.5 |
||
Environment
Summary of service pressures, redeployment of resources and savings 2009/10 to 2011/12
Proposals are shown at outturn prices for the relevant year.
Agreed proposals will be incorporated into future year's base budgets and so on-going costs are shown in the first year only. One-off costs are shown in the first year and subtracted from the following year.
Staffing (FTEs) |
|||||||
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
Link to Corporate Strategy | |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|||||
SERVICE PRESSURES | |||||||
Highways maintenance Routine highways maintenance | |||||||
Term highways contract - excess inflation arising from annual contract re-pricing |
665 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c) 2.1 |
Flood mitigation and response - preparation of management plan, mapping and additional infrastructure works |
380 |
-50 |
-50 |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.5 b) 7.3 |
Verge and shrub maintenance - additional sum to manage shrub encroachment |
50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
A and B roads speed limit review |
50 |
- |
-50 |
- |
- |
- |
b) 3.2 b) 3.3 a) 1.4 |
Street lighting | |||||||
Street lighting PFI - higher maintenance costs |
300 |
300 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.7 |
Energy - price rises at end of current contract |
- |
- |
1,000 |
- |
- |
- |
c) 2.1 |
Total highways maintenance |
1,445 |
250 |
900 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Road safety | |||||||
Village 30 - advertising and enforcement |
213 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
b) 3.3 a) 1.4 |
Total road safety |
213 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Public transport | |||||||
Bus subsidies - estimated higher costs arising from area retendering process, commercial service de-registrations, revenue support for ferries and tendering community transport contracts |
272 |
502 |
375 |
- |
- |
- |
c) 2.1 |
Fall out of existing external funding (DfT bus challenge funding for Fordingbridge and Romsey) |
- |
45 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c) 2.4 |
Total public transport |
272 |
547 |
375 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Staffing and support costs |
|||||||
Traffic Management Act (TMA) - additional resources required for works and event co-ordination under TMA Network Management Duty |
60 |
100 |
- |
2 |
4 |
- |
b) 3.4 a) 3.6 |
Income - estimated reduction in net income from land search and other development related fees |
100 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c)2.2 |
IT - additional costs arising from departmental office moves and implementation of Hampshire workstyle programme |
214 |
-23 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a)3.1 |
Partnership activities - replacement of one-off funding for contribution to Partnership for Urban South Hampshire |
85 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.6 |
Externally funded staff - provision for additional staff within Landscape, Planning and Heritage, and Ecology sections |
78 |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
- |
c) 1.3 a) 3.1 |
Total staffing and support costs |
537 |
177 |
- |
4 |
4 |
- |
|
Major scheme development | |||||||
Replacement of one-off funding towards the development of major transport schemes |
480 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.6 |
Total major scheme Development |
480 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total service pressures |
2,947 |
978 |
1,275 |
4 |
4 |
- |
|
REDEPLOYMENT AND SAVINGS PROPOSALS | |||||||
Term highways contract - programme of initiatives to improve efficiencies under the contract |
50 |
50 |
50 |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Street lighting PFI - agreed corporate funding towards project |
300 |
- |
-300 |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.7 |
Safer Roads Partnership - anticipated reduction in County Council contribution to Partnership |
213 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Waste management - reduced budget requirement for abandoned vehicles |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Staffing and support costs - staff savings arising from management reviews and other efficiencies |
579 |
- |
- |
-18 |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Non staff overheads - various efficiency savings |
60 |
18 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Externally funded staff - match funding income from other local authorities and highways consultant fees |
78 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 4.3 |
Transport capital programme - transfer to provide funding towards the development of major transport schemes |
300 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Re-prioritisation of budgets to accommodate spending pressures and offset higher inflation costs |
1,217 |
472 |
225 |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Public transport - savings from reduction in publicity for one year and use of savings available in base budget |
50 |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Future funding to be identified, including sums required to offset higher street lighting PFI and energy costs |
- |
459 |
1,300 |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Total redeployment and saving proposals |
2,947 |
978 |
1,275 |
-18 |
- |
- |
|
Policy and Resources Service
Proposals for growth and redeployment 2009/10 to 2011/12
Proposals are shown at outturn prices for the relevant year.
