Archived decisions
Ref |
Risk Description |
current risk rating - red/amber/ green |
Current score |
Target Score |
Direction of Travel since September 2008 | ||||
Likelihood |
Impact |
Total |
Likelihood |
Impact |
Total | ||||
01 |
Failure to respond effectively following an extensive disruption to normal methods of working |
Amber |
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
_ |
05 |
Failure to identify and react to new risks for/in local communities. |
Amber |
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
ê |
06 |
Failure to recognise and comply with and/or properly manage the Authority's legal and regulatory responsibilities |
Green |
2 |
5 |
10 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
_ |
06e |
Failure to comply with and properly manage the Authority's legal and regulatory responsibilities in respect to the statutory duties imposed by the: - Regulatory Enforcement & Sanctions Bill (2008) - Compliance Code (2008) |
Green |
3 |
3 |
9 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
ê |
06g |
Failure to comply with and/or properly manage the Authority's legal and moral responsibilities for the health, safety and welfare of its employees under all relevant Health and Safety legislation and guidance, including the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 |
Amber |
3 |
5 |
15 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
_ |
(formerly 04) | |||||||||
06h |
Failure to have the appropriate policies and procedures in place to manage driving and vehicle related risks |
Amber |
3 |
5 |
15 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
New entry |
07a |
Failure to ensure that the transition to Firelink will not adversely affect the delivery of service |
Green |
Project now complete and therefore risk is no longer relevant |
ê | |||||
07b |
Failure to ensure that the transition to the Regional Control Centre will not adversely affect the delivery of service |
Amber |
3 |
5 |
15 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
_ |
09 |
Failure to maintain the Retained Duty System (RDS) establishment at an operationally acceptable level |
Red |
4 |
4 |
16 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
_ |
10 |
Failure of the Service to adequately reflect and understand our diverse communities, and as a result fail to deliver our services effectively |
Amber |
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
_ |
11 |
Failure to protect vulnerable members of the community and our staff in the course of our service delivery, where there is contact between them |
Red |
4 |
5 |
20 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
_ |
(formerly 6f) | |||||||||
12 |
Failure to adequately fund and deal with the increasing burden and cost of repairing, maintaining and improving the Authority's properties. |
Amber |
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
New entry |
13 |
Failure to collect, maintain, store and provide relevant, timely and accurate site specific risk information to adequately inform the risk assessment at an incident. |
Red |
4 |
5 |
20 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
New entry |
14 |
Failure to anticipate, plan and react to the implications of changes in the economic environment |
Amber |
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
New entry |
15 |
Failure to develop, implement and maintain information communications technology systems that: · are resilient and support the achievement of the Service objectives · capitalise on the benefits in terms of efficiency, economy and effectiveness of our systems |
Red |
4 |
5 |
20 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
New entry |
5 |
||||||
4 |
1 |
3 | ||||
3 |
1 |
5 |
3 | |||
2 |
1 | |||||
1 |
||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 | ||
Impact | ||||||
Risk Rating Table - illustrates the current distribution of the risk scores. The numbers in the grid denote the number of risks currently on the Strategic Register with the relevant likelihood and impact scores.
Secretarial/WP/W/C/HFRA/2009 2009 09 16 Risk Register Summary Appx 1 NW/JMW/8/9/09