Archived decisions
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
Decision Report
Decision Maker: |
Efficiency Panel | ||||
Date of Decision: |
22 September 2009 | ||||
Decision Title: |
Report of the Efficiency Board | ||||
Decision Reference: |
951 | ||||
Report From: |
Director of Property, Business and Regulatory Services | ||||
Contact name: |
Karen Murray | ||||
Tel: |
01962 847876 |
Email: |
|||
1. |
Executive Summary | |||
1.1 |
The purpose of this report is to confirm the Efficiency Board's current programme of work. | |||
1.2 |
The Board's initial portfolio of projects is estimated to deliver between £10 and £15million of new cashable efficiencies over the course of the next five years; further opportunities for efficiencies and productivity gains will be identified as the joint work of the Panel and Board progresses. | |||
2. |
Context | |||
2.1 |
In October 2008 the Cabinet approved: | |||
· the development of a three-year efficiency programme related to the corporate reviews (now completed and being implemented) and the medium-term financial strategy · the outline efficiency plan and asked the Chief Executive to bring forward in 2009/10 as part of the budget process · the establishment of a corporate efficiency fund. | ||||
2.2 |
Since receiving Cabinet approval the original broad efficiency themes relating to procurement, workforce costs, corporate services and a number of cross-cutting issues have been developed. A programme has also been established by the recently formed Officers' Efficiency Board. Initially the work of the Board is concentrating on "quick win" projects, monitoring the delivery of the procurement corporate service review recommendations and developing a forward programme of projects. | |||
3. |
Portfolio of Efficiency Projects | |||
3.1 |
Procurement The twelve workstreams are expected to deliver around £10m of efficiencies identified in the table below: | |||
Table one: Procurement workstreams Category of Spend Target Savings (£000s pa) Fostering 300 Domiciliary care 2,500 Learning Disability Services 1,200 Children Transition 40 Home to School Taxis 1,100 Home to School Buses 250 Specialist, Technical and Consultancy 2,100 Education, Training, Information and Conferences 400 IT Equipment and Services 320 Other common use goods and services1 660 Purchase to Pay Process Savings 1,000 Construction (Property and Highways) TBC Total Estimated Savings 9,870 |
||||
A Project Initiation Document (PID) has been prepared and challenged with the key outcome from this being the exploration of bringing forward some of the savings. Given the value of procurement at £600m this area has the potential to release further significant efficiencies. The Roots Review, a report reviewing arrangements for efficiencies from smarter procurement in local government, was recently undertaken by Bill Roots and is attached to the report as Appendix 2. | ||||
3.2 |
Reducing Workforce costs | |||
There are ten workstreams under this overall heading covering reduced travel costs and reductions to the pay bill. The PID is going through its challenge stage and the workstreams need to be prioritised. | ||||
Some efficiencies have already been achieved in related areas and these are being quantified (includes recruitment portal, subsidised car-leasing scheme removal). | ||||
1 Includes plant, machinery, office suppliers, furniture, cleaning and janitorial, printed and pre-recorded media | ||||
3.3 |
Good Housekeeping | |||
Five workstreams have been identified to date which will target reduced energy consumption, data-checking and opportunities to reduce the use of IT hardware, eg printers. This area has many links to Hampshire Workstyle which, over time, will enable considerable efficiencies relating to space and storage. | ||||
3.4 |
Review of Income and Charges | |||
Initial ideas have been flagged and need further exploration and discussion. This could be a good theme for a joint member and officer workshop. | ||||
3.5 |
The portfolio of efficiency projects is appended and the Panel will note the inclusion of the Corporate Service Review opportunities which are being overseen by the Change Board. It is expected that these will deliver further savings. For example, the IT implementation will yield at least a further £1m of efficiencies relating to streamlined administrative processes. | |||
4 |
Conclusions | |||
4.1 |
The Board, while only established for a few months, has already identified opportunities for significant new cashable efficiencies and has made good progress putting in place robust plans to achieve these. | |||
4.2 |
Further opportunities exist and some of these may be appropriate to explore through a joint workshop approach. | |||
5 |
Recommendations It is recommended that: | |||
5.1 |
The Panel endorse and comment upon the current portfolio of projects. | |||
5.2 |
Consideration is given to developing joint workshops to explore further opportunities. | |||
CORPORATE OR LEGAL INFORMATION:
Links to the Corporate Strategy
Hampshire safer and more secure for all: |
no |
Corporate Business plan link number (if appropriate): | |
Maximising well-being: |
no |
Corporate Business plan link number (if appropriate): | |
Enhancing our quality of place: |
no |
Corporate Business plan link number (if appropriate): | |
OR | |
This proposal does not link to the Corporate Strategy but, nevertheless, requires a decision. | |
Other Significant Links
Links to previous Member decisions: |
|||
Title |
Reference |
Date | |
Corporate Efficiency |
294 |
27 October 2008 | |
Direct links to specific legislation or Government Directives |
|||
Title |
Date | ||
Section 100 D - Local Government Act 1972 - background documents | |
The following documents discuss facts or matters on which this report, or an important part of it, is based and have been relied upon to a material extent in the preparation of this report. (NB: the list excludes published works and any documents which disclose exempt or confidential information as defined in the Act.) | |
Document |
Location |
IMPACT ASSESSMENTS:
1. Equalities Impact Assessment:
1.1 Race and equality impact assessment has been considered in the development of this report and no adverse impact has been identified.
2. Impact on Crime and Disorder:
2.1 The County Council has a legal obligation under Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 to consider the impact of all the decisions it makes on the prevention of crime. The proposals in this report have no impact on the prevention of crime.
3. Climate Change:
a) How does what is being proposed impact on our carbon footprint / energy consumption?
No impact identified
b) How does what is being proposed consider the need to adapt to climate change, and be resilient to its longer term impacts?
No impact identified
Hampshire County Council
Efficiency Panel & Efficiency Board
Work on Cashable and Productivity Efficiency Gains at September 2009 (both within departments and across HCC)
Working draft (note: numbers within categories are for ease of reference, they do not indicate priority)
1. Short term efficiency gains (also longer term) |
1.1 Reduce workforce costs & improving productivity 1.2 Procurement CSR implementation - accelerated savings 1.3 Facilities management / good housekeeping 1.4 CSRs implementation |
2. Longer term efficiency gains |
2.1 Reduce workforce costs & improving productivity (also short term) 2.2 Procurement CSR implementation (also short term) 2.3 Facilities management / good housekeeping (also short term) 2.4 Hampshire Workstyle 2.5 Rationalise accommodation, assets and property 2.6 Transformation through technology / IT Services CSR implementation / greater standardisation / mandating of office systems 2.7 Improved approaches to charging and income generation including external grants and contributions 2.8 South East Improvement Partnership (SEIP) projects e.g. construction 2.9 Manage expectations / set and communicate service standards |
3. Efficiency gains beyond HCC |
3.1 Leverage more benefit from partnerships 3.2 Negotiate more value from contracts / getting better deals from contracted services 3.3 Get more value from / rationalise accommodation, assets and property 3.4 Shared services within HCC, County-wide, and regional |