Archived decisions
Hampshire Fire and Rescue Authority Human Resources Committee Item 9 3rd July 2009 Child Protection Arrangements
Report of the Chief Officer |
Contact: Geoff Howsego, HR Director HFRS Email: [email protected] Tel: 02380 626 842 |
APPENDIX A
Strategic Risk Register - Risk 11
Risk exposure: |
Showing direction of travel since last review (éèê) |
R 20 è | ||
Initial score | ||||
Likelihood (L): 3è |
Impact (I): 5è |
Exposure score (L) x (I) = 15 |
||
Current Score | ||||
Likelihood (L): 4è |
Impact (I): 5è |
Exposure score (L) x (I) = | ||
Target Score (when all controls in place) | ||||
Likelihood (L): 1 |
Impact (I): 5 |
Exposure score (L) x (I) = 5 |
||
Impact: Social, Reputational, Political |
· Litigation against the Authority and potential award of financial penalties and costs. · Adverse publicity, damaged reputation to the service and consequential loss of stakeholder confidence in all the youth engagement initiatives that the Service delivers. · Consequential damage to the Service core values. · Possible implications on individuals if allegations made · Possible adverse effect on industrial relations. |
Control measures: |
Target date/ Control owner: |
Prevention measures - to reduce Likelihood (L): |
|
Controls in place |
|
A Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) audit of personnel whose primary role is a youth engagement activity has been completed, and enhanced CRB checks undertaken for all of these staff. Recording procedures have been amended to enable future management audits with a `bring forward' renewal summary established. |
Human Resources Manager (Workforce Planning) |
A review of Youth Engagement Approvals procedure has been completed and the approval documents reviewed and consolidated to provide the basis for new youth engagement initiatives to be identified and approved. CRB checks and Risk Assessment routing are inherent within the final product to ensure both are available and auditable prior to any activity commencing. This process is incorporated into the Community Risk Reduction Initiative process. |
I Group |
Proposed controls |
|
Service Order 1/13 Criminal Disclosure Procedure to be revised following an investigation by the Director of Human Resources. |
2008/09 |
A risk assessment audit process for Youth Engagement initiatives has been developed and trialled. A full audit is scheduled to be undertaken for all `live' Youth Engagement initiatives. |
2008/09 |
All new grey book or relevant green book employees will be CRB checked before being issued a formal contract with the Service, or being allowed to take up duties. |
Q4 2008/09 |
Systematic controls to be introduced to ensure that holders of regulated posts have current CRB checks |
2008/09 |
All Grey book and relevant green book staff are to have CRB checks completed, and refreshed on a 3 - yearly basis. |
To be rolled out over 3 years - target date 2011-12 |
A full review of community safety working practices will be undertaken, overseen by a suitable qualified individual. |
Q4 2008/09 (children and young people) Q1 2009/10 vulnerable adults) |
All proposed or new activities, where there is contact with the public will be risk assessed and safe working practices instigated. Where appropriate, a child protection officer will be required to scrutinise the regimes in place. |
Q4 2008/09 |
Mitigation measures - to reduce Impact (I): |
Target date/ Control owner: |
Controls in place |
|
Marketing and communications emergency media plan |
Head of Marketing & Communications |
Proposed controls |
|
Nil |
Performance indicators: |
Last updated December 2008 |
Last reviewed:By HFRA: September 2008 CMT: February 2008 By SMT: October 2008 |
Appendix B
The Criminal Records Bureau
Introduction
The Criminal Records Bureau (CRB), is an Executive Agency of the Home Office and provides wider access to criminal record information through its disclosure service. This service enables organisations in the public, private and voluntary sectors to make safer recruitment decisions by identifying candidates who may be unsuitable for certain work, especially that involving children or vulnerable adults. The CRB was established under Part V of the Police Act 1997 and was launched in March 2002.
Prior to 2002, access to police checks was mainly confined to organisations in the statutory sector for staff who had `substantial unsupervised access' to children. There were many other organisations that could not access these checks and yet had staff with similar access to vulnerable groups. The CRB enables many more organisations to access these checks as part of good recruitment practice.
Organisations wishing to use the service can ask successful job applicants to apply for one of two types of check. The type of check required will depend upon the nature of the position. These are called Enhanced and Standard Disclosures, both require a fee but are free of charge to volunteers.
Who runs the CRB?
The CRB is run as an Executive Agency of the Home Office by Civil Servants. The main UK office covers submissions from organisations in the UK and Wales, but a separate bureau has been established in Scotland that will undertake checks for UK organisations as well. The service is delivered through a number of strategic partnerships with:
· The Police. For the provision of information that is held on the Police National Computer and held locally by the forces
· Capita. CRB's private sector partner that operates an administration infrastructure and call centre
· Registered Bodies. As the primary contact point for checking Disclosure applications and validating information provided by the applicant; establishing the identity of the applicant; submitting a fully completed application form; countersigning the application form to confirm entitlement
CRB Disclosure Options
The CRB acts as a `one-stop-shop' for organisations, checking police records and, in relevant cases, information held by the Department of Health (DH) and the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). There are two levels of CRB check currently available via the U.K. office; called Standard and Enhanced Disclosures.
Although it is worth noting that when the CRB was originally established a third level of check - Basic Disclosure was intended. The Basic Disclosure shows details of convictions held on the Police National Computer which are unspent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 or will state if there are no such convictions. It is issued to individuals only, not employers.
HFRS's criminal disclosure service order did propose that the Basic Disclosure check be applied for all employees. However, this level of check was never introduced as an option via the CRB, although it is available to individuals only, not employers via the Scottish Bureau - called `Disclosure Scotland'.
The Standard and Enhanced Disclosure CRB checks are available in cases where an employer is entitled to ask exempted questions under the Exceptions Order to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (ROA) 1974. This includes any organisation whose staff or volunteers work with children or vulnerable adults, this aspect causes a lot of confusion amongst employees as there are a number of caveats attached to this broad definition associated with whether contact with these groups is supervised and/or regular.
Standard Disclosure
This is primarily available to anyone involved in working with children or vulnerable adults, as well as certain other occupations and entry into professions as specified in the Exceptions Order to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (ROA) 1974. Standard Disclosures show current and spent convictions, cautions, reprimands and warnings held on the Police National Computer. If the post involves working with children or vulnerable adults, the following may also be searched:
o Protection of Children Act (POCA) List
o Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) List
o Information that is held under Section 142 of the Education Act 2002 (formerly known as List 99)
Broadly this category of check should be applied for employees working in the current areas:
o Those whose duties involve regular contact with children and vulnerable adults.
o Certain professions in areas such as health, pharmacy, and law.
o Senior managers in banking and financial services.
The Standard Disclosure is issued to individuals and copied to the registered body.
The Service is not using this disclosure, as it has opted to use the enhanced disclosure.
Enhanced Disclosure
This is the highest level of check available to anyone involved in regularly caring for, training, supervising or being in sole charge of children or vulnerable adults. It is also available in certain licensing purposes and judicial appointments. Enhanced Disclosures contain the same information as the Standard Disclosure, but with the addition of any relevant and proportionate information held by the local police forces.
The CRB recognises that the Standard and Enhanced Disclosure information can be extremely sensitive and personal, therefore it has published a Code of Practice and employers' guidance for recipients of Disclosures to ensure they are handled fairly and used properly.
The Enhanced Disclosure is available for positions involving regular caring for, or training, supervising or being in sole charge of children or vulnerable adults.
The service has opted to undertake enhanced disclosure checks for all employees who fall within the scope of interpretation of those required to have such checks. To undertake CRB checks the employer must either be registered with the CRB or employ an `Umbrella' organisation to undertake these checks on behalf of the employer.
HFRS registered with the CRB from outset and has been submitting the relevant documents for enhanced checks to be completed on certain categories of employees.
However, the Service was advised by the Criminal Records Bureau that our registration to undertake these checks was being removed as we no longer meet their criteria for registered organisations. In particular, there is a requirement to undertake a minimum of 100 enhanced checks per annum. This meant that HFRS had to undertake these checks via an `Umbrella' arrangement. Hampshire County Council (HCC) was able to provide this service. Subsequently, with the change in policy, HFRS has again be able to qualify with the CRB to become a registered body.
Limitations of Disclosures
There is a limit to the usefulness of the information provided by Standard or Enhanced Disclosures. Where information is revealed, the Disclosure will generally only provide the basic facts - the name and date of offences, for instance, and the sentence. It will not put them into context. Nor will it explain what particular offences mean. The Disclosure may also not provide information on people convicted abroad, although the CRB will draw on data on the Police National Computer which contains details of some 70,000 offences committed overseas. In a small number of cases an Enhanced Disclosure check may result in the local police force disclosing non-conviction information to the registered body only and not the applicant, this may include information about a current investigation.
Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974
When reviewing these arrangements there were a number of additional pieces of legislation that were considered, primarily the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.
Under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act a person is effectively given a fresh start after a set period of time, for criminal offences they have committed up to a certain severity/term of imprisonment. Under this law any conviction for a criminal offence can be regarded as spent provided:
o The conviction did not carry a sentence excluded from the Act, such as a custodial sentence of over two and a half years
o No further convictions occurred within the rehabilitation period
Once a conviction is regarded as spent the rehabilitated person does not have to reveal its existence in most circumstances and can answer no to the question "do you have a criminal record?" Certain occupations are exceptions and are listed in ROA (Exceptions) Order 1975.
It is an offence under this law for anyone who has access to criminal records to disclose information about spent convictions unless officially authorised. It is also a serious offence to obtain information about spent convictions by means of fraud, dishonesty or bribery.