Archived decisions
1 1
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
Decision Report
Decision Maker: |
Executive Member - Policy and Resources | ||
Date of Decision: |
4 March 2009 | ||
Decision Title: |
Project Appraisal: M27 Junction 5 Improvement Scheme - Phase 1 | ||
Decision Reference: |
457 | ||
Report From: |
Director of Environment | ||
Contact Name: |
Heather Walmsley | ||
Telephone: |
01962 846089 |
E-mail: |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1) Summary of Decision Area:
1.1. Approval is sought to implement Phase 1 of the M27 junction 5 improvement scheme, subject to securing the necessary land and funding.
1.2. Authorisation is sought for the acquisition of the land required for the scheme on terms to be agreed by the Acting Director of Property Business and Regulatory Services (Interim Head of Estates) and associated temporary and mitigation works to be commenced.
1.3. Notice is given that Traffic Regulation Orders and a Footpath Diversion Order will be advertised subject to the recommendations in this report being approved.
1.4. A single contract for Phases 1 and 2 is to be explored, to maximise cost efficiencies if funding streams permit.
2) Issues Covered in Report:
2.1. Full scheme justification and policy background is provided, based upon the need to improve accessibility in the area and also the need to provide infrastructure improvements in order to cater for growth requirements identified in the South East Plan and Regional Transport Strategy.
2.2. Background details are provided for the full scheme proposed at this junction, including signalisation and dedicated left slip roads on Wide Lane, A335 Stoneham Way and the M27 Westbound off-slip.
2.3. Details of the proposed phasing of these works are also provided, setting out the specific details for Phase 1 of the scheme, which forms the basis of the decision required as part of this report.
2.4. The need to acquire third party land, promote Traffic Regulation Orders and a Footpath Diversion Order is covered in the report.
3) Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
3.1. The Project Appraisal to implement Phase 1 of the M27 junction 5 (Westbound Off-Slip), at an estimated cost of £2.65 million, be approved, subject to:
(i) the award of £1.914 million of New Growth Point Funding from Partnership for Urban South Hampshire being ratified by the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Joint Committee on 19 March; and
(ii) all necessary land being acquired.
3.2. Authorisation be given to the Director of Environment to explore the scope for combining Phases 1 and 2, as detailed in the report, within a single contract, so as to maximise any benefits and cost efficiencies to the County Council in delivering this project.
3.3. Authorisation be given for the Acting Director of Property Business and Regulatory Services (Interim Head of Estates) to:
(i) agree suitable terms and conditions for the acquisition, dedication or licence of any land and/or easement required for all phases of the scheme that is owned by the Highways Agency and other third parties;
(ii) agree suitable terms and conditions for the acquisition or dedication of any land and/or easement required for the scheme in relation to land required from Southampton University; and
(iii) implement the dedication or appropriation of land owned by the County Council to highway purposes on terms to be agreed with the holding Department.
3.4. Notice be given of the County Council's intention to advertise appropriate traffic orders to:
(i) reduce the speed limit on the roundabout circulatory carriageway to 40 mph, and reduce the speed limit on A335 Stoneham Way to 50 mph under Phase 1; and
(ii) reduce the speed limit on A335 Wide Lane to 40 mph, and revoke the current waiting restriction on Wide Lane lay-by under Phase 2.
MAIN REPORT
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE MEMBER FOR POLICY AND RESOURCES |
PROJECT APPRAISAL (Externally Funded) |
_____________________________________________
4 MARCH 2009
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
PROJECT: |
M27 JUNCTION 5 IMPROVEMENT SCHEME - PHASE 1 |
______________________________________________________________
COMMENCEMENT DATE: |
JULY 2009 |
COMPLETION DATE: |
DECEMBER 2010 |
PLANNED YEAR OF START IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL PROGRAMME: 2009/10 |
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
16.2 |
Phase 2 - A335 Wide Lane (Future Phase not part of this Project Appraisal) | ||||
Expenditure |
£'000 |
Funds Available |
£'000 | ||
Design Fee |
100 |
New Growth Point Funding via PUSH (subject to ratification at the PUSH JC on 19 March) |
1,915 | ||
Supervision |
265 |
||||
Project Works & land |
2,885 |
||||
____ |
____ | ||||
Total |
3,250 |
Total |
1,915 | ||
____ |
(subject to ratification at the PUSH JC on 19 March) |
____ | |||
16.3 |
Phase 3 - Northern Side of Junction (Future Phase, not part of this project appraisal) | ||||
Expenditure |
£'000 |
Funds Available |
£'000 | ||
Design Fee |
100 |
None Identified at this time | |||
Supervision |
250 |
||||
Project Works & land |
2,100 |
||||
____ |
____ | ||||
Total |
2,450 |
Total |
N/A | ||
____ |
____ | ||||
16.4 |
Revenue Implications |
£'000 |
% Variation to Committee's budget | ||
Net increase in current expenditure |
|||||
Capital Charge |
£53,000 |
0.041 | |||
_______ |
_______ | ||||
Total Expenditure |
£53,000 |
0.041 | |||
_______ |
_______ | ||||
17. 17.1 |
Maintenance Implications These include for the ongoing maintenance of the extra areas of new road, footways and supplementary items resulting from the scheme proposals. This will be taken into account at the setting of the annual base budget. Capital charges will be £53,000 (0.041% variation to budget). |
______________________________________________________________
18. Conclusion
18.1 The complete M27 junction 5 improvement scheme will improve accessibility in the vicinity of Southampton International Airport, Southampton Parkway Station and Eastleigh town centre. It will provide necessary infrastructure improvements in order to help cater for the planned growth requirements of the South East Plan also identified as part of the Regional Transport Strategy and will facilitate the development of the Chickenhall Lane Link Road as the key direct access road to the South Hampshire Strategic Employment Zone/newly named Eastleigh RiverSide. The implementation of Phase 1 will provide the precursor to the remainder of the scheme and will provide key traffic and safety benefits on the west-bound motorway off-slip as well as some marginal benefit to the circulatory traffic on the rest of the roundabout.
1800/Rpt/457/HW
CORPORATE OR LEGAL INFORMATION:
LINKS TO THE CORPORATE STRATEGY | |||
Yes |
No | ||
Hampshire safer and more secure for all |
|||
Corporate Business plan link no (if appropriate) |
|
||
Maximising well-being |
|||
Corporate Business plan link no (if appropriate) |
|
||
Enhancing our quality of place |
|||
Corporate Business plan link no (if appropriate) |
|
||
OTHER SIGNIFICANT LINKS: | ||
Links to Previous member decisions: | ||
Title |
Ref |
Date |
None |
|
|
Direct Links to Specific Legislation or Government Directives | |
Title |
Date |
None |
|
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background documents | |
The following documents discuss facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and have been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. (NB: the list excludes published works and any documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.) | |
Document |
Location |
Scheme working files |
Transport for South Hampshire and Engineering Consultancy, Winchester |
COMPREHENSIVE RISK & IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
1) Equalities Impact Assessment:
a) Assessment of the Race Relations (Amendment) Act has been considered in the development of this scheme. No adverse impact has been identified in terms of race, creed or gender.
2) Impact on Crime and Disorder:
a) The provisions of the Act have no impact on this proposal.
3) Climate Change:
a) How does what is being proposed impact on our carbon footprint / energy consumption?
b) How does what is being proposed consider the need to adapt to climate change, and be resilient to its longer term impacts?
The impact on climate change of the scheme in the long term can be considered to be neutral, primarily due to the Scheme improving traffic flow and alleviating congestion. This improvement in traffic flow will lead to a reduction in vehicle carbon dioxide emissions due to more efficient fuel consumption. The Kyoto Protocol has stipulated that carbon dioxide emissions must be reduced and it is thought to contribute to 66% of the global greenhouse effect. The improvement in traffic flow may increase the volume of traffic using the junction, however as climate change is a global rather than local effect, it can be assumed that if these additional vehicles were not using this junction they would be using another junction, therefore the overall carbon dioxide emissions would remain the same. Carbon dioxide emissions may increase though during the 18 month construction period due to traffic congestion. Thus on a short time scale the impact on climate change could be considered to be slightly adverse.