Agreed proposals will be incorporated into future year's base budgets and so on-going costs are shown in the first year only. One-off costs are shown in the first year and subtracted from the following year.
Staffing (FTEs) |
|||||||
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
Link to Corporate Strategy | |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
|||||
Redeployment proposals: | |||||||
Chief Executive: | |||||||
HR pay and benefits team |
425 |
-425 |
- |
- |
-7 |
- |
c) 1.2 |
HR team - equal pay claims |
125 |
-60 |
-65 |
- |
-1 |
-1 |
c) 1.2 |
Employment law team - equal pay litigation |
100 |
-50 |
-50 |
- |
-1 |
-1 |
c) 1.2 |
External legal costs - equal pay litigation |
150 |
-75 |
-75 |
- |
- |
- |
c) 1.2 |
County Treasurer: | |||||||
Pay and benefits implementation |
45 |
-45 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c) 1.2 |
Property, Business and Regulatory Services: | |||||||
Community Safety Officer Service |
50 |
- |
- |
- |
a) 1.1 | ||
Hampshire workstyle project team costs |
249 |
-249 |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 | |
Carbon reduction commitment |
187 |
-187 |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.5 | |
Property Services |
200 |
-200 |
- |
- |
- |
||
Total redeployment proposals |
1,531 |
-1,291 |
-190 |
- |
-9 |
-2 |
|
Funding: |
|||||||
Transfers from capital |
636 |
-636 |
c)1.3 | ||||
Transfer from SEERA budget |
50 |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 | |||||
Pay and Benefits reserve |
845 |
-655 |
-190 |
c) 1.2 | |||
Total funding |
1,531 |
-1,291 |
-190 |
||||
Recreation and Heritage
Proposals for growth and redeployment 2009/10 to 2011/12
Proposals are shown at outturn prices for the relevant year.
Staffing (FTEs) |
|||||||
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
Link to Corporate Strategy | |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£000 | |||||
Growth proposals: | |||||||
Spydus |
150 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c) 1.2 |
Transforming through Technology Agenda (including Hants File) |
70 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
c) 1.2 |
Health and Safety Auditor |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 1.6 |
Rural Strategy Implementation |
30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 2.1 |
Adult Learning |
35 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 1.6 |
Countryside Access Grants |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 1.6 |
Service Development |
70 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 1.6 |
Youth Officer |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 1.6 |
Total increase allowed in the budget guidelines |
430 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Redeployment proposals: |
-430 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a) 3.1 c) 1.3 |
Total redeployment proposals |
-430 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Net change |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Linking Spending and Savings Proposals to the Corporate Strategy
Key to references in Appendix 2A to 2E
a) Corporate Improvement Priorities
1 Customer / Community Focus - What People Want
1.1 Community Safety: Work in partnership to tackle violent crime and assault with injury
1.2 Personalisation: Roll out the personalisation agenda (inc work with partners)
1.3 Road Maintenance: Improve the condition of the most highly trafficked roads (principal & non principal) and reprioritise spending to prevent pot hole formation and flood risk
1.4 Road Safety: Reduce road accidents (KSI) and local traffic calming (e.g. Village 30)
1.5 Schools: Maintain and continue to improve general school attainment
1.6 Culture and Recreation:
· Widen services to older people, including access, wellbeing and adult learning
· Grow offer to young people universally to improve wellbeing (in addition to intervention services)
1.7 Extra Care: Increase the level of extra care housing options
1.8 Care Services: Improve acceptable waiting times for care packages and equipment
1.9 Waste: Increase recycling and further reduce landfill
1.10 Community Intelligence and Engagement: Strengthen understanding and influence of the local community, particularly hard to reach groups
1.11 Service Channels: Continue to exploit Hantsdirect and new avenues for access
1.12 Locality Working: Develop locality working
2 Reducing Inequalities
2.1 Rural: Tackle inequalities of access to local services in rural areas, particularly for older and younger people, and strengthen rural sustainability
2.2 Inequalities: Address inequalities, particularly health and economic
2.3 Children in Care: Improve placement stability and educational attainment
2.4 Safeguarding: Secure child safeguarding, specifically repeat child protection plans
2.5 Vulnerable Groups: Narrow the attainment and life chances gap
2.6 Children with Disabilities: Extend respite and leisure opportunities
2.7 Health Services: Improve health services for children, specifically CAMHS, teenage conceptions and obesity
2.8 NEET: Reduce young people not in employment, education or training
2.9 Permanently Excluded from School: Reduce the number and strengthen alternative educational provision
2.10 Safeguarding: Improve the number of adults referred and Board membership
2.11 Quality of Life: Increase telecare take-up, integrated single assessments and direct payments
2.12 Learning Disabilities: Help adults with a learning disability to live at home
2.13 Deprived Communities: Grow aspirations, community development and cohesion
3 Improving Capacity to Deliver
3.1 Value for Money: Deliver the efficiency programme, corporate and central services review and Hants workstyle
3.2 Strategic HR: Strengthen workforce planning and organisational development
3.3 VCS: Increase engagement and develop capacity in the voluntary and community sector
3.4 Joint Working with Health: Increase learning disability clients living in NHS campuses, continuing healthcare, joint budgets and co-production
3.5 Sustainability and Climate Change: Foster and encourage sustainability and build resilience to climate change
3.6 Growth: Manage growth, including transport, planning, housing and utilities
3.7 Street Lighting PFI: Manage the risks and implementation
b) Local Area Agreement Themes
1 Children and Young People (A)
1.1 Improve mental and emotional health
1.2 Tackle childhood obesity
1.3 Reduce teenage pregnancies
1.4 Reduce the gap in achievements of the most vulnerable children
1.5 Improve the life chances of 16-19 year olds at risk of under-achievement
1.6 Improve services for children in care and on the edge of care
1.7 Safeguarding children
1.8 Statutory targets - early years progress, school attainment, secondary school absence, attainment of looked after children
2 Employment, Skills and Business Support (B)
2.1 Improving skills
2.2 Employment
2.3 Business growth
2.4 Resident / Worker earnings gap
3 Accessibility and Transport (C)
3.1 Highway maintenance
3.2 Road safety and casualties
3.3 Quality of life and safety in rural villages
3.4 Congestion hot-spots
3.5 Accessibility
4 Housing and Accommodation (D)
4.1 Affordable housing
4.2 Fuel poverty
5 Safer Communities (E)
5.1 Domestic abuse
5.2 Reduced adult re-offending
5.3 Drug related offending
5.4 Youth Justice system entrants
6 Health and Wellbeing (F)
6.1 Emergency hospital admission risk, especially for vulnerable people
6.2 Information and support for older people to live independently
6.3 Improved health and wellbeing and reduced inequalities related to deprivation
6.4 Promote independent living for vulnerability
6.5 Alcohol abuse
7 Environment (G)
7.1 Efficient use of material resources
7.2 Mitigate progress of climate change
7.3 Adapt to consequences of climate change
8 Strong Communities (H)
8.1 Improve community engagement
8.2 Sustainable third sector
c) Financial context to the corporate strategy
1 Financial Context to the Corporate Strategy
1.1 Demographic and legislative pressures:
· Aging population and increased number of young people with complex disabilities living into adulthood
· Higher waste disposal costs due to national policies linked to landfill and hazardous waste directives
· Increased numbers of vulnerable children being identified
1.2 Major change programmes:
· Development of Hantsdirect
· Pay and benefits programme
1.3 Review programmes to enable spending pressures to be accommodated and to achieve targeted efficiency savings
2 Financial Management Policies
2.1 In order to allow services to operate within firm cash limits, allocate provision for inflation to services at the start of the financial year and require excess inflation to be absorbed.
2.2 Services expected to contain spending within the approved cash limit with no supplementary allocations being available other than in exceptional circumstances unless a specific contingency provision made within the budget
2.3 Services expected to carry forward 100% of any overspending against the overall service case limit, but are allowed to retain up to 100% of any planned underspending identified prior to the approval of the following year's budget. 50% of any unplanned underspending can automatically be carried forward
2.4 Encourage chief officers to submit applications for specific grant / partnership funding designed to maximise the resources available to the County Council, by allowing capital and revenue cash limits to be adjusted to reflect changes in grant levels
2.5 Require Services to review the level of fees and charges at least annually and set budget limits on the assumption that the level of charges will be increased in line with assumed inflation on gross expenditure